Sacred Haven of Debauchery

Ancient evil. No.

Not ancient and not evil. Lol.

You didn't understand what I was talking about, did you? A Minotaur is a single mythical creature; in games, they cleverly bypassed this by making Minotaurs multiple mythical creatures, but the Minotaur race – doesn't that seem like overkill to you?

No. In games, this has already been addressed, so why shouldn't a separate race have its own culture? Or is it better when they are slaves, as in Heroes 5, or just part of the Nihon monster army, as in the third game? But they somehow became slaves and part of the Nihon army. In games, Minotaurs are humanoid, intelligent creatures, and therefore they have their own culture and society; otherwise, they would have gone extinct long ago. So why shouldn't they be like that here? And why did the outrage focus specifically on WBC, and not on, say, Warcraft? After all, Tauren is just a deviation from the usual name; otherwise, everything is the same.

Where is the Nidhog race? Where is the Loch Ness monster race? Where is the Phoenix race? None? Let's make them, and write on the box "even more playable factions." Phoenix house, Phoenix forge, Phoenix shop, Phoenix barracks, Phoenix siege workshop.

And why? I have enough as it is. Besides, for now, these mythical creatures are used in games in isolated cases, and not elevated to the rank of a race. And they don't meet the definition of an intelligent race with its own culture. And Phoenixes were integrated into the Elemental Castle and fit well there, unlike fairies, because they are also elemental spirits.

Drug addict.

Well, now you've resorted to insults.

You correct me, add that there are not a hundred races and not two hundred classes.

You dismissed the game by saying that there are only five missions, and I told you that you are wrong. Moreover, I argued with facts, and not with empty words, as you do.

The opinion of a strategy game lover who has tried to play it several times.

As I said, you are not very familiar with the game.

Is this a Battlecry fan's outrage or just another dump of garbage?

Where is the outrage? Did I say that everything is garbage, and Battlecry is forever? I argued why I think Battlecry is better than parts 2-4 of Warlords.

I don't know why you mentioned some reviews and some game journalists three times.

You can't count. I reread my post; "game journalist review" is used exactly once.

apparently you considered your unargued outrage/dump of garbage a strong argument.

If I have an outrage, everyone will notice. If I dump garbage, you will be cleaning up for a week. And if I have an unargued answer, then you don't say anything at all except the words garbage and outrage.