Posts from Discussion of the Necropolis faction.

It would be more appropriate to have liches as future vampires. And why shouldn't they retain their minds? They are alive (judging by Heroes 6). The only difference between vampires and humans is that they are already dead, and also, to sustain their lives, they need blood, apparently any kind:D

Vampires and liches are different concepts, although I don't see a clear parallel myself. Liches are mages who don't care about their appearance, i.e., souls bound to decaying bodies (while somehow retaining their minds). Vampires, on the other hand, are humanoid creatures without strong magical abilities (although Nicholas is an exception).

Necropolis is a race of undead.

Firstly, everything is different in Ashan.
Secondly, if we're talking about the classics, the souls of liches are never bound to their bodies; they are stored in a phylactery, which ensures the lich's immortality (and the ability to restore its body if it is destroyed).

Added 2 minutes later

Undead is not a race, but a state.

Based on my experience with "Heroes 5," I would say that a lich is a dead mage who "hates all living things," striving to harm the living and bring about death.

Undead are non-living beings, therefore the undead race is a race of the dead. Necropolis is such a race, which is clear and requires no proof.

For these reasons, liches must be dead!

Let's talk about the Ashan liches. Based on my impressions from "Heroes 5," I'd say that a lich is a dead mage who "hates all living things," striving to harm the living and bring about death. Undead are non-living beings, so the undead race is a race of the dead. Necropolis is such a race, which is quite understandable and requires no proof. For these reasons, liches should be dead!!

I base my impressions on the art and information about Heroes 6, and the information, as well as the game producer, confirms that the liches in Heroes 6 are ALIVE. But I'm not denying that normal liches should be dead.

You could also say that Necropolis is not a race in the game "Heroes 6" (of course, not only here).

Sorry, are you experiencing schizophasia? What do appetite, veganism, and being alive have to do with anything? What are you even talking about? And who are you talking to? Clearly not us. Which question are you answering?

And in the second paragraph, you are absolutely wrong in all your statements.

gravel must be dead!!

Did you mean schizophrenia? It's also shameful not to know what "vegetarianism" is.

The point is that a zombie fits the definition of "undead" because it was once a living being, while gravel was not.

And what exactly am I so wrong about? There's a Necropolis castle, a Necropolis army, but not the other way around. Then it sounds just as silly as "Necropolis race." Of your options, only "side" works. But why, if everyone is used to calling all sides in the game "races"? Why nitpick words?

Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in message

A zombie is an undead creature. It was a living, animate being. Therefore, it fits the definition of undead. The meat on the plate was also alive, so it's the meat of a dead person, a corpse. But that doesn't make it any less appetizing :).

Well, "zombie" doesn't always imply a dead person; a zombie is a person who has lost control of their mind and obeys someone else's orders. And "undead" doesn't necessarily mean dead; for example, you definitely know that the word "undead" in Ukrainian means a runny nose. And you're exaggerating about the meat; the meat wasn't alive. The owner of this meat was alive.

Fans of RACES:

That's why I think that all units (but not heroes) should be undead.

And also: let's say that the word "schizophasia" exists. But in my post, I was talking about "vegetarianism." What does "veganism" have to do with it?

Broaden your horizons.