HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

    Loads video thumbnails from YouTube, which lets it see your IP address. Off until you turn it on, and remembered in this browser only.

Posts from Removal of moderation privileges from inactive moderators.

Suggestions and improvements.
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
Offline Ment
Registered:
Posts: 41,374
#16
Auto-translated
Besides him, no one else will definitely do it.
He doesn't even do it himself ;)
I've already given a report on the fifth one. Once again:
SteN -- last appeared in April.
LotR -- July
_Prizrak_ -- September, which isn't critical, but still September
Mish-gan -- relatively recently, but he has a section like that, there's nothing to moderate there, and he got the rights for his mapmaking contest, which ended ages ago.
Primus -- вообще April 2011
Well, Leopolus appeared recently, so that's fine.
WisTrit -- doesn't really moderate, but he has an undeniable plus: he visits the forum and can be contacted if necessary.
That's the situation in general. I said about Lux, the rest are relatively active.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Imaris
Registered:
Posts: 16,156
#17
Auto-translated
Or maybe not even mention it. Zero moderation activity doesn't necessarily mean that the moderator doesn't visit the portal and isn't needed at all.
But it should be considered as a factor.
Here, a more selective approach is needed. IMHO. For example, WOG moderates LotR. Besides him, no one will definitely do it. What's the point in removing his moderator rights?
Lux moderates mapmaking. Does anyone want to replace him?
If there's no point in having a moderator anyway, you can remove them from the section, as nothing will change. The positive aspect I see is that it will be easier to identify which sections are not being moderated after they are formally left without moderators.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Dirty_Player
Registered:
Posts: 11,030
#18
Auto-translated
Okay. For convenience, I will add information about each part of the Heroes series to the first post. So that it can be directed to the Creator.

Added 4 minutes later
I would also suggest considering the following:
Kamikaze
XEL
Machete
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Zybr
Registered:
Posts: 7,032
#19
Auto-translated
Who moderates Heroes 4, 5, and 6? Who is an unnecessary moderator among them? Let's figure it out specifically. We remove the unnecessary ones, find replacements, and everything will be fine.
In game 4, there is no need to remove or add anyone.

Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message

WisTrit doesn't really moderate much, but he has a definite plus: he visits the forum, and if something happens, you can contact him.
Since he was mentioned, I want to raise another question about him: whether he meets the requirements for his position.
/post/626075/
This is the most recent example of his behavior. Previously, he often made similar statements; now, he rarely writes anything at all. It seems to me that a moderator should set an example of behavior and culture, not imitate those who violate the rules.


Барон "Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!


1
⚖️
1
User Avatar
Offline ToX
Registered:
Posts: 6,426
#74
Auto-translated
Thanks, Amko. Getting back to the topic. I haven't even seen many of the moderators in person. They don't communicate with the community, and they don't engage in moderation activities. Yes, I only participate in two sections, but I would still be happy if only the moderators I know and whose work I see remain. Slonysh, Zubr, Kosha, Ment, Arandor. An interesting question is how well they work, but that's a sensitive topic, and you could get penalized for it.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Imaris
Registered:
Posts: 16,156
#75
Auto-translated
Perhaps some benefits should be introduced for moderators in recognition of their good work?
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Arandor
Registered:
Posts: 60,132
#76
Auto-translated
Yes, I'm active in two sections only, but personally, I would be happy if only moderators I know and whose work I can see remained.
Slonysh, Zubr, Kosha, Ment, Arandor.
Two sections and five moderators, three of whom have nothing to do with the sections you are active in, but their work is visible. Tsk, tsk, they're interfering in sections that aren't theirs. Perhaps this is the root of most conflicts? Let everyone fulfill their duties where they should.

