Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It's up to the organizers. I think this is... not accidental, as Winnie-the-Pooh would say.
:) I absolutely agree with that. But then they shouldn't justify their bans with some far-fetched arguments, but simply state - we are the organizers, we want it this way, and that's it. Otherwise, they start arguing that something is a feature, and something else is a bug :)Dmitry_A_S;94334
Perhaps, there is a practice on other portals.
Or maybe they simply take the rules from other portals as a basis, and if you ask the organizers why they consider this a bug and that a feature, you will get approximately the same answer with a reference to the practice of even MORE other portals.Dmitry_A_S;94334
But in any case, both of these aspects are equally difficult to check in a tournament.
I agree, but then, logically, they should both be ALLOWED for everyone to use, at least to avoid the difficulty of checking.Dmitry_A_S;94334
And besides, even if they are mutually exclusive, there are more than enough tactical tricks in Heroes 3 without them.
I agree.Dmitry_A_S;94334
And therefore, I take it calmly - in the end, everyone is in equal conditions.
I understand that when permissions and prohibitions are announced for everyone, then everyone will be in equal conditions who read them. There are no problems with this - Kyle has well described the rules for off-map in Heroes 3. I just pointed out the logical inconsistency of what they allowed and what they prohibited. Although I understand that this is the right of the organizer. But I am also not forbidden to express my opinion, moreover, Kyle himself suggests making statements about the rules in this topic. But if we take the position that the organizer will do what he wants and everyone agrees with this position, then what is the point of this "Tournament Troubles" topic and what is the point of calling on organizers to express their opinions on the rules in this topic?
I have more than convincingly shown that both of the discussed tricks are bugs. However, nothing prevents us from calling them features. But when one of them is called a bug, and the other a feature, and at the same time they cannot provide any convincing arguments for and against, then one can only be surprised by the organizers' logical twists.