Oprosik

Auto-translated

I also oppose divorces, but your idea will only further encourage them. Something happens => immediately go to court. Court => they will argue even more, and then they will definitely get divorced.

Not for anything, but in the case of infidelity. Besides, if you really want to resolve everything, you don't have to go to court.

Second. A person must be responsible for their actions, and such indulgences do not contribute to this. It would be different if the crime was committed while intoxicated... Then the person really doesn't control themselves. But otherwise, I don't see why the punishment should be reduced. It's like, I don't know... A creditor kills a debtor, and his sentence is reduced because the debtor owed him money.

Finding out about the infidelity, it is easy to enter a state of affect, when self-control is no better than that of a drunkard. But in this case, there is no guilt of the person who has entered such a state, but the alcoholic is to blame himself, he needs to know his limits. And in general, this will not even be a full-fledged murder, but only a vigilante act.

E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza,
e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers

Reading content in

Interface language