Posts from Percentages

That's true, but... There are pictures and descriptions of the roles, and newspapers should be based on them (and only on them). I still haven't forgotten my healing in the phone booth... How can someone who hasn't watched your Doctor (and I'm one of those people) understand what this healing is? And the role of the killed person should be clearly defined, as well as the role of the killer, and not as it was in '81...

So, is it normal when a town can't execute anyone from the Mafia for three days because they have immunities? And this definitely didn't upset or annoy the townspeople, unlike those same percentages, who rarely play a role.

It's just that someone clearly isn't taking into account the players, most of whom clearly don't have good gameplay skills. In these games, it's generally difficult to defeat anyone, as they constantly retreat, and when they are also immune to defeat, the point is lost.

I believe that we should take percentages less seriously, respect the GM's work, and be able to adapt to any situation. If a GM creates a game with percentages, that's fine, we'll play with percentages. If you lose because of the percentages, it's unfortunate, but it happens; there's nothing you can do about it. After all, we're not playing a game about cows.

Someone clearly isn't taking players into account, most of whom clearly aren't very good at the game.

I think we should take percentages less seriously.

Losing because of percentages is annoying, but sometimes it happens, what can you do.

Don't touch it, booth, Yashur)
First, the reference in the setting is obvious. You could have at least seen it before the game (even if you didn't immediately understand what it was) and just googled it. Second, it didn't matter – after your surprise, a bunch of people who knew the reference piled into the thread and explained everything in five minutes.

Perhaps it would be more accurate to say not "lost," but "was killed."

That is, if a player makes mistakes, executes villagers, kills villagers, guesses roles incorrectly, uses clues poorly, abuses drugs throughout the game, and then loses due to percentages.

We're talking about immunity to execution, if that's what you mean.

Yes, if we take Ve-He as an example, then, well, only the mafia could like the set with a million protections against executions and Oban, who eats without clues.

What I mean is, you write as if you play the game perfectly, without making any mistakes, and then suddenly you lose because of percentages.