Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Why are you so insistent on pointing out the incorrect spelling of these phrases in the generator? The profile clearly states the location: "Ukraine." I don't think it's necessary to know Russian just because you live there. Although...
I wrote it in Russian.
It could have been done without that phrase:D
And in general... why are you complaining so much? Everyone has equal opportunities; it's not just you who has luck and a better database than before (in Heroes of Might and Magic III, that is). And indeed, what's so absurd about the ability to gather a group of heroes in one place? Here, it's simply a choice: either you take Black Dragons, or you take a gluttonous hero. What will be more useful at the moment depends on the situation. :)
P.S. The reason for the moderation is stated conceptually:
Last edited by ZYbr, Today at 15:50. Reason: provocation.
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made
Agreed. Say hello to your Russian language teacher. Tell her tomorrow, in Russian. :D
I finished school 2 years ago. Now I'm studying at the academy. And, unlike some, when I type quickly, I can make mistakes and often skip commas.
I already said. Angels have it. It exists as a hero skill (resurrection after battle). Although I understand - it's not much. The absence of the spell you need in the form you need is, of course, a separate reason to express dissatisfaction with the game.
And I'm not saying anything bad about angels, they have resurrection. I mean in its pure form: restoring the living and restoring the undead - 2 spells.
Well, yes. So what? Several heroes. One can do one thing, the other can do another. What's so bad about that?
I'm just saying that I have nothing against 2 heroes in a squad, on the contrary, I'm for it (referring to the + mentioned above), but when there are 4 of them for one player and 4 for another player, it's STUPID...
In reality - it's for those who know how to play.
Okay, for example: Vampire's Death or Poison Cloud. On the one hand, vampires regenerate, they fly, on the other hand, Poison Cloud is the only unit in the Castle that shoots. Why not make it like in Heroes 3 or V, as usual?
Argumentatively.
Well, people grow every day, not just on the first day of the week. It's inconvenient to collect resources.
Will you play with me on Battle Underground? I'll be Barbarians. You can be whoever you want. By the way, "barby" is a typo. And you missed a lot of commas, losing two points.
I'd be happy to play, just tell me where and when.:rolleyes:
They have an additional troop increase. They have other bonuses. In the fifth game, they also added magic. Maybe it's a little better. But to criticize the game for not having something that was invented much later is funny.
The Barbarians have a cool Castle (especially the outpost), but it's monotonous. It's not fun without magic. I'm not criticizing, I'm just saying what's wrong so that it can be fixed. I don't want a comparison with the 5th game, please, in the 3rd game, they have a guild of mages up to level 3. And not 5, but not 1 either, so at least there's something.
...because that's how it was in other series of Heroes? In the fourth game, they did it differently. Narrow-mindedness is a big problem in life.
Not because it was in other versions (and still is), but because it's stupid in itself: luck reduces damage or increases damage when a character is attacked. Why not do the opposite? If there is no morale, the character doesn't move - that's understandable, but here only the last one (if any) moves or the first one (+) moves, and otherwise, just add skeletons, elves, angels, etc. to the squad - it's very inconvenient. And also, if luck = 10 or morale = 10, it should not always be the case, but rather randomly, but the more there is, the higher the probability that it will happen.
You're saying. Almost all of your drawbacks are comparisons with the fifth game. )))
1. Not all - 2. The comparison is not only with V, but also with the other parts (2, 3). And finally, I don't think Heroes V is better than 4, I already said that in V, too, not everything (far from everything) is ideal. I think that only Heroes 3 is the best part of all the others (but in them, too, not everything is smooth, but at least the situation is better than in the others).
What to do??? :eek:
Well, you're blind (no offense). I'm saying, write down your pros and cons about 4.
I finished school two years ago. Now I'm studying at the academy. And, unlike some, I can type quickly, but I might make a mistake, and I often skip commas.
Two years already???!!! That's crazy... I understand about the mistake. But in almost every other word - that's a bit much. "Unlike some" - who are you referring to? Do you know how fast someone types? Are you peeking?
And I'm not saying anything bad about the Angels, they have resurrection. I mean in its pure form: restoring the living and restoring the undead - two spells.
Yeah. Nope. If it's "in its pure form." Is that a negative for the game? It's a big plus. I still remember hoarding mana in the third game and fighting battles of almost any difficulty without losses. Blind the last stack of enemies and fully restore your troops. It's sad.
Yes, I wrote that I have nothing against 2 heroes in a squad, on the contrary, I'm for it (referring to the + above), but when there are 4 of them for one player and for another player, it's STUPID.
So, two is good, three is so-so, and four is stupid? :D Good job. You've drawn a clear line. :D
Okay, for example: vampire or spitters. On the one hand, vampires because they self-heal, they fly, on the other hand, spitters because they are the only shooting unit in the castle. Why not make it like in Heroes 3 or 5, as usual?
You don't want an interesting game - you just want it "as usual"? On one map, I'll put vampires, on another, venomous. With some neutrals, griffins, with others, unicorns. This is invariance. Choice. You don't like to choose? Do you only like to do what you're told? Then choose one monster for each castle and don't worry. Build only them. Those who know how to play will be more mobile. That's all.
No, but why do units grow every day and not on the first day of the week? It's inconvenient to collect recruits.
Here's a mega tip. Don't recruit anyone for a week, and on the first day of the week, take the weekly recruits. And it's almost like in the third game.
I'd be happy to play, just tell me where and when.:rolleyes:
Play this map without saving. And tell me on what day you finished it. Then we'll talk.
Barbarians have a cool castle (especially the outpost), but it's monotonous. It's not fun without magic. I'm not criticizing, I'm just pointing out what's wrong so that it can be fixed. I don't want a comparison with the 5th game, please, in the 3rd game, they have a guild of mages up to level 3. And not 5, but not 1 either. At least something.
Don't play as barbarians if you "don't know how to play them." Besides, the fourth game is good precisely because you can almost always find magic on the map - books, shrines, other cities. And you can also develop heroes in different ways.
Not because it was (and is) in other versions, but because it's stupid in itself - luck reduces damage or increases damage when a unit is attacked. Why not do the opposite? If there is no morale, the unit doesn't move - that's understandable, but here only the last one (if any) moves or the 1st (+), and otherwise, just recruit skeletons, elves, angels, etc. - it's very inconvenient. And also, if luck = 10 or morale = 10, then it's always like that - it shouldn't be, it should be random, but the more there is, the higher the probability that it will happen.
That's right. The higher the value, the higher the probability. With +10 - 100 percent. :D "It's stupid in itself" - that's not a very strong argument. You didn't provide any other arguments besides comparing it to other Heroes games.
1. Not everyone - 2. The comparison is not only with 5, but also with the other parts (2, 3). And finally, I'm not saying that Heroes 5 is better than 4, I wrote that not everything (far from everything) is ideal in 5. I think that only Heroes 3 is the best part of all the others (but it's not perfect either, but at least the situation is better than in the others).
Well, compare, compare. It's very funny to compare a game that is absolutely revolutionary in its ideas with its traditional versions. And to say that "everything is wrong there." You think the third game is the best? Many people think so. I know many very strong tournament players who love the third game and haven't accepted either the fourth or the fifth. But here's the thing. Their opinion is more interesting to me than yours. They at least don't talk about the graphics. :D
Well, you're blind (no offense). You yourself said, write your own + and - about the 4th game.
Ah... So, "write," not "napishy." :D Now I understand. :D Read the thread. Everything has already been said here. I'm unlikely to add anything new.
