Skip to content

Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

4.3 (23 ratings)
Closed
What shall we name the establishment?
28 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
“Flooding.” Simple and effective
17.9% 5 votes
Leave it as is – “Fludnyak”
7.1% 2 votes
“A den of debauchery.” How original!
39.3% 11 votes
Brewery
17.9% 5 votes
Another option (specify in the subject line)
17.9% 5 votes
User Avatar
#40610
Auto-translated
Well, this is the internet, after all — you can argue endlessly here (I just imagined an elderly Morning waking up with the thought: "Right. A new day. I need to log into HeroesWorld and finally convince Omega. By the way, what were we originally arguing about? Oh well, never mind.")

Added after 36 seconds
My last exam is on the 24th.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
In reply to Ment
User Avatar
#40611
Auto-translated
That's the internet, you can argue endlessly here (I imagined old Mourni waking up with the thought: "Okay, new day. I need to go to the forums and finally convince Omega. By the way, what were we arguing about in the first place? But never mind, it doesn't matter.")

But I'm talking about real life! 10 minutes of arguing is enough...
Пара банок пива, снаряд дешевого пойла
Ракета прущего дыма и море свободы
Серьезные помыслы, прущие скорости, мама с вопросами:
- Куда ты дел совесть? Стань взрослым.
Я в ответ молчал виновато
- Посмотри на брата, разве трудно быть нормальным?
Им не понять меня, не поменять меня
Хотели поломать меня - им не поймать меня
В чем моя вина?
Думал бежать отсюда, хлопал дверями злобно -
Обида-паскуда
Мама била посуду и тихо плакала
Молилась за меня Богу - свечи ставила
User Avatar
#40612
Auto-translated
I wasn't responding to that. Read the second post on page 4009.
This. Or point out what.
An example of how you "take phrases out of context, ignoring others."
I was being ironic and joking. If you don't understand, don't bother. Besides, the phrases there were quite complete and fully corresponded to the originals. Moreover, it doesn't even relate to the current conversation.

The essence of what has been happening in Haven over the past day and a half:

I expressed a thesis, offended fanboys rushed in and poured a bucket of resentment and contempt on me; I left a post in which I thoroughly and neutrally substantiated my position; fanboy number one immediately dismissed it, saying that he doesn't care, la-la-la, he plugged his ears, he's not listening to you; fanboy number two left an irrelevant post and added a little fuel to the fire; fanboy number three began to use secret Tibetan methods of trolling and wanted to act like a boss, but I tried not to give in, without crossing the line into personal attacks.
And why, I wonder, should I be here, monitoring the interestingness of the argument with overquoting, when I was attacked and accused of everything imaginable? Or why should I demonstrate my superiority by not engaging in a discussion, pointing my finger at the fanboys and laughing "olololo, someone is wrong on the internet"? When I can calmly explain my position, preserving at least dignity in my own eyes, "I tried."
I feel like Arandor.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#40613
Auto-translated
Actually, you're having a perfectly normal discussion, as you're sticking to the chosen topic.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#40614
Auto-translated
Morning
This is what I mean. Or point out what exactly you're referring to.
Please. Post 40082:
Князь_OMEGA
MorningIs this a Battlecry fanboy tantrum or just another load of crap?
Where’s the tantrum? Did I say that everything sucks, and Battlecry is forever? I argued why I think Battlecry is better than parts 2-4 of Warlords.
Morning
apparently you considered your unargued tantrum/load of crap a strong argument.
If I have a tantrum, everyone will notice. If I throw in some crap, you’ll be cleaning it up for a week. And if my answer isn’t well-reasoned, then all you do is use the words “crap” and “tantrum.”
Morning
not crossing the line into personal attacks yourself
Morning
Drug addict
Morning
Drug addict
Should I comment on this?
Morning
I feel like Arandor.
So, how are you feeling?:D

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

User Avatar
#40615
Auto-translated
Knyaz_OMEGA
Is this a bat-hurt fan of Warlocks or just another instance of spreading garbage?
Turns out post #40080 belongs to me. Quite interesting.
Should I comment?
The speaker is not familiar with the subject.
Another source that allows you not to form your own opinion, but to use a ready-made one and not strain yourself.
Is this a bat-hurt fan of Warlocks or just another instance of spreading garbage?
You're just badmouthing a game you're not familiar with.
Don't even start. Especially since you still don't understand the meaning of the phrase about the drug addict.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#40616
Auto-translated
Morning
Turns out post #40080 belongs to me. Quite interesting.
Whoa, that's a problem. You're already forgetting your own post, but that's okay.
And when quoting me, you persistently skip one phrase: "it seems."

