Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
If the infection were displayed without a nickname, it would probably be written as "displayed as a fact," or not?
Yes, I'm also interested in this. Let's wait for Nebo to answer. It seems that the point of infection is that, unlike murder, it happens quietly and unnoticed. There is no corpse or evidence yet, but the deed is done, and sometimes this is beneficial. But if it were displayed with a nickname, what would be the point? Because then the doctor would visit the infected player on the next night and cure them. At least in other mafia games, the nickname was displayed at the moment the player died, not when they were infected. Therefore, I think it will be the same here. But we will find out soon.
However, it’s clear anyway. The sky isn’t Revan, and everything should be more or less obvious here. Killing the Mafia members failed; they encountered a role with immunity to infection, it happens. As for the last sentence in the newspaper:
...At midnight, someone stumbled upon human remains and immediately hurried away, taking no action...
It’s not a Necromancer. Necromancers don’t run away from corpses. Someone stumbled upon a dead soldier while using a Night Blade.
Yes, I'm also interested in this. Let's wait for Nebo to respond. It seems like the point of infection is that, unlike murder, it happens quietly and unnoticed. There's no corpse or evidence yet, but the deed is done, and sometimes that's beneficial. But if the nickname were displayed, what would be the point? Because then the doctor would visit the infected player on the next night and cure them. At least in other mafia games, the nickname was displayed at the moment the player died, not when they were infected. So, I think it's the same here. But we'll find out soon.
I think so too. But there are no nicknames in the newspaper... Or am I misunderstanding?
For example, this: the Mafia killed/infected an infected player, unsuccessfully. Plus, two non-displayed actions were performed – a check and a redirect. This is a quite plausible scenario, although personally, I don't think it's the most likely. As for who could have been blocked from the town, there are many possibilities.
It's just that the point of infection is that, unlike murder, it happens quietly and unnoticed.
Maybe the reason is that you can't cure someone from Necro's infection.
Mafia 3 has 3 Night Actions. If you were them, who would you target and what would you do?
In my opinion, the most advantageous scenario for them is: 1. Infect with Necro or Rat, because the first one is incurable, and there's no evidence for the second. - and I don't see this Night Action. 2. Bite with Infected - it shows that this is probably what we see in the newspaper. 3. Redirect with Infected - the Infected has 2 Night Actions, and redirection isn't shown.
So, Mayhayness is definitely Mafia, even if Olam says that infection is shown, I don't see the second Mafia Night Action.
Какую бы чушь ты не нес, в ней всегда есть крупица правды.
I think so too. But there are no nicknames in the newspaper... Or did I misunderstand?
Well, my point is that it could have been a failed attempt at infection. Or maybe even a murder... Haven, when natural defense triggers, does the attempted murder with a nickname get displayed?
They don't even need to kill them; they'll all die from hitting the corpse. Tomorrow we'll find out who the unlucky guy was who visited the Necropolis.
I would, in the Mafia's place, use the Rat to infect (since it can't be blocked and there's no evidence... you couldn't ask for better!). I would redirect it to the infected, and most likely bite them myself... I definitely wouldn't switch the bite for a check (especially with the risk!).
Added 4 minutes later But my suggestion didn't appeal to the Mafia, apparently, since they didn't use the Rat. Everyone is different; they probably have some other logic. Maybe Ursula is right, and they started killing/infecting Necro. By the way, I think it's more likely they're killing him. To get an immediate result. That's quite possible!
If someone was playing as Johnny Depp, then it seems the player was planning to quickly eliminate one of the Dark Elves from the game. Also, some players don't like using poison and prefer regular attacks, although in this case, it might not be the best option.
Arandor, that's true. Many people don't like to wait; they want to see the results of their actions immediately. Perhaps you've convinced me... for now, let's execute MyHighness.
Added 5 minutes later
By the way, someone stumbling upon a corpse was practically inevitable. Most likely, this is the result of a redirection. Who else could the Mafia have redirected the attack to?
Exactly, the idea is great! Until they redirect someone with visible ND, he will scream in the thread that he was redirected at night, and on the next night, he will actually die from the infection, his role will be revealed, and everyone will understand... But by that time, they will have already managed to re-infect a lot of people. Haven, are clues given on the corpse?
Ment
kcfgogbfalgfl