Who should it benefit? The main problem with all such debates is the stereotypical views they evoke, caused by the fact that people often consider the first thing they liked to be the optimal one. How many people do you know who started playing all parts of Heroes at roughly the same time and, ideally, immediately played against other players and in tournaments, because playing only against the AI significantly slows down and even distorts perception? I only know one... Let's return to the question of Luck bonuses. In all parts except the fourth, the hero is a commander. For him, the main goal is to achieve the objective – to kill the enemy and capture something. Therefore, it is logical that luck is about killing more monsters than expected. In the fourth part, the hero is a kind of warrior or mage who has taken creatures to help him, which essentially protect him. For him, it is logical to consider the primary task to be SURVIVAL, i.e., to ensure that he himself takes less damage and the protection survives. And then he will live, he will cope with the problem. Therefore, parties with several heroes go together, like a joint raid. And luck is considered to be when he was supposed to die, but survived. So, in this matter, the developers are doing a GREAT job; they adhered to the logic very strictly.
Heroes 4 is a strategy game, not an RPG where you run around as one character and kill everyone. I agree that the hero should be the main one, i.e., without a hero, the army is nothing (well, almost). I personally have played all versions of Heroes and believe me, I can appreciate each part on its merits. Luck in the 4th game is simply inconvenient, it's kind of strange; in what other games (I'm not talking about Heroes right now) is there luck of this type? It's just hard to get used to it. As for the developers, I'll say this: where is 3DO now? It doesn't exist anymore; you can thank Heroes 4 for that. Although the developers themselves are to blame; they got into debt and hoped for luck:D
Already 2 years???!!! Unbelievable... I understand mistakes. But having them in almost every other word is a bit much. And who are "some" that you're comparing yourself to? Do you know how fast someone types? Are you peeking?
Ugh, this grammar enthusiast is getting on my nerves. So what if I write like this online? What's the big deal? And where did you learn to write so well? Probably still in 5th grade:D
Yeah. There isn't. If it's "in its pure form." Is that a negative for the game? It's a huge plus. I still remember hoarding magic in the third game and winning battles of almost any difficulty without losses. Blind the last stack of enemies and fully restore your troops. It's a shame.
You killed 7 titans, and you can't do anything about it. Just sit and watch the losses, it's so cool:(
So, two are good, three are so-so, and four are just bad? :D Well done. You've really drawn a line. :D
A good strategy is when only heroes fight:confused:
You don't need an interesting game – you just need "the usual"? On one map, I'll put vampires, on another, venom. With some neutrals, griffins, with others, unicorns. This is invariance. Choice. You don't like to choose? Do you only like to do what you're told? Then just choose one monster for each Castle and don't worry. Build only them. Those who know how to play will be more mobile. That's all.
I don't need "the usual," I need something that makes me want to play the game for more than 30 minutes or an hour. And about the choice: let the choice be only for the last level (level 4), and all the others can be built. At least that way, instead of just archers or infantry, there would be a bit of everything. You need a little of everything:)
Here's a mega tip. Don't build anyone for a week, and on the first day of the week, get the weekly reinforcements. And it's all like in the third game (almost)
I know that without you. But why do the guys grow every day (not just the starting ones)? What's the point? Just for fun:D
Play this map without saving. And tell me on what day you finished it. Then we'll talk.
If you rage quit, just say so:rolleyes:
Don't play as barbarians if you "don't know how to play them." Besides, the fourth game is good precisely because you can almost always find magic on the map – books, shrines, other cities. And you can also level up heroes in different ways.
I like to play as barbarians, but if they had magic:smile51: Otherwise, a hero with an army easily defeats them with spells.
That's right. The higher the value, the higher the probability. With +10, it's 100 percent. :D "It's stupid in itself" – that's not really a strong argument. You didn't provide any other arguments besides comparing it to other Heroes.
Listen, are you blind? I wrote in Russian above that it's just strange, inconvenient, etc.
Well, compare, compare. It's very funny to compare a game that is absolutely revolutionary in its ideas with its traditional versions. And then complain that "everything is different." You think the third game is the best? Many people think so. I know many very strong tournament players who played the third game and didn't accept either the fourth or the fifth. But here's the thing. Their opinion is more interesting to me than yours. They at least don't talk about the graphics. :D
Well, you haven't provided many arguments in favor of the fourth game either. I'm not some noob, and I was already playing Heroes 2 when I was 7, and I played Heroes 3. What about you?
