Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
AmberSoler;94300If you and I do this, then it is exclusively intentional and should be punishable... If the computer does it, then only out of its own stupidity and ignorance... :D Let's not stoop to that level, shall we?You call the situation of bypassing neutrals without a penalty a "feature" (although it is a bug), and as an argument that it is a feature, you claim that the computer uses it without any problems. In the situation of eliminating neutrals from a mixed army, you already contradict your own argument and call the computer's actions stupidity. When bypassing neutrals without a penalty, you also consciously swap units around, and this should be punishable; as for the computer using this bug, that is just its stupidity :) In other words—if bypassing neutrals without a penalty is a feature, then eliminating neutrals from a mixed army is also a feature. And if eliminating neutrals is a bug, then bypassing neutrals without a penalty is even more of a bug :) Otherwise, we need to study logic according to AmberSoler :)