Posts from Mafia 111. Buruaka Auto-translated

Zlobny Yashchur and Fragment tried to find the answer to this question at the bottom of a wine bottle.

A familiar joke, huh... Thanks to Yashchur for keeping me company.

It's really strange that the Mafia decided to block on the first night instead of the second, where blocks can come from either side. Okay, we won't complain about the extra information. The second action, judging by everything, was the murder of Balzac, because there's something about intellectual reasoning written there, which doesn't sound like a princess's croaking.

What I see in the newspaper:
Hero - Romeo, killed by Balzac, Gorio blocked, Grande is chilling. Gibel investigated, which will affect the next night. There's no successful healing or protection, therefore Romeo sent Arandora on a run. Perhaps, by the way, he saved him by redirecting the murder to himself...

It's unclear where the clue is exactly. However, there aren't many options here, either in the headline or in the first sentence. The nature of the complex? Hanging? Civilization? Mental health? These are the things that catch the eye.

Is it normal that the link leads to an anime fan?

That's why I chose him, I thought it was funny against the background of the others, haha

That's what someone would say who believes that in 2023, Mafia players are too lazy to even type "hello" in the chat, let alone come up with so many strategic moves.

That's what someone would say who spends their time in Mafia chats.

By the way, Nebos, wouldn't you like to play a game of Yashur during the day?

That's what someone who spends their time in a mafia chat would say.

You guys in the mafia chat seem to have forgotten that accusing peaceful players of being in the mafia chat is a giveaway.

Added 5 minutes later

By the way, Nebos, wouldn't you want to eliminate Yashur during the day?

For now, I'm leaning towards executing Lok. The evidence is pretty solid, not too obvious and not too subtle, just right for the mafia after a long break. And the mafia will kill Yashur anyway to frame me. Unless he's a member of the mafia himself, of course.

Couldn't the Heroine have been a doctor?
We have three and a half elements: hanging, the question of civilization, and a vulnerable nature + suicide.
The description doesn't say anything about her personal kindness, although she is a nun who came to help and enlighten the natives, bringing the benefits of civilization with her, so it's all implied, and in the end, she was strangled by the rabble.
The vulnerability could be a clue, and the hanging is the murder weapon. But at the same time, the murder is also indicated in the line about the vulnerable nature, and the initial focus on "strangled by a noose" seems unnatural; logically, it's more of a clue than something someone randomly thought about while on the toilet. Moreover, if we consider "vulnerability" as one of the elements, then it must be linked either to the description of the role in the second element, or to the clue (unlikely), or accepted as an additional part of the non-functional chronicle without any hints.
As for the murderer, I could assume that "improvisation" includes some creative methods, including staging a suicide, and not just blasting the whole album of Krzysztof Penderecki into his ears, but it seems more likely that they harassed and bullied him, he got angry, and then killed himself. For now, I can't find more plausible explanations for possible descriptions of the princess's murder (for example, I suppose she could have sent the thugs, but I don't know).
It sounds bad, the frog version seems much more solid, but I'll think about it in my free time; literary descriptions could surprise us even now.

Remind me, can clues include the characters we signed up as?

Second question for the GM: are other actions in the newspaper displayed in accordance with the lore of the roles, at least approximately, or are they deliberately vague and have nothing to do with the setting?
Context of the question: it seems obvious that the bar is two blocks from the town and the mafia, but if the setting descriptions make sense, then I would rather characterize the night run as intimidation from the mafia, and the drinking then becomes an interrogation (and the bottle will come in handy) + patrol. It's also stupid in the context of the patrol, but otherwise, what does the patrol have to do with the night run of the person they were patrolling? That's also nonsense.

Added 2 minutes ago

I think we should execute the mafia member, Lok. Arandor won't be executed on the first day anyway.

And I'll say something?

The actions are described based on their effect, so they may not correspond to the descriptions of the roles in terms of plot (perhaps the newspaper's editorial staff is playing tricks...), but actions of the same type are displayed identically.

Couldn't a "Heroist" be a doctor?

He could have been. I remember the newspapers from Revnya. It's generally unclear what's going on there and who all these people are.

Are you going to reveal something?

Are you going to share something useful?

Montezuma II

I didn't come here to solve puzzles, but to criticize... I don't like it.
If we go from the hanging, then:
- Hanging

Ah, well, okay. I was already thinking that I had uncovered a hidden trick from the GM.

Are you trying to appear helpful?

No, I just don't feel like I'm in danger on the very first day.

The description doesn't say anything about her personal kindness, although she is a nun who came to help and enlighten the natives, bringing the benefits of civilization with her, so it's all implied, and in the end, she was strangled by the rabble.

Personally, I support the version where civilization is a hint that Balzac was the killer.

I would rather describe the night run as an intimidation tactic by the mafia, and the drinking then becomes an interrogation (and that's where the bottle comes in handy) + patrol.

The drinking locations are 99% identical, described the same way, so it's not clear which one is the city location and which one is the mafia location.

It's also stupid, especially in the context of the patrol, but otherwise - what do the patrol and the night run of the person being patrolled have to do with each other? That's also nonsense.

Well, Arandor was running at night (I don't know if this is a hint that he was visiting someone at night), and the perverted stalker Romeo was watching him, saw that someone was trying to kill him, and saved him. It's a nonsensical description so as not to write "HE JUMPED ON A GRENADE AND SAVED THE BOY IN HIS UNDERWEAR!"

Added 1 minute ago

Am I confessing something?
He's a man and he has immunity, but you don't.

I still tend to think that the Heroist is Romeo, whom Grande killed. Why Grande? Because Romeo hanged himself due to unrequited love, which is a hint at the role of the killer, and also because the Mafia didn't use the status check for some reason. And the clue is probably about a civilization (for example, China) and mental health (for example, Confucianism). It stands out too much.

He's a man, and he has immunity, but you don't.

You don't have it either, and if I attack you, will you cry?

Like, a nonsensical description so as not to directly write: JUMPED ON A GRENADE AND SAVED A BOY IN HIS UNDERWEAR!

He ran towards the loop, and Romeo jumped into it instead of him, so that it could no longer be used.

The actions are described based on their effect, so they may not correspond to the descriptions of the roles in terms of plot (perhaps the newspaper's editorial staff is playing tricks...), but actions of the same type are displayed identically.

Do the methods of killing at least correspond to the roles?

So, hold on, Balzac checks the status, then the second reason is a minus.

Do the methods of killing at least correspond to the roles?

Yes. They are considered different actions.

I didn't come here to solve puzzles, but to criticize... I don't like it.
If we go from the hanging, then:
- Hanging

- Decembrists

- Alexander I

- Napoleon

The same number of steps and the same level of "Berberness"...

From Montezuma to the hanged Cuauhtémoc, you can easily navigate using the links at the beginning of the Wikipedia articles. This is a specific person who was actually hanged. However, Alexander I is mentioned in the middle of a huge article about Napoleon, and then in the article about Alexander, the Decembrists are also mentioned in the middle, and the same goes for the Decembrists; in the middle of a large article, it is mentioned that they were hanged.