Ah... So, "write," not "napishy." :D Now I understand. :D You reread the thread. Everything has already been said here. I'm unlikely to add anything new.
Smartass, then don't write.
P.S. I'm not saying that Her4 is a stupid, uninteresting, or bad game. I'm just expressing "My opinion about Heroes IV." The game is actually pretty good.
Added 2 minutes ago shnurov_hl;200890
Do you know what "strategy" is?
And do you know what "RPG" is?:cool:
Amko
Auto-translated
Heroes4 is a strategy game.
Why should Heroes necessarily be a full-fledged TBS without RPG elements? In my opinion, if they are not overdone, it will be a plus for the game:smile42:
Dude, I'm already fed up with some grammar Nazi. So what if I'm writing online? What's the big deal? And where did you study? Probably still in 5th grade:D
It's nothing. I'm just used to communicating with literate people, both in life and online. I'm not very interested in illiterate youngsters. I'm 34, by the way.
They killed 7 titans, and you can't do anything. Just sit and watch the losses, it's very annoying:(
Make sure they don't get killed. :D I repeat once again - don't justify your inability to play by the lack of "necessary" spells. Many play without Resurrection. And they don't cry. Strange, right?
Good strategy, only heroes are fighting:confused:
I asked you - do you know what "strategy" is?
I don't need it the usual way, I need it so that I want to play the game for more than 30 minutes and an hour. As for the choice: let there be a choice only of the latest ones (level 4), and all the others can be built. At least like that, otherwise there are either only ranged units or infantry. I need a little of everything:)
I've been playing it since its release. I haven't gotten bored. So "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." That is, you don't like the set of 4th level monsters for the Castle? Is it too few? Well, yes. Not too many. In the 3rd game, there were 7, right? Well, that's a different game. You should learn how to manage them first.
I know that without you. But why do units grow every day (not just the starting ones), what's the point? Just for fun:D
And that's for those who know how to use it. If you don't know how, then you don't need it.
If you're drifting, just say so:rolleyes:
:D :D :D :D
I like to play as Barbarians, but if they had magic:smile51: Otherwise, a hero mage (with an army) easily defeats them with spells.
With spells? Barbarians? You're a mega-player! :D
Listen, are you blind? I wrote in Russian above that it's somehow strange, inconvenient, etc.
There are many strange and unusual things in every game world. You either accept it or you don't. Many people didn't accept the fourth game (mainly because of the heroes on the battlefield). But that doesn't make it a bad game a priori. Okay. Of all your drawbacks, we'll note the morale-luck mechanic. Argument - "strange and unusual."
Well, you didn't provide many arguments in defense of the fourth game either. I'm not some kind of noob, I played Heroes 2 when I was 7, and I played Heroes 3, what about you?
You're 20 now? When you were 7, I was older than you are now. I played the second one. I missed the first one. There weren't many computers in the country back then. :D
Smartass, then don't write anything
How can I not write when you're putting on such a show? You can't play, but you have a million-dollar vocabulary.
P.S. I'm not saying that Her4 is stupid, uninteresting, or a bad game. I'm just expressing "My attitude towards Heroes IV." The game is pretty good.
My respects. If 3DO had lived to see these words of yours, they definitely wouldn't have gone bankrupt. :D
Added 10 minutes ago
Do you know what "RPG" is?
Yes, I know. And it's stupid and absurd to deny that all games in the HMM series have role-playing elements.
