Skip to content

Posts from Mafia 90. The Tale of Oldforest. Auto-translated

Mafia Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to G.K.
User Avatar
#1530
Auto-translated
G.K.


The setting is very interesting. IMHO, the newspapers are too obvious; they shouldn't display so much information. Or at least, it should be encrypted somehow.
I agree.
User Avatar
#1531
Auto-translated
I'll guess right away that forcing oneself to execute a non-essential unit, and introducing random death for those who voted against it, could severely disrupt the balance.
In reply to Драккошка
User Avatar
#1532
Auto-translated
Drakkoska
My mafia role
By the way, I didn't get the XX kills because, besides you, I only infected one other peaceful player, and I absolutely didn't want to kill the last mafia member.))

Added 1 minute ago
Ment
Mika is great. Even in the final, I still didn't realize that he was the killer.
But such an inconspicuous game also had a downside. The execution of Heroist, for example.
No, I had to cosplay as a town member anyway.
User Avatar
#1533
Auto-translated
Interesting idea. However, I have two immediate concerns. Let's see, who can guess what they are? )
1. It's overpowered!!!
2. What's the point of the executioner's death if the jester has already won?
Did I guess correctly?
E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza,
e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
In reply to KindShaman
User Avatar
#1534
Auto-translated
KindShaman
Unfortunately, I ran out of energy, patience, and inspiration to write articles, and seeing that the maniac was completely cornered, I announced the final round...
Well, basically, there was no point in fighting anymore, maybe just kill a couple of people, but there was no way to win anyway. So, the final round was, unfortunately, accurate.
User Avatar
#1535
Auto-translated
Jester won, but that doesn't mean the others lost – that's the whole point!
User Avatar
#1536
Auto-translated
In the Mafia game mode, there were neutral players who could choose to win alongside one of the sides, as far as I remember.
In reply to KindShaman
User Avatar
#1537
Auto-translated
KindShaman
Jester won, but that doesn't mean everyone else lost – that's the point!
That's just nonsense. If one troll
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).
User Avatar
#1538
Auto-translated
The Jester isn't a maniac; he's neutral, and neutrals have the freedom to choose who to defeat.

Added 1 minute ago
I liked the idea of personal victories, although it's not easy to implement without disrupting the balance.
User Avatar
#1539
Auto-translated
I'll guess right away that forcing oneself to execute a non-influential role, and the random chance of the person who voted against them dying, can severely disrupt the balance.
Oh, that's another issue.
I see the following problems:
1) It unpleasantly shortens the game. Because if a role wins (meaning it wins completely) – the game ends. And that's it... And you can achieve such a victory even when there are still a lot of players in the game.
2) If the game continues, the problem of ambiguity arises. Owen said something about personal victories in his network... But in my opinion, this is not very cool. The victory should be unambiguous and not shared with anyone except the members of your team. Otherwise, it's not a victory, but a draw. A compromise option where no one can wear a laurel wreath...
1. OP!!!
2. What's the point of the executioner dying if the jester has already won?
Did I guess right?
Nice try!
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#1540
Auto-translated
In any case, this role would add some spice to the daytime discussions. The player is acting aggressively and is looking for a way to get executed. Most likely, he is a Mafia member. Most likely, he will eventually be hanged. But here, it's not certain that he is a Mafia member; he could be that very neutral player who is provoking others into executing him.
User Avatar
#1541
Auto-translated
For some reason, my personal victories are associated with getting rewards and a SUDDEN, massive boost to a role that still exists in the game and carries its team.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#1542
Auto-translated
Whether to buff or not to buff will be decided by those who try this feature in their multiplayer games. The idea isn't bad, but only if it's applied to neutral, solitary creatures, and not to a specific faction like city-mafia-maniac.
In reply to mika
User Avatar
#1543
Auto-translated
mika
What's the reason for that, by the way? (again))

Added 1 minute ago
Thank you.

Well, let's just say, reread your posts. You were so confused about deciphering the newspaper and the specifics of certain roles that either you were playing well (which I doubt), or you couldn't be those roles.
Кампании для Heroes V 3.1 (Трилогия):

Пробуждение зла
Нашествие из Преисподней
Смена эпох

Скачать все кампании одним архивом: Яндекс.Диск Google.Диск

You can download the set of 3 Campaigns (English version) here


Одиночные сценарии Heroes V 3.1:


Незваные гости
Красный кристалл
Синий кристалл
Закат тьмы

Мультиплеерные карты для Heroes V 3.1:

Легендарная война
Сердце вулкана
Передел мира
User Avatar
#1544
Auto-translated
In any case, this role would add some spice to the daytime discussions. The player is behaving aggressively and is looking for a way to get executed. Most likely, he is a Mafia member. Most likely, he will eventually be hanged. But here, it's not certain that he is a Mafia member; he could be that very neutral role that provokes people into executing him.
Yeah, with some refinement, this could be very interesting. The question is, how exactly to refine it.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram