Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
If the infection were displayed without a nickname, it would probably be written as "displayed as a fact," or not?
Yes, I'm also interested in this. Let's wait for Nebo to answer. It seems that the point of infection is that, unlike murder, it happens quietly and unnoticed. There is no corpse or evidence yet, but the deed is done, and sometimes this is beneficial. But if it were displayed with a nickname, what would be the point? Because then the doctor would visit the infected player on the next night and cure them. At least in other mafia games, the nickname was displayed at the moment the player died, not when they were infected. Therefore, I think it will be the same here. But we will find out soon.