Damn, I'm already tired of this grammar Nazi. So what if I write online? What's wrong with that? Where do you study? Probably still in 5th grade:D
And what's the difference between writing online and writing normally? I'll also write online however I want, and you can figure out what I mean. Illiterate writing shows your disrespect for the person you're talking to. Shurick;200894
They killed 7 titans, and you can't do anything. Just sit and watch the losses, it's very unpleasant:(
As if the "Resurrection" spell is lying around every corner in HoMM 3, right? Shurick;200894
Good strategy, only heroes fight:confused:
And isn't leveling up such heroes a strategy? Doesn't it require strategic thinking? How to place them on the battlefield, how to defeat an army 10 times larger? Shurick;200894
I don't need it the usual way, I need it so that you want to play the game for more than 30 minutes or an hour. As for the choice: let there be a choice only of the latest (level 4) units, and the rest can be built. At least like that, otherwise, either only ranged units or infantry. You need a little of everything:)
What prevents you from choosing ranged units on one level and infantry on another? The choice of creatures is a huge number of strategic opportunities. Shurick;200894
I know that without you. But why do units grow every day (not just the starting ones)? What's the point of that? Just for fun:D
From my own experience, I can say that sometimes the daily increase can be very, very helpful :) Shurick;200894
If you're drifting, just say so:rolleyes:
May you be able to play as well as he does, even half as well :) Shurick;200894
I like to play as barbarians, but if they had magic:smile51: Otherwise, a hero with magic (and an army) can easily defeat them with spells.
Yeah, with spells. Let's see how you defeat a barbarian with 100% magic resistance with spells. Shurick;200894
Listen, are you blind? I wrote in Russian above that it's strange, inconvenient, etc.
And it doesn't seem strange or inconvenient to me. And I think not only to me. And in 1-2-3-5, it's also convenient for me :) Shurick;200894
And do you know what "RPG" means?:cool:
And do you know that at the end of the second person singular verbs, a soft sign is written? :)
By the way, place of residence is not an excuse. Polosataya also lives in Ukraine. And she writes so well that some Russians are outdone. And she is only 12 years old.
It's nothing. I'm just used to communicating with literate people, both in life and online. I'm not very interested in uneducated youth. I'm 34, by the way.
I'm just used to writing like this online, what can you do?
Just make sure you don't get killed. :D I'll repeat again - don't excuse your inability to play by the lack of "necessary" spells. Many play without Resurrection. And they don't complain. Strange, right?
I'm not making excuses, I'm just saying that it would be convenient if this spell existed. And if there are 2 large armies and no losses, what then?
I asked you there - do you know what "strategy" is?
And I asked you what RPG is:D
I've been playing it since it was released. I haven't gotten bored. So, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." That is, you don't like the set of 4 monster levels per Castle? Is that too few? Well, yes. Not too many. In the 3rd game, there were 7, right? Well, that's a different game. You should learn how to manage them first.
I know how to manage them, and you don't need to criticize me. And if you have nothing else to add, then just be quiet.
But this is for those who know how to use it. If you don't know, then you don't need it.
Good answer, nothing to say.
:D :D :D :D
:D :D :D :D I told you, I'm losing it.
With spells? Barbarians? You're a mega-player! :D
So, what's the point of killing them? Hypnosis, Berserk, general slow, something like that:rolleyes:
In every game world, there are many strange and unusual things. You either accept it or you don't. Many people didn't accept the fourth game (mainly because of the heroes on the battlefield). But that doesn't make it a bad game. Okay. Of all your drawbacks, I'll note the morale-luck mechanic. The argument is "strange and unusual."
And what:cool:
Are you 20 now? When you were 7, I was older than you are now. I played the second game. I didn't play the first one. Back then, there weren't many computers in the country. :D
Imagine, I didn't have one, but my friend did (more precisely, my sister's friend).
Well, how can I not write when you're doing so well? You can't play, but you have a million-dollar vocabulary.
It's you who's the noob, I'll take you down.
My respects. If 3DO had lived to see your words, it definitely wouldn't have gone bankrupt. :D
Clever:cool:
Added after 12 minutes Stop criticizing me, I wrote the pros and cons, and I'm not trying to convince anyone. In my opinion, it's like that, in your opinion, it's like that, I didn't criticize you. I just expressed my opinion, and that's it. And by the way, I didn't mention that the 4th game is bad, it's actually pretty good, I'm playing it right now. Heroes V is also good in its own way. This is a good example of how many arguments there are about the 4th game. It's better to write your own opinion instead of criticizing mine. I can criticize too. P.S. And please don't touch my place of residence. You're all grammar nazis, I write normally, but I rush online and get used to it.
