Posts from Restructuring of the Academy.

First, we need to determine the number of members for the AK. Then, we can consider the candidates. I support the candidacies of Nitro and Scorpions if they intend to nominate themselves. I suggest an odd number (so that when making a decision, the votes cannot be evenly divided). I propose a composition of 9 people.

First, you need to decide on the quantitative composition of the team. And then consider the candidates.

The quantitative composition is not so critical; our team started working with 7 members, then 6, then 5, and only when there were 4 of us left, we came to the conclusion that something needed to be changed. The forum will vote for 7 members – there will be 7; the forum will vote for 5 members – there will be 5. It's not particularly critical, IMHO.
9, in my opinion, is too many.

Here's what needs to be changed in the AK regulations: The inclusion of members in the AK is decided by the current AK members. Anyone registered on HeroesWorld can apply to join the AK (to do this, write to anyone from the list above; the application will be considered as soon as possible, and the applicant will receive a response). Exclusion from the AK is done at the individual's request (withdrawal) or by a general decision of the remaining AK members. I propose: The AK is formed through a general vote on the HW forum. Players with more than one year of registration on the forum can vote. The AK is formed for a term of 1 year. Anyone registered on HeroesWorld for more than 1 year can apply to join the AK. Exclusion from the AK is done at the individual's request (withdrawal) or by a vote (we need to determine the quorum; for example, to initiate a vote to exclude someone from the AK, any forum participant on HW must apply, and this application must be supported by at least 15 (20) people. At the same time, we need to determine the replacement. The number of AK members must be fixed. Also, it is necessary to create a separate closed thread where AK decisions will be recorded to avoid controversial interpretations of the rules. For example, Dirty neutrally commented on the use of the Admiral's Hat bug, and the other AK members were not aware of this, which led to the cancellation of Redwait's game result against Nitro.

Pit, Michelle, and Dirty – I don't even think there's anything to discuss about them.)))
Today, I can't even imagine how it's possible to work on the forum without Dirty; he can still strive for more and even get a silver medal, and it wouldn't hurt to get a gold one either:p
I don't know who or what "Zloy Romantik" stepped on, but he does a lot!
I'll suggest some candidates: Tvaryna and Zhavdet, I don't think they need an introduction. Nitro is very helpful, always available, and active.

As for me, I'll pass... I don't even like to delve into my own saves, let alone others:o If someone needs to check a save for bugs, I already help with that.

Dirty_Player – in my opinion, he is currently the most helpful person on the forum; he knows almost everything about the game, is often online, and will always explain and advise. Mizrael – I haven’t interacted with him much, but he always responded and helped when I asked. злой_романтик – it’s unclear who he offended or where, but he is heroically fighting against the forum rules and deadlines. The only issue is that he once paired me with a newbie, but he also has OFB, so he’s needed. Pit_for_LM – he has moved and is probably busy, so he is less active, but it would be difficult to imagine the AK without him. KobRa, =Stinger=, and Bishop could strengthen the AK if they had the desire and time. Nitro too. These are my 7 candidates.

For any experienced and decent players from the group of those who are for SoD, those who are against the admiral's hat, etc., and so on! Dirty, Pit, Romantic, Nitro are definitely +

//By the way, I still can't understand all the hype around Rebe. I played with him in OFB last year and didn't have any problems. And Piterius has already written an election program for him in the neighboring thread//

This isn't an election program, it's just a general sympathy for his position. Rebe isn't suitable as a team player, just like Vikk, they are purely independent individuals and it's difficult for them to vote for an opinion different from their own.

I always thought that the AC in its current format, despite internal contradictions, is an organization that makes a single decision, for which everyone is responsible. In the process of work, it turned out that the opposition was often there, and only those members who voted "For" had to defend the adopted decisions. Eventually, posts like "I voted against" began to appear.
In the future, if we change the concept according to the existing vector, then an opposition is needed within the AC. All the arguments will move there, at least in their initial phase, and after the decision is made, there will be a list of who voted how, and all the "supporters" and those who are dissatisfied will understand who to be indignant with and who to admire. In this case, people like Vikk, Rebe, and Sanin would look good as an opposition in the AC, the main thing is that it doesn't turn into a "swan, cancer, and pike" situation. Considering that Dirty was the informal head of the opposition, that's already 4 people, and the opposition should be in the minority.
If we leave everything as it is, then the opposition should be outside the AC and engage in its "own business" for the amusement of the public.

As for me, I'll pass... I don't like to delve into my own saves, let alone others:o If someone needs to check a save for bugs, I'm already helping with that.

Well, that's a shame, all professions are important. If we follow a policy of flexibility, then we can distribute responsibilities and take on more organizational issues than save analysis. Just a thought.

I don't know who and what Evil Romantic stepped on, but this person does a lot!!!

I agree, he does a lot. Organizational, analytical, and technical work is consistently and qualitatively done. As for the moderation style of "everyone shut up quickly, or I'll get angry," well, I don't know, if this is the internal policy of the site owner, then there's nothing to be done about it.

Pit, Mizrael, and Dirty are the candidates who should be in the AC by default.
I would vote for Scorpiona, Tvaryna, Stinger, Javdet, Nitro, Lizard (but only as a package without personal demands for the AC, otherwise, he goes into the opposition :D)
In the opposition (if it will have the right to exist in the AC), I would see Vikk, Sanin, Rebe, Satir.
I haven't decided yet where Darka should be:p

In general, it would be good to receive information quickly during the formation of the list of candidates from those nominated by the people, whether they want it or not.

Added 7 minutes later
Regarding the number, I don't see a problem if there are, say, 9 or even 11 people, and for a quorum, 5 or 7 people gathered/voted within a certain period of time are enough. This will solve the problem of members of the AC being busy with their other affairs.

For any experienced and decent players from the group who support SoD, those who are against the Admiral's hat, and so on! Dirty, Pit, Romantic, Nitro – definitely a plus.

Nitro – doesn't he have enough experience? In making decisions?

Added 3 minutes later
My IMHO:
Dirty
Evil
Mizra
Pit
Maretti (why is he underestimated?! Or is the problem with languages?)
Hell
Sting
Ze (generally an unbiased person)

I didn't mention Peterius, Homunculus, etc., those who withdrew themselves.

I also want to comment on the following: how can a person be a judge in certain situations if they haven't been in them themselves (i.e., they are inexperienced)? Plus, a judge must be unbiased.

Generally, it would be good to receive feedback from the nominated candidates during the list formation process, to quickly determine if they are interested or not.

I am ready to help, but I share Darkello's concerns regarding the lack of serious experience.

I'm willing to help, but I share Darkello's concerns regarding the lack of serious experience.

No offense, you know I have a positive attitude towards you;)

I am willing to help, but I share Darkello's concerns regarding the lack of serious experience.

A 19-year-old guy played in the Europa League final; it's unlikely he has much experience. They simply believed in him at some point, and that's what needs to be done for the forum.

I wasn't referring to Peterius, Homunculus, etc., those who withdrew themselves.

I won't nominate myself because I don't meet the requirements due to recent instances of bad behavior. I will just read along.

I also strongly support Nitro's candidacy. He is a very calm and reasonable person, with adequate moral principles and sufficient online presence.

Nitro - isn't that a lot of experience for making decisions?

Not a little.

nitro-lacquer is good, I agree:D :D

I also strongly support Nitro's candidacy. He is a very calm and reasonable person, with adequate moral principles and sufficient online presence.

This was said by a player whose online presence is almost zero:D