So, since you don't want to, I'm closing the discussion. I'm not going to respond to such nonsense anymore.

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

In reply to ОMEGA
User Avatar
#40617
Auto-translated
The whores attacked the guard because he wounded/killed their friend. It was impossible to clear the casino without civilian casualties, so in the end, one person had to kill everyone.
Attachments 1
1 file attached • Total size: 73.4 KB

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#40618
Auto-translated
It doesn't matter what kind of feeling it creates in you. If I tell you: it feels like you're mentally challenged, will that soften the harshness of what I said? Well, it's just a "feeling," I'm not saying it directly! I'm not resorting to personal attacks, and neither are you, of course.
Ugh, that's bad. You've even forgotten your own post, but never mind.
It's all sophistry, sophistry. Instead of answering something clearly, you prefer to evade until the very end.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#40619
Auto-translated
I also liked when I came up with a way to kill the senator in the NCR, which unfortunately didn't work out completely. I placed dynamite (and activated it) near the senator's son and asked him to run to his father. The dynamite exploded when the boy was standing next to his father. The boy was blown to pieces, but the father survived, so I had to abandon this method and just shoot him through the window.
But I'm still satisfied because my method was cunning and very cruel.

Be strong. Believe
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#40620
Auto-translated
Ugh, I can't ignore this.
Morning
Demagoguery, demagoguery. Instead of giving a clear answer to something obvious, you prefer to evade until the very end.
Let's look at the log:
Morning:I answered you with your own phrase; you said in response: "You only say 'shit' and 'butt hurt,' nothing else."
Князь_OMEGA:I didn't respond to that. Read post number two on page 4009.
Morning:To this. Or point out what exactly.
Князь_OMEGA:
Князь_OMEGA
MorningIs it butt hurt from being a Battlecraze fan or just another load of crap?
Where is the butt hurt? Did I say that everything is shit, and Battlecraze is forever? Did I argue why I think Battlecraze is better than parts 2-4 of Warlords?
Morning
It seems you considered your unargued butt hurt/load of crap a strong argument.
If I were really upset, everyone would notice. If I throw around some garbage, you'll be cleaning up for a week. And if my answer isn't well-supported, then all you do is say "shit" and "butt hurt."Morning:
Князь_OMEGA
Butt hurt from being a Warlords fan or just another load of crap?
And post #40080 actually belongs to me. How interesting.

In short, you jump from one discussion to another, shifting the blame onto me. Even though I don't deny my words, I am saying that in that specific case, I responded to something else.

If even this dialogue, which includes links as evidence, doesn't help you think a little bit, then there's nothing more I can do.

Added 1 minute ago
Ar, Fallout has no innocent victims, by the way. Because in the wasteland, there are definitely no "innocent victims."

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

In reply to Arandor
User Avatar
#40621
Auto-translated
Arandor
The whores attacked the guard because he wounded/killed their friend. It was impossible to clear the casino without civilian casualties, so in the end, one person had to kill everyone.
Is this a game of "Mafia"?:o :smile11:
User Avatar
#40622
Auto-translated
Dynamite exploded when the boy was standing next to his father. The boy was torn to pieces, while the father remained alive, so I had to abandon this method and simply shoot through the window.
It's better to use plastic explosives. My method worked.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#40623
Auto-translated
Unfortunately, all I had was dynamite.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#40624
Auto-translated
I will also address the last remaining unresolved point between us.

M: a parasitic, vile creature that feeds off Warlords.
K: is this a case of someone being overly sensitive about Warlords, or is it just spreading negativity? (This is the first mention of the first and second points in our conversation; I didn't have any of this in my original post.)
M: is this a case of someone being overly sensitive about Battlecraze, or is it just spreading negativity? (A counter-argument.)
K: no, but you don't say anything other than "garbage" and "overly sensitive." (Distorting the facts, you said it yourself, and now you're getting upset about a similar response.)
M: so, the post "is this a case of someone being overly sensitive about Warlords, or is it just spreading negativity?" belongs to me? (A counter-argument, a reminder.)
K: I didn't respond to that; I responded to this (quotes reply number three, my first counter-argument in this text).

And what were you trying to say? That you responded to me not with a counter-argument using the same method, but "just like that," "in general," when you said, "you don't say anything other than 'garbage' and 'overly sensitive'?" How did Rhevny exaggerate?... "You write that in every other message"? Is that what you meant? You probably have proof, right? Rhevny didn't provide me with proof, and he wouldn't have been able to if he had tried, because he exaggerated.

Did I understand you correctly?
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.