Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
As for the chat and ranks, those are more like my personal wishes than serious requests. But adding a couple of codes, I think, wouldn't be too difficult, especially since I've seen this feature on other forums with similar engines.
As for iframe, I asked the Creator to do something about it after one overly clever user loaded all sorts of nonsense through them. The Creator simply decided to remove them.
Regarding the Spoiler, I also asked to add it a long time ago, but it never got around to it.
Otherwise, I'd like to bring back ranks and the old-school reputation system, where you could put +/- under a post.
And in generalYuuhei
From a technical standpoint, the forum is extremely outdated, not to mention that its functionality has only decreased over time (first it was ranks, then they introduced limited search, inability to upload files for unregistered users, etc.). If HeroesWorld needs anything, it's a full-scale modernization and a more powerful server, but that requires funding and an active administration.
The forum requires a global modernization... but who would take it on...
P.S. Personally, I am against huge signatures; many people simply abuse this. It's too annoying to scroll past them...
Regarding iframes, I asked the Creator to do something about them after one particularly clever user started loading all sorts of junk through them. The Creator decided to simply remove them.
As practice has shown, you can load the same junk through Object. Here, as Ment wrote above, posts should be filtered using regular expressions to prevent anything from being loaded.
the old-school reputation system, where you could give +/– ratings to posts
I don't quite understand this point. What's the difference from the current reputation system? Or are we talking about displaying information about the number of upvotes and downvotes for each post?
I've been asking for a spoiler feature for a long time, but it never happened.
Well, now, thanks to Shaman, the code is already available.
Well, now thanks to Shaman, the code is finally here.
This is just a little trick, not real code. To do it properly, you need to expand the number of BB codes with the code `` so that instead of the tag, a nicely formatted spoiler with the content inside the tag is displayed.
The old system was good because it didn't have a limit, and its pros and cons were more readily apparent. Plus, you could cancel or change a rating. On the other hand, I like the ability to comment in the current system, which allows for a chat-like experience in the database (until the limit is reached). The public display of reputation, I'm not sure if it's a plus or a minus. So, I don't know if it's worth changing the reputation system; I've already gotten used to the new one, and I like it.
Ah, now I understand. Well, then, perhaps it would make sense to somehow combine these two systems (for example, publicly displaying the morale bonuses and the ability to cancel them if necessary, but at the same time, morale still changes through the message interface, which allows not only for casual chatting but, more importantly, for a detailed explanation of the reason for the morale change).
The old system was good because it had no limit, and pros and cons were distributed more readily, plus you could cancel or change the rating. On the other hand, I like the ability to comment in the current system, which allows you to have a chat in the database (until the limit runs out). Public display of reputation, I don't know, it's a plus or a minus. So, I don't know if it's worth changing the reputation system; I've already gotten used to the new one, and I like it.
As practice shows, the majority simply ignore the new system. The old one was good because it was used much more actively. Ment
Ah, now I understand you. Well, then, perhaps it would make sense to somehow combine these two systems (for example, public display of pros and their cancellation if necessary, but at the same time, morale still changes through the message interface, which allows not only to chat but also, which I think is more important, to explain in detail the reason for the change in morale).
There was an intermediate system, but it didn't last long. Each message had its own history, and you could read the comments.
The downside of this activity is the karma system and the amusing flame wars that erupt across half the forum because of all the smart alecks who are mass-editing the database for everyone.
As far as I remember, the intermediate system was too convoluted. And you can still read comments on your own posts. Here's what I think should be added to the current system:
1. The ability to view and undo your influence on the database (with comments). Perhaps this should be done in a similar way to viewing comments on your post – instead of "You cannot influence the database twice in one post," display a comment, a bird icon, and an "undo influence" button.
2. Fix the ability to see the author of a comment – as far as I know, some user groups currently don't display the nickname of the person who wrote in the database. This happened to me when I left a clan; I had to go back because I didn't want to guess who was messing things up.
3. Optionally add an icon to each post showing its "goodness/badness" and the total change to the database for that post. But not a stupid star icon like before; instead, a small bird icon next to the influence button, sized to match the bird icons on the button.
The database isn't a sparrow; once you change it, you can't catch it again; I'm against that. As for everything else, the current and old systems can be combined, and no one will lose out as a result.
But there is already a tag for strikethrough. As for all sorts of "I don't like long signatures(((" - you can always inform the user about this, and if he doesn't want to change anything, you can add him to the ignore list.
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?
tags and . The first one works somewhat, but the "ashtemelka" feature has been disabled in some forum sections, and it's also easier to click a button than to constantly switch keyboard layouts
I would like it to be possible to upload not only zip archives to the forum, but also, for example, 7z and maybe even rar. The problem is that zip doesn't always compress files to the required maximum size of 5 million bytes. Therefore, I have to archive the same data twice, change the extension, or, even worse, upload it to third-party sites, where, after catching all sorts of viruses, the user will receive a message "storage period expired" instead of the desired map, for example. Allowing the upload of the aforementioned archive formats would not only solve this problem but also reduce overall memory usage.
I don't understand the sacred meaning behind the different size limits for one type of file with different extensions:
Heroist
