Posts from TOURNAMENT TROUBLES! Auto-translated

On what basis is this considered a bug, and where is the guarantee that the AI won't use an attack on a mixed army and sometimes not lose, thereby removing upgraded units from the mixed army?

You are a bit confused...
In the first case, you really do have to kill the entire group of neutrals, even if by repeatedly attacking the last ones. That is, systematically killing all groups.
In the second case, only the unupgraded neutral units are killed, we flee, and the entire neutral group disappears from sight. Thus, in this case, the upgraded stacks are obtained "for free," and that is not good.
And the tactics end up being completely different, not identical, as you claim.

If you look at the bigger picture, either both of these features should be allowed, or both of these bugs should be prohibited.

It's up to the organizers. I think this is... not accidental, as Winnie-the-Pooh would say.

Perhaps, there is a practice on other portals.

But in any case, both of these aspects are equally difficult to check in a tournament.

And besides, even if they are mutually exclusive, there are more than enough tactical tricks in Heroes 3 without them.

And therefore, I take it calmly - in the end, everyone is in equal conditions.

Well, for example, when you were arguing with AmberSoler about "features" and "bugs." That's ridiculous. AmberSoler made it perfectly clear what, how, and why. Even a child can understand how to distinguish between these two incomparable things, but you argued until the very end.

:) He didn't explain anything. Both situations are bugs, and many people understand that. But for some reason, one situation is considered a feature, while the other is still considered a bug. And if you don't understand it yourself, don't accuse others of being stupid.

The AI sometimes uses the tactic of attacking and sacrificing units against neutrals – is that impossible? I've seen computer-controlled heroes get destroyed by neutrals, and if there's a mixed army, then according to your definition, the upgraded units will retreat. Be honest – does this happen or not? And if it does, then it means the AI is using this tactic, and you're lying again :) So, it's unclear who's actually spamming here, and now you're trying to redirect me to who knows what topic because you have nothing to counter with. All your excuses are weak :)

Yes, the AI sometimes crashes into neutrals, and in that case, I believe the neutral loses its upgraded stack.
But: the AI has no goal to weaken the neutrals in order to wipe them out with small forces later! It simply crashed and forgot where it did so, and therefore the AI is not using the bug—don't twist the words.

It just randomly does what we try to do consciously, and there is no benefit from this action for it. That's exactly what I called the AI's stupidity... :)

As for "neutral rushing" — the AI, even if by accident, uses this trick to its own benefit — it works a hundred percent. That's why we don't ban it.

This topic was settled long ago on other resources... I

have no interest in explaining this a hundred times—if you don't understand the exact difference between the concepts of "using" and "not using," then there's nothing I can do to help.

Well, as an option, after you hire the last possible hero and he completes his turn, you can save and send your save file to the host... This will be your result... And what ELSE can be done here without violating the rules? Only optimize movement so that there are enough heroes... And we all already know how to do that... :)

Therefore, the ban formulated by VDV is correct, but yours is not very well. Well, what can you do, the boss is the boss :)

VDV's wording is more accurate, I agree. We'll correct it...

So, if I understand correctly, I have the full right to buy a hero who is about to be dismissed tomorrow?