Yet again, I come across this thread and see arguments. :) Last time, it was the same with Mutra Drake... maybe we should close the thread to avoid further disputes? ;)
P.S.: Just to avoid being completely off-topic, I'll say that I played Heroes 4 for about a year, and I like this game much more than Heroes 1, 2, and 5!!!
A minor drawback, in my opinion, is that the towns are very similar (all buildings of the same type are built in the same places). Another drawback is that the heroes no longer have individuality, although in some ways, this is even a plus, in terms of balance!
The main plus is that this installment is not like the others! :smile02:
I'm just used to writing like that online, what can you do?
I suggest you retrain. I'm being nice. Others immediately put you on ignore. At least on many of the forums I know.
I'm not making excuses, I just said it would be convenient if that spell existed. But if there are 2 large armies and no losses, what then?
Either be prepared to play without losses by using spells, leveling up, and building your army, or don't attack, or play with losses. What other option is there?
And I asked you what RPG is:D
Well, let me tell you, if you don't know. A computer role-playing game (CRPG) is a computer game based on the elements of gameplay of traditional tabletop role-playing games. Heroes fall under many of the definitions of role-playing games (character progression with increased abilities, the presence of experience, etc.), but differs in the absence (completely one and partially the second) of the principle of three "U": "kill, steal, persuade".
I know how to manage, and you don't need to criticize me, and if you have nothing else to add, then be quiet.
You say you know how to manage. Fine. I'll believe you. What are your successes in Tournaments?
A good answer, nothing to say.
The answer is normal. You said that the daily increase is inconvenient "for everyone." I'm explaining to you that if you don't know how to use it, that doesn't mean it's inconvenient. You just don't use it correctly (or not at all). Good players like the daily increase in the fourth game. If you like the weekly increase, you can "make" it out of the daily one by not touching the increase for a week. If it were profitable, everyone would do it that way. But for some reason, good players use the "daily" increase in the game. So, is something wrong with you?
:D :D :D :D I told you, I'm tired.
I asked you to play a map without saves. Is that difficult? I just don't have much time to play tournament matches due to a lot of work. That's why I'm asking you not to make me spend a lot of extra (possibly) time. That's all. I don't really react to insults. I'm amused by noobs with pretensions.
So, what are you going to do? Hypnosis, berserk, general slowdown, something like that:rolleyes:
3 heroes with (let's say) 80 percent magic resistance and grand combat and melee skills. What are we going to use to defeat them? ;)
And what:cool:
Everything is fine.
Imagine, it wasn't with me, but with a friend (more precisely, with the friend of my sister).
I imagined. I started with the Agate-7. Do you know that "machine"? It had less memory than a modern mobile phone. :D
P.S. Please don't touch my writing style. You call yourselves grammar experts, but I write normally, just in a hurry online, and I'm used to it.
I'm just stating facts. If you're used to writing like that online, many will consider it disrespectful. For some reason, others manage to write properly, even when they're in a hurry. If a person is literate, haste won't prevent them from writing correctly.
P.S. And what I sometimes intentionally misspell is called "stylistic features," which are often widely accepted. Only someone who clearly writes грамотно and correctly can afford to use them in moderation.
P.P.S. A bit off-topic, but literacy is a sensitive topic for me.)))
P.P.P.S. I'm already running out of patience with you guys.))) *just got out, got exhausted, need to go back*
А, вот почему.
??+⛓️♿=?
shnurov_hl
Auto-translated
Another downside is that the heroes no longer have individual characteristics...
Listen, don't get mad, I'm just tired of writing quotes. And don't take it personally, I just don't like it when people start criticizing me. What nickname do you use in tournaments? We could play, although I'm also short on time. I have to work, study, and play. But I'd be happy to play with such a super-master like you. :D As you said, "you talk a good game," so let's see how you play in reality. And you only play Heroes 4, but we could also play other Heroes games. P.S. And leave my spelling alone, it's getting annoying.