Be strong. Believe
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline ToX
Registered:
Posts: 6,426
#78
Auto-translated
I meant that they engage in conversations with people and participate in the social life of the forum, and that you can always turn to them if you have any questions, I emphasize, not so much as a moderator, but as a person!
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Leolopus
Registered:
Posts: 523
#79
Auto-translated
In the HMM3 online sub-section, there are a total of four moderators (I didn't check who moderates the entire section and who moderates just the sub-section), but there are only four of them. In the HMM5 online sub-section, there are nine moderators, four of whom haven't been active on the forum for two months or more, and two of whom no longer have any direct connection to the sub-section. That's six out of nine. The remaining three are Killa and I, who moderate the specified sub-section, and Ment, who moderates the HMM5 section. I don't want to offend anyone, but I think three moderators would be more than enough for this sub-section.
"Шанс есть всегда, но не везде." ;)
0
⚖️
0
In reply to ToX
User Avatar
Offline Слоныш
Registered:
Posts: 2,033
#80
Auto-translated
It's one thing to remove moderators who are goofing off and not moderating their section properly. Or those who applied, became moderators, and then disappeared. But there are people who have genuinely done a lot for the forum in their time. Some of them haven't visited the forum for six months because their sections have become quiet. But let's kick them in the back by removing their moderator privileges? No one is rushing to replace them, but let's remove these ones. Instead of saying "thank you." :) And by the way, if anyone is so concerned about the discrepancy between the appearance of moderators and what is prescribed in the Rules, let's turn our inquisitive gaze to the "Coordinator Rules" section, point 10. Does anyone among the green-clad want to raise the issue of removing moderators based on this criterion? Otherwise, these living ones are causing more trouble than the dead ones.
ToX
I haven't even seen many of the moderators in person. They don't communicate with the people, they don't engage in moderator activities.
Are you an active user of the "Heroes" sections? That is, do you immediately notice if off-topic posts are removed from a thread about, say, HoMM III Offline, or if unnecessary topics are moved to the trash? If anything, this was a rhetorical question, no need to answer.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Imaris
Registered:
Posts: 16,156
#81
Auto-translated
But there are people who have truly done a lot for the forum in their time. Some of them haven't visited the forum for six months because their sections have become quiet. And let's just stab them in the back by removing their moderator privileges? No one is rushing to replace them, but let's remove these people. Instead of saying "thank you." :)
We are grateful to these people, but what is the connection between gratitude and removing them from their positions? If they return to the forum and ask to have their privileges restored, please, take them back, but only if they moderate. And if they don't moderate, then give back the green nickname. It doesn't matter what happened in the past; what matters is what's happening now.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Слоныш
User Avatar
Offline Leolopus
Registered:
Posts: 523
#82
Auto-translated
Slonysh

But there are people who have really done a lot for the forum in their time. Some of them haven't visited the forum for six months because their sections have become quiet. And let's kick them in the back by removing their moderator powers? No, no one is rushing to replace them, but let's remove these ones. Instead of saying "thank you." :)
I didn't quite understand the meaning of the quoted paragraph; my first impression from reading it is that it suggests introducing a status of "lifetime moderators for past merits":) I'm not diminishing the role and contribution of the moderators HoM{M}ie, Primus, SteN, WisTrit, LotR, Prizrak (all of whom, in a way, moderate the HMM5 on-line subforum), but some of them haven't appeared on the forum at all for quite some time, Primus hasn't been here since 2009, some appear occasionally, but have nothing to do with the subforum, i.e., they don't participate in the life of the subforum in any way, they don't play on-line, they don't participate in discussions, i.e., they are not observed in the subforum either directly or indirectly. Perhaps they "live" and moderate in other sections (subforums). In any case, I can't understand why there are 9 moderators in the HMM5 on-line subforum when the much more active 3 on-line has only 4 moderators, and all four are active participants in the life of the subforum in every sense of the word.
"Шанс есть всегда, но не везде." ;)
1
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Imaris
Registered:
Posts: 16,156
#83
Auto-translated
HoM[M]ie, as far as I know, is in charge of some kind of online ranking system there. And he took over this responsibility from VisTrit some time ago.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
Offline Leolopus
Registered:
Posts: 523
#84
Auto-translated
Imaris
HoM[M]ie, as far as I know, manages some kind of online ranking system there. And he took over this responsibility from VisTrit some time ago.
I agree, there is such a topic, it is important and necessary, HoM[M]ie's role in the sub-section is clear and relevant, now we just need to figure out the roles of the others.
"Шанс есть всегда, но не везде." ;)
0
⚖️
0