Skip to content

Posts from Percentages Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Open
Do you need them?
18 voters
Single choice Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#91
Auto-translated
Everything is clear, as long as your team does well.
PS, I forgot to mention the failed execution.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#92
Auto-translated
Well, that Necropolis mafia was truly a unique case. Of course, you can overdo anything. Although, I was less concerned about the number of defenses there; there were other things, more related to randomness. Like, you absolutely have to kill the Sorceress to win, but you need to get incredibly lucky to actually accomplish that.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
In reply to Ment
User Avatar
#93
Auto-translated
Ment
Well, that Necropolis mafia was truly a unique case. Of course, you can overdo anything. Although, I was less concerned about the number of defenses; there were other issues, more related to randomness. Like, you absolutely have to kill the Healer to win, but you need to get incredibly lucky to actually achieve that.
Okay, about the randomness... Who stopped you from killing Heroist, especially since we had removed his protection? Oh, right, you couldn't shoot without the right material. :D So, it's not randomness, but the rules that are to blame. :) And you lost when they labeled you as a "Ryaschur." You could have at least guessed that his turn was over because the mafia bit him yesterday. :smile04:
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).
User Avatar
#94
Auto-translated
And you yourself got eliminated when you were registered as a "Ryaschur." You could have at least guessed that he had no moves left because he was bitten by the Mafia yesterday.
Oh, we've already discussed this; it was foolish to try to convince the Mafia of such a thing. You wouldn't have believed me regardless of my arguments. I perfectly understand how discussions work in a Mafia chat; it's simply impossible to confuse the Mafia in such a situation. And there was no need to convince the town; the townspeople weren't bothering me. Otherwise, I agree.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#95
Auto-translated
What interesting discussions you have here. Just ask Nebka if he would remove half of Oben's abilities and reduce the execution protection of Mafotima based on player advice, and if he answers negatively, your attacks on Artsa regarding the We-He mafia will look like a funny attempt to elevate yourself, when in reality you are simply using a team that is obviously overpowered. And I would strongly advise Yashchura to curb his own wild egoism and reduce his self-importance, which, combined with his irritatingly inadequate style of forum communication, creates a very negative impression of him during various discussions and hinders constructive and adequate dialogue.

Whatever
User Avatar
#96
Auto-translated
:D
No, actually, it was fine. I'm not complaining because it was an interesting experimental role for me. It was difficult to predict in advance.
-----------
And in general, Heroist, you're a great guy. It's a pity that you fell under the bad influence of Arandor ;)
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#97
Auto-translated
Total: 6 out of 11.
I don't know about the others, but I personally drew certain conclusions thanks to the discussions in this thread. If it's no longer needed by anyone, the posts can be moved to the general topic.
User Avatar
#98
Auto-translated
If only all 11 people were playing, including you.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#99
Auto-translated
I don't understand what your problem is. Interested parties could have come to certain conclusions by observing the issues raised in this topic, taking into account the arguments provided, etc. This primarily applies to those who will continue to organize games. Conducting this poll does not force anyone to do anything and does not have any "legislative" power. Some people have drawn something from its results and, in particular, from the discussions, some have not, and some are simply being stubborn and arguing without any apparent reason.
User Avatar
#100
Auto-translated
I would vote for both options.
Кампании для Heroes V 3.1 (Трилогия):

Пробуждение зла
Нашествие из Преисподней
Смена эпох

Скачать все кампании одним архивом: Яндекс.Диск Google.Диск

You can download the set of 3 Campaigns (English version) here


Одиночные сценарии Heroes V 3.1:


Незваные гости
Красный кристалл
Синий кристалл
Закат тьмы

Мультиплеерные карты для Heroes V 3.1:

Легендарная война
Сердце вулкана
Передел мира
In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl
User Avatar
#101
Auto-translated
Daoshi
I don't understand what your problem is.
The problem is that he is Arandor.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: nebov24@gmail.com
User Avatar
#102
Auto-translated
What conclusions are we drawing? Whoever was comfortable with a particular set, or liked it, or found it suitable for a specific build, will continue to use it. This was clear from the beginning.

Be strong. Believe
In reply to MasteR
User Avatar
#103
Auto-translated
MasteR
I would vote for both options.
Either percentages are needed, or they aren't. You can't be in favor of 2 mutually exclusive paragraphs. ;)

Added 4 minutes later
Arandor
Whoever created sets in the way that was convenient/pleasing/suited a specific set, will continue to do so. This was clear from the beginning.
In the "old days," all sets had percentages. But evolution doesn't stand still, and gradually people began to move from percentages to more advanced technologies. ;) Except for stubborn "conservatives," of course...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).
User Avatar
#104
Auto-translated
Daoshi
I drew certain conclusions based on the discussions in this thread.
At the very least, this post makes your statement incorrect, not to mention that no one can know the viewpoints of the other participants in the discussion until they express themselves.
But we can ask a different question. If you think in this way, then what was the point of arguing in the first place?

Oh, never mind. You don't have to answer. Regardless of your answer, I won't continue this circus.
User Avatar
#105
Auto-translated
Different conclusions can be drawn, even those unrelated to the question itself. I doubt your conclusions will drastically affect how you create sets. And players have expressed their opinions many times, so there was little point in the poll.
It depends on the question itself. It's one thing to discuss the emergence of a psychological "mafia," open roles, and other large-scale details of the game, and another to conduct polls where the results are already known and will not change anything. Some will continue to play passively, signing up for almost every game. Some will continue to make mistakes in every game, and even one-time protections won't help them play better. Some people simply don't care what game it is; they will sign up anyway.

Be strong. Believe