Posts from Eggs Auto-translated

"Look, I beat it on Impossible without any losses! One red dragon under invisibility and with devour + Armageddon is all you need! I'm incredibly awesome, aren't I?".

I didn't understand what you meant, but the technical part helped me understand the rant of one of the players on the forum when he wrote, "My Aryman on Normal turned out to be harder than on Impossible. What the...???".

Why? Breasts are rated 16+, and the difficulty of games is rated 10+. That is, to play, you need to be 16 years old with the brains of a 10-year-old. That's exactly what idiots are.

Not only normal players but also "rednecks" were dissatisfied. Because of the extremely poor balance, which created incredible difficulties at the start of the game.

Do you know the term "non-linear plot"?

Or to enjoy a good story and the atmosphere of the game.

Please be more specific. And preferably, give examples from turn-based games (they appeal to me the most).

Is this when, depending on the player's decision, the game progresses differently and ends differently?

AoW3 has a pretty good plot, and overall... It's a very appealing game in many ways.

meaningless records

But why is he a "redneck"? He figured out such a trick, which means he is at least not stupid.

I meant that, according to your words, it turns out that I just need to read the plot of a book or movie to judge them? For example, I say that "Gentlemen of Fortune" is garbage because I read the plot on the wiki and didn't like it.

Can you give an example of a game with an 18+ difficulty?

So, the problem is not in catering to "rednecks," but in the fact that the developer is incompetent?

How many people worked on this, considering it took 2 years to create all of this? Just one? Two? Three?

Because a normal player wouldn't rejoice at such a "baby-beating" scenario.

If you don't like the plot in a movie/book, what else could you possibly like about it?

I think "Impossible" mode corresponds to 18+ in terms of difficulty.

In my opinion, the answer is: "Because why pay more if the commoners will eat it up anyway?".

But he did manage it, didn't he? He figured it out? He analyzed the game mechanics, identified the weak points, and, like a master swordsman, struck them right in the heart? Is he still a "redneck" after that?

And how is this different from endlessly grinding Inquisitor Phantoms or something?

So, you read the plot on the wiki before going to the cinema, and then you can decide whether or not to go to the cinema with a clear conscience?

And how does this manifest itself? We have Alexiglu, who is 15 years old, and you claim that completing this mod will be an absolutely impossible task for him?

But it didn't sell well – so, "rednecks" aren't involved here, because they didn't start voting with their wallets for garbage instead of a game, right?

In the first case, it is impossible to lose, because the computer does not inflict any damage.

You might run out of mana.

So, the only downside of this tactic is its excessive ease, which will reduce the player's enjoyment of the game (although this depends on the player).

a normal person would say, "What are these balance issues, gentlemen?"

Yashchurmeaningless records

I beg you... Even 200 mana at the end of the game in LoD was enough for 4 Armageddons, after which only pitiful remnants of the enemy remained, even on the highest difficulty. In "War of the Ancients" with "Flame of Ice," there were about 300 at the end, I don't know about in Trials of Strength.

A normal person would say, "What are these balance issues, gentlemen?"
And only a boor is happy with this state of affairs.

The red-skinned Armageddon creature doesn't take them.

I would also, maybe, abuse it, I don't see anything wrong with that. Balance issues? Well, yes, of course. But why shouldn't I use it if I found it and it allows me to legally, without cheats, complete the game?

And if I don't like it because everything has become too easy, and I quit the game halfway through...