Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What we have in reality: Gomunguls and Piterius withdrew, Roger DAltavilla left the forum for a crusade and didn't return. Злой_романтик, who "has been around for a long time," and Dirty_Player, who has "completely turned bronze" and, according to authoritative figures, "should have retired давно." And also, "the only people who are still adequate in the Arbitration Committee today," Mizrael and Pit for LM, one of whom has been calculating ratings for a year now. In general, it’s clearly time to change something! Therefore, it makes sense to start everything from scratch.
How can this be done? And what is the purpose of this topic? It's simple: express suggestions, wishes, etc. And most importantly, discuss candidates for the new composition: these should be people you trust to review your matches and trust in making decisions. Perhaps someone will want to nominate themselves. After the discussion, there will be a vote in the format of for/against a specific participant.
Requirements for applicants: - desire to help the forum - registration on the forum for more than 1 year
P.S.: Or maybe the Arbitration Committee has outlived its usefulness and is no longer needed? :confused:
Nitro
Auto-translated
It would be a good idea to move the list of functions, etc., to the first post, in addition to the list of members. For now, the only thing that comes to mind is that the members of the Arbitration Committee should be active. This needs to be monitored.
ICQ 627769385
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR
I nominate my top three candidates (automatic registration): 1. Darkello 2. DaU 3. rebellious
Be careful what you wish for, it might just come true!
It would be good to also move the functions and other things to the first post, along with the list of members. For now, I can only think that the composition of the AK should be active. This needs to be monitored.
Added the regulations regarding the AK to the first post.
Functions: Monitoring compliance with the rules of the "Heroes 3 - ONLINE" section.
Where can I read these rules? And why are there still half a dozen moderators in the section? Maybe the positions should be combined? Get a green nickname - welcome to the moderation team, lose the badges - goodbye...
I wanted to suggest Cobra, but I'm afraid that controversial decisions won't be resolved, not only by the end of the tournament, but even by the end of time :D But I'll probably refrain.
лето 2012.
Sanin
Auto-translated
Whenever the decisions of the Arbitration Committee (AC) are criticized, someone from the AC writes that the AC doesn't get paid for this, people work on an enthusiastic basis, and sometimes the question arises: what have you done for hip-hop in your time, and in general, achieve something first.
Given the election mechanism of the AC, where voting for new members is not conducted among players, but among the members of the AC, new members of the AC must first and foremost be loyal to the current members. Perhaps that's why last time, Roger DAltavilla, who is new to the forum, was chosen for the AC instead of Wicc, who allows himself to make critical statements. Accordingly, critics essentially have no opportunity to get involved. In this regard, the first proposal is to change the election mechanism of the AC, making the voting universal, or, for example, with a requirement based on the length of registration/number of games played. Elections should not be held frequently, for example, once every two years – this seems like a sufficient time for the officials to prove themselves.
From the current members of the AC, I would vote for Pete, Dirty, and Mizrael. This, of course, is provided that the esteemed gentlemen are willing to continue doing this.
I would also like to see people who criticized the decisions of the AC in the AC.
In my opinion, the most revealing situation was the argument about the Rebellius-Cobra match. Rebellius's arguments were then more logical than the judges' decision, and Wicc also expressed himself very consistently. So, I nominate Rebellius and Wicc. //by the way, I still can't understand the hype around Rebe. I played offline with him last year and didn't have any problems. And Peterius has already written an election program for him in the neighboring thread// I will also nominate myself – it's not just about criticizing, I can also get involved in the work.
If we talk about the parameter "willing to entrust the review of your matches and trust in making decisions," then there are not so few such people on the forum; I won't list them yet, I will vote if someone from them gets on the ballot.
ICQ 423164784
=Lizard=
Auto-translated
I nominate myself, provided that Dirty and Mizrael remain in the AK, and also provided that the AK does not, by default, include conflicting combinations, such as, for example, Ribelius and Dirty. As players, I deeply respect both of them; I have gladly invited Ribelius to join the team, but here the issue is different, and it's not entirely about the game. I think my position is clear.
Every time the decisions of the Arbitration Committee (AC) were criticized, someone from the AC would write that the AC doesn't get paid for this, people work on an enthusiastic basis, and sometimes the question would arise: what have you done for hip-hop in your time, and in general, first achieve something yourself. Given the mechanism for electing the AC, when voting for new members is not held among players, but among the members of the AC, new members of the AC must first of all be loyal to the current members. Perhaps that's why Roger DAltavilla, who is new to the forum, was chosen for the AC last time, instead of Wicc, who allows himself to make critical statements. Accordingly, critics essentially have no opportunity to take action. In this regard, the first proposal is to change the mechanism for selecting the AC, making the voting universal, or, for example, with a requirement based on the length of registration/number of games played. Elections should not be held often, for example, once every two years – this seems like a sufficient time for officials to prove themselves.
Of the current members of the AC, I would vote for Pete, Dirty, and Mizrael. This, of course, is provided that the esteemed gentlemen are willing to continue doing this. I would also like to see people who criticized the decisions of the AC in the AC. In my opinion, the most revealing situation was the argument about the Rebellius-Kobra match. Rebellius's arguments were then more logical than the judges' decision, and Wicc also expressed himself very consistently. So, I nominate Rebellius and Wicc. //by the way, I still can't understand the hype around Rebe. I played offline with him last year and didn't have any problems. And Peterius has already written an election program for him in the neighboring thread// I will also nominate myself – it's not just about criticizing, I can also get things done.
If we talk about the parameter "willing to entrust the review of your matches and trust in making decisions," then there are not so many such people on the forum, I won't list them yet, I will vote if someone from them gets on the ballot.
I agree. Perhaps, it is necessary to elect everyone by universal vote once a year or two (with some kind of requirement, of course). And let the members of the AC make decisions about the exclusion/invitation of members between "elections." As always, a thoughtful post from Sanin, unlike the clowns who rushed in: KobRa_RR, Dagr, R@sIM, Dark. Dirty_Player raised a serious issue, and you are pushing the topic into a flame war.
ICQ 627769385
Lider1
Auto-translated
We share suggestions, wishes, etc. And most importantly, we discuss candidates for the new team.
You can nominate many people, but do the nominees even want this? Has anyone asked them? What if they are nominated, and then they say they don't want it?
Regarding the candidates: I definitely think we should give those who have shown enthusiasm (or at least had it mentioned in their posts) a chance to prove themselves.
First and foremost, Darkello. With him in charge, the "Tournaments" would be closer to reality. And he has inexhaustible initiative. Let's also try Smaleny Vovk.
Second (as far as I know), one of his best friends is Satir. For balance.
Sanin volunteered, okay. I support it. Initiative, desire... go for it.
Of the old guard, I support Pit and Dirty. Their "work" is hidden from the public, so I can't comment on their activity. I have nothing against Mizrael. I don't know if he wants it. I have no idea if he's interested or not. At least he doesn't edit posts often. So, if he's up for it, yes. If not, then no.
The same goes for Vik. I don't know if he wants it, or if he's more interested in throwing insults in the forums when he gets the chance. I have no idea.
I'm definitely against Romantic. He's a purely technical candidate with his own "style of moderation," which is pompous and personally annoying to me.
However, he has another positive quality: he runs "Tournaments" well. I mean, he keeps track of deadlines, which is also very important. That's a strong point.
Rebellius - I'm not hiding my dislike for this wonderful person. 100% NO.
If anyone is thinking something like "why don't you do it yourself, if you're so good," I don't need that. Let's pave the way for ambitious and proactive people.
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/ За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
YES, sorry, I couldn't resist, I made a joke, I thought VIK would pick it up with a crossed-out boot...:D but here I see everyone is serious, so let's get down to business: What do I see as the ideal candidate for the AC (Arbitration Committee): first, it should be an authoritative, fair player (for example, Tyoma Stinger or Lesha bayazet). Furthermore, among other things, he should have a sufficient, regular amount of free time (Sasha Tvaryna, Zhenya Redwait, Tosha Hellight...) and be ready to deal with controversial situations and listen, adequately reacting (Pyotr Pit4LM, Misha Mizrael, Kostya Dirty...) to sometimes justified criticism from dissatisfied, pessimistic opponents! So, nominate yourselves and nominate thoughtfully!
kalababa
Auto-translated
leave as is
злой_романтик
Auto-translated
My IMHO – I would invite Stinger, Tvarina, Scorpion, and probably Nitro to join the current members of the AC (Pit, Dirty, Mizrael). I don’t want to nominate myself – if you think it’s necessary, I’ll continue my work; if not, then that’s fine. I already have enough problem-solving and arguments in my own tournaments and with my own platform.
296524052 Весна 2012.
Сатир
Auto-translated
I'm ready to stand my ground and help the forum.
Added after 31 seconds Lider1
the second one (as far as I heard) is one of his best friends, Satyr. For balance.
Dirty_Player
