Quote the entire post and highlight the "bullshit" and "rage." The post has many words, but "rage" is used once, and "bullshit" is used twice. Or just explain what you liked so much about my post.
I was talking about reviews, not about game journalists, but about all sorts of "reviewers" that have proliferated on the internet.
Firstly, regarding the lack of solid arguments, provide a specific example. Is the list of Minotaur units not an argument in the question of their army composition? What, in your opinion, is a solid argument?
Thirdly, what does "fap to races" mean? I don't understand something in this life, probably, but I don't know the meaning of this phrase. I can understand "fap to an elf/dwarf girl," etc., but how can you "fap to races"? Think about the words "elf-dwarf-orc-human-races" and twitch? Ugh.
Ha-ha. In my opinion, you are deliberately focusing on the most sensitive points. Ignoring what I write about various strategies, campaigns, etc., you get upset about the phrase with the word "rage" and the assumption that you haven't played the game, or haven't played it much.
And why did you link me to a post from another topic? Is that another one of your solid arguments? Explain the meaning of this link to the quote taken out of context.