Auto-translated
I support Merlin's voting system. One round.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Here's my idea: those who are definitely going to the CIS tournament (DD, Oxi, Merlin, me, and I think a few other people) should vote "I'm going regardless," because that's fair.
I find this decision very strange. If I vote for Ekaterinburg and initially intend to only go there, why should I sponsor Volgograd or Korolev if they win?
No way I'm going to Korolev to listen to Vitya's silly stories.
No way am I going to Korolev to listen to Vitya's silly tales.
If you get sick and don't check HeroesWorld for 2-3 days, you come back and see that you all just can't calm down and have already flooded the place beyond measure.
Okay, getting to the point: I'm fine with the points system (with a small discrepancy like Merlin getting 7 Dimension Door and a no-name getting 20 times less — the coefficients need tweaking, but I think Kostya will make the right decision).
Here's my thought: those who will go to the CIS event regardless (DD, Oxi, Merlin, me, and probably a few others) should vote on the "will go regardless" option, because that's fair. I understand there's a desire to push for a particular city, but for a single city vote (in my opinion), only people who would go to that city exclusively should vote (for example, LeBron who will only go to Ekb, or Lizard who will only go to Volgograd).
Why is all this needed: with this voting system, we can determine which city will gather the maximum quorum of participants, and that's one of the most important factors.
Who said we would definitely go to the CIS region?
Those who are definitely going to the CIS tournament (DD, Oxy, Merlin, me, and I think a few other people) should vote for the option "I will go regardless," because that's fair. I understand the desire to influence which city is chosen, but those who will only go to a specific city should vote for that city alone (for example, LeBron, who will only go to Yekaterinburg, or Lizard, who will only go to Volgograd).
Isn't that the whole point of multiple choice options? So you can vote for the option(s) that suit you and eliminate the ones that don't.
I find this decision very strange. If I vote for Ekb and initially plan to only go there, why should I sponsor Volgograd or Korolev in case they win?
Multiple choices... Isn't that a dream? :smile54: