What is your opinion about Heroes IV?

It's nothing. I'm just used to communicating with literate people, both in life and online. I'm not very interested in uneducated youth.
I'm 34, by the way.

Just make sure you don't get killed. :D
I'll repeat again - don't excuse your inability to play by the lack of "necessary" spells. Many play without Resurrection. And they don't complain. Strange, right?

I asked you there - do you know what "strategy" is?

I've been playing it since it was released. I haven't gotten bored. So, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
That is, you don't like the set of 4 monster levels per Castle? Is that too few? Well, yes. Not too many. In the 3rd game, there were 7, right? Well, that's a different game. You should learn how to manage them first.

But this is for those who know how to use it. If you don't know, then you don't need it.

:D :D :D :D

With spells? Barbarians?
You're a mega-player! :D

In every game world, there are many strange and unusual things. You either accept it or you don't. Many people didn't accept the fourth game (mainly because of the heroes on the battlefield). But that doesn't make it a bad game.
Okay. Of all your drawbacks, I'll note the morale-luck mechanic. The argument is "strange and unusual."

Are you 20 now? When you were 7, I was older than you are now. I played the second game. I didn't play the first one. Back then, there weren't many computers in the country. :D

Well, how can I not write when you're doing so well? You can't play, but you have a million-dollar vocabulary.

My respects. If 3DO had lived to see your words, it definitely wouldn't have gone bankrupt. :D