What is your opinion about Heroes IV?

Already 2 years???!!! Unbelievable... I understand mistakes. But having them in almost every other word is a bit much. And who are "some" that you're comparing yourself to? Do you know how fast someone types? Are you peeking?

Yeah. There isn't. If it's "in its pure form." Is that a negative for the game? It's a huge plus. I still remember hoarding magic in the third game and winning battles of almost any difficulty without losses. Blind the last stack of enemies and fully restore your troops. It's a shame.

So, two are good, three are so-so, and four are just bad? :D
Well done. You've really drawn a line. :D

You don't need an interesting game – you just need "the usual"? On one map, I'll put vampires, on another, venom. With some neutrals, griffins, with others, unicorns. This is invariance. Choice. You don't like to choose? Do you only like to do what you're told? Then just choose one monster for each Castle and don't worry. Build only them. Those who know how to play will be more mobile. That's all.

Here's a mega tip. Don't build anyone for a week, and on the first day of the week, get the weekly reinforcements. And it's all like in the third game (almost)

Play this map without saving. And tell me on what day you finished it. Then we'll talk.

Don't play as barbarians if you "don't know how to play them." Besides, the fourth game is good precisely because you can almost always find magic on the map – books, shrines, other cities. And you can also level up heroes in different ways.

That's right. The higher the value, the higher the probability. With +10, it's 100 percent. :D
"It's stupid in itself" – that's not really a strong argument. You didn't provide any other arguments besides comparing it to other Heroes.

Well, compare, compare. It's very funny to compare a game that is absolutely revolutionary in its ideas with its traditional versions. And then complain that "everything is different."
You think the third game is the best? Many people think so. I know many very strong tournament players who played the third game and didn't accept either the fourth or the fifth. But here's the thing. Their opinion is more interesting to me than yours. They at least don't talk about the graphics. :D

Ah... So, "write," not "napishy." :D Now I understand. :D
You reread the thread. Everything has already been said here. I'm unlikely to add anything new.

Do you know what "strategy" is?