Skip to content

Posts from Oprosik

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Open
?
15 voters
Multiple choice
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#136
Auto-translated
But it would be great if you could go to court if necessary.
And broadcast to a bunch of people that your wife/husband is cheating on you? What a great prospect. "If necessary," family problems are resolved in other ways, not through court.
It would also be good if there were milder penalties for those who, for example, killed their wife/husband for infidelity.
Why would that be? We don't live in antiquity, and stoning is not acceptable.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#137
Auto-translated
Yes, it is customary to beat one's wife only at home.

Be strong. Believe
In reply to Arandor
User Avatar
#138
Auto-translated
Arandor
Yes, it is customary to beat your wife only at home.
What about the husband?

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#139
Auto-translated
try beating your husband.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#140
Auto-translated
I agree. You need to get rid of the husband right away. I know of such cases... x) Although they are rare.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#141
Auto-translated
try beating up your husband and see what happens
Come on, if the husband is drunk, the wife grabs a rolling pin and goes for it. It's a common situation...
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#142
Auto-translated
Oh, so you're actually in favor of same-sex marriage, Yaschur?
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
In reply to Небо
User Avatar
#143
Auto-translated
HUSBAND, DRUNK, RAISES HIS FIST, AND THE WIFE, SHE GRABS A KNIFE. THE HUSBAND, HE PULLS OUT A GUN AND GOES, "WHAT'S UP, N***A?" AND THE WIFE, SHE PULLS OUT HER OWN GUN AND GOES, "F*** YOU, N***A," AND THEY START SHOOTING. THE NEIGHBORS COME RUNNING, THEY PULL OUT THEIR GUNS, AND THEY START SHOOTING TOO. AND FOR BETRAYAL AND THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD, THEY SHOOT EACH OTHER AT POINT-BLANK RANGE. AND IF, BY SOME CHANCE, TWO PEOPLE OF THE SAME GENDER SURVIVE THE SHOOTOUT, THEY GET MARRIED. OVERALL, 10 OUT OF 10, I RECOMMEND THIS COUNTRY.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#144
Auto-translated
If only everyone could live like that.

Be strong. Believe
In reply to Граф Орлов
User Avatar
#146
Auto-translated
Alexeagle
No, I'm not suggesting that the state should control family life. But it would be great if there was a way to go to court in such cases. The only problem is that it's difficult to prove such a crime. It would also be good if there were milder penalties for those who, for example, killed their wife/husband for infidelity. But again, it's difficult to prove the fact of infidelity. Unless you put cameras all over the apartment and present the recordings... But that's just crazy.
:) I think I understand now why you like Indian women. Well, if that's the case, then it's certainly an option.

What cameras? We believe gentlemen on their word (c)
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
User Avatar
#147
Auto-translated
Ugh, get them, those damned homosexuals, traitors, whores, and incestuous people! HAKATNM!
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#148
Auto-translated
Should you announce to everyone that your wife/husband is cheating on you? That's a great prospect. In case of anything, family problems are resolved differently, not through court.
Divorce resolves them. And the reason will still be revealed. It's much better not only to divorce a not-so-faithful spouse but also to get some satisfaction from fair retribution in the form of a prison sentence/fine.
Why would that be? We don't live in antiquity, and it's not customary to stone people.
I don't quite understand. Do you think that such cases don't happen, so it's pointless to change the law, or do you think that this idea isn't very good?
E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza,
e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
User Avatar
#149
Auto-translated
Divorce is the solution.
I'm also against divorces, but your idea will only encourage them further. Something happens => immediately go to court. Court => they'll argue even more, and then divorce is inevitable.
But it's much better not just to divorce from a not-so-beloved spouse, but also to get some satisfaction from fair retribution in the form of a prison sentence/fine.
Just to satisfy your ego? Is it really necessary?
Do you think that such cases don't happen, which is why it's pointless to change the law, or do you think that this idea isn't very good?
The latter. A person should be responsible for their actions, and such indulgences don't contribute to that. It would be different if the crime was committed while intoxicated... Then the person really doesn't control themselves. But otherwise, I don't see why the punishment should be reduced. It's like... a creditor kills a debtor, and his sentence is reduced because the debtor owed him money.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#150
Auto-translated
I also oppose divorces, but your idea will only further encourage them. Something happens => immediately go to court. Court => they will argue even more, and then they will definitely get divorced.
Not for anything, but in the case of infidelity. Besides, if you really want to resolve everything, you don't have to go to court.
Second. A person must be responsible for their actions, and such indulgences do not contribute to this. It would be different if the crime was committed while intoxicated... Then the person really doesn't control themselves. But otherwise, I don't see why the punishment should be reduced. It's like, I don't know... A creditor kills a debtor, and his sentence is reduced because the debtor owed him money.
Finding out about the infidelity, it is easy to enter a state of affect, when self-control is no better than that of a drunkard. But in this case, there is no guilt of the person who has entered such a state, but the alcoholic is to blame himself, he needs to know his limits. And in general, this will not even be a full-fledged murder, but only a vigilante act.
E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza,
e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers