Stay alive!!! Auto-translated

The rating reflects both the Clan's activity and the individual's activity...

The Clan is to blame if it has a low rating...

don't take people who join once, sign up, and leave, who only registered on the forum or posted a single message on the forum.

if there are no people who play often, then was it even necessary to create a Clan? They could have joined another Clan, and the activity in that Clan would have increased...

also, regarding the leaders... if they rarely appear due to personal reasons or simply because they've given up on the forum and the Clan, then they could transfer the Clan to other hands, to one of the Clan members... then the Clan's affairs might improve, and it might become easier for them (to relieve the responsibility, so to speak)... with a new CL, recruitment of people would resume, and so on. Together with this, activity and rating would increase...

+++
And if this is a new Clan with serious intentions,
the sound of these words immediately makes me think of RAPER's activities, and if that's the case, then I respect him for it.
And without the respected IronAxe, even your Clan might have collapsed. And we would have been left with only a few Monarchical CLANS. And if they also give MODERATORS to the Clan, then...
No matter how you look at it, your words deserve a +.

No, they are not related. The strength of a Clan should reflect the strength of unity among its members. However, they are connected in the sense that even in an OFFLINE Tournament, they can "help" their clanmates. And in a Tournament where several players from the same Clan participate, and they also compete against each other, it is impossible to judge the real strength of the Clan as a community of like-minded people based on these results.

The point is that the conditions and capabilities of our forum do not allow for the development of such battles.

Personally, I can add the following:
A person who joins a Clan (and especially creates one) must be aware of their actions. A Clan is your "second" family, and you will have to dedicate some of yourself and your time to it.
In my time, I was in a Clan, although it only had 3 members, but I still devoted a lot of time to the Clan (communication, training, Tournaments, etc.). And so did every member of our Clan. We were like a family. And we achieved success (at least, that's also a result). Our Clan took 4th place in one of the city Championships (I won't say which one, to avoid advertising, but those interested can ask me privately or on ICQ), and there were (not many, not few) 26 teams participating.

2kj1313
Don't consider those who believe that clan members should participate in tournaments as your class enemies, especially if you think they are just attacking your clan. Instead, encourage your teammates to participate in the 10th stage of the VK and VV. A successful performance there will easily turn opponents into allies, and the clan will gain respect and recognition.

In what way did the administration interfere with gathering and playing 2 vs. 2 matches?
It didn't encourage it (and I'm not saying that this is ONLY a shortcoming of the Clans).

Of course, the lack of Clan battles is a huge oversight by all Clans without exception.

Those who want to, find opportunities; those who don't, find excuses.

Guys!!!
You're going in the wrong direction!
We're not discussing the possibility of holding one tournament or another, or any other battle.

We're just looking at the numbers and the decision we need to make...
The question is, what do we do with inactive clans???
What constitutes activity? I'll say it for the 100th time. It's participation in tournaments.
If there's no participation, the clan leader must explain the reason.
If there's no explanation, the clan should be removed. (There will be a certain period between decisions to give the clan a chance to leave)

I think my position is clear. I'm waiting for your feedback. But please explain in detail what you disagree with and what you would do instead.

Guys!!!
I think my position is clear. I'm waiting for your reaction. But please, explain in detail what you disagree with and what you would do instead.

These are not my personal views! This is a decision that needs to be made in one situation or another. And the fact that the decision is not in your favor is the fault of those who did not convey the essence correctly.

And regarding the open door: "please, explain in detail what you disagree with and what you would do instead." You (and not just you!) always read carelessly.

P.S.: The Guild Leader has no political or any other power. If you haven't read Alexei Pank's topic, then we have nothing to discuss.

The question was raised not by me, but by the respected Reper. And "cleaning up clans" is not the right word... it's just that a clan is not active, and the question arises as to the purpose of its existence.

to Xaker
I don't quite understand the reason for eliminating inactive clans?
Do they technically slow down the forum's performance, or are they just an eyesore?
In any case, someone responsible should determine a time frame to identify which clans are inactive and which are not (e.g., 1-3 months)... and if the issue is simply cleaning up the forum, it seems strange that they started with the clans....
Why not start by cleaning up topics like "New Year's greetings from the 'no name' clan" and so on.

I already suggested something similar, to warn the leaders of the "dead" clans about their removal, but the deadline is also not bad.

See, it was already said that if you want to deal with cleaning, focus on the dead topics – there are about 20 of them that can be permanently deleted.

Well, in that case, why the heck did you start all this nonsense? They could have deleted the clans a long time ago. I'll answer simply...