As a conclusion, from observing the game against Laszlo, playing as Axel, the most effective strategy would probably be to initially attack his zealots with the knights, and not his other units, so that the zealots cannot gain wrath from the dying units of their comrades. Because if you don't attack them first, the subsequent battle will most likely be lost. I won one of the battles simply by luck, attacking him first. Luck kicked in, and I was able to wipe out 500 zealots and a stack of crossbowmen behind them. In the second battle, luck didn't work, the arrangement was different, and the zealots, which I couldn't attack on the first turn, halved my surrounded knights. It is noteworthy that the rest of my and his army was simply for show. They triggered morale and accelerated the turn of my hero, who in turn inspired, in my case, the knights, and in his, the zealots. And they were also needed to be used as bait for the zealots and knights so that they could not counterattack the desired units.
As a conclusion, from observing the game against Laszlo, playing as Axel, the most effective strategy would probably be to initially attack his zealots with the knights, and not his other units, so that the zealots cannot gain wrath from the dying units of their comrades. Because if you don't attack them first, the subsequent battle will most likely be lost. I won one of the battles simply by luck, attacking him first. Luck kicked in, and I was able to wipe out 500 zealots and a stack of crossbowmen behind them. In the second battle, luck didn't work, the arrangement was different, and the zealots, which I couldn't attack on the first turn, halved my surrounded knights. It is noteworthy that the rest of my and his army was simply for show. They triggered morale and accelerated the turn of my hero, who in turn inspired, in my case, the knights, and in his, the zealots. And they were also needed to be used as bait for the zealots and knights so that they could not counterattack the desired units.