Геройский Интернационал
Клан Homo homini - основатель клана
Член РКСМ с 07.07.07.
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
I think that the Game Instructor (GI) should simply make comments to the participant, and a comment made by the GI should carry more weight than a comment from an individual forum user. With this comment, the GI would point out to the forum administration a user who has violated the portal's rules or simply moral and ethical norms, and whether to ban the person or not is up to the authorized individuals to decide... although I wouldn't mind if the GI were given the right to ban a user for a certain period of time (but not permanently); I think such a method of dealing with violators would be very effective.
But for this, it is necessary to coordinate the actions of the GMs. All members of the GM team should point out inappropriate behavior in this or some special topic. And then, only then, give comments and a request for a ban. Everything should be open and clear.
for example, introduce some limitations... like no more than two 2-hour bans per day, with an interval of 1-3 hours between them.
I am not calling for bans for the slightest violation. But if it comes down to insults, then punishment is necessary. We could start with a Wall of Shame. And let everyone see who ended up there and why. A ban should be for the absolute last resort.
P.S. I have always been against the permanent ban of TIGRENOK.
I made changes to the Guild Initiative manifesto. I'm waiting for suggestions on how to organize the "Wall of Shame."
I had the following idea: to hold a tournament for the Guild Cup. The essence of the tournament:
1) Only Guild members can participate.
.....
Share your thoughts.