Skip to content

Posts from Forum

1.0 (1 rating)
In reply to ariputra
Auto-translated
ariputra

ahaha, you can laugh yourself sick, so funny.

Tell me please, why are you laughing here? while my PM box is all:
Why not the other way around?

Well, anyway:

And really, what is there to fear? For 3 buckets of compact crap in PMs, you will not even get points.
O Brave Warrior of Heroes World.
______________



__________________

Truth can sometimes look very unexpected! ;-)


How did you manage to draw such conclusions from what I wrote?

I hasten to make you happy
Items 1 through 3 do not have to be done; all you need is:

1) not become a drug addict, 2) not drink yourself to death, 3) not plunge headlong into debauchery, 4) not perish from another wave of mass vaccinations, 5) not lose your culture, 6) protect your children from all of this.

Everyone thinks of others according to what he himself is like ;-)

I have no hatred for them; they are merely executors of our karma who voluntarily took this burden upon themselves. But that does not mean we should obediently put our heads into the guillotine (drug addiction, alcoholism, debauchery, and vaccination) that they have prepared for all of us.


All are souls of God, and naturally they are too (everyone is simply conditioned differently), but I cannot love them for ruining such a country, flooding Russia with drugs, making the people drink, and corrupting the youth. Through the TV series “Univer”, for example, they convince young people that being, excuse the expression, a faggot is perfectly normal. Are we supposed to love them for that?


Yes, you are right, I really do write illiterately, and I apologize for that.

But please explain to me how we say, pronounce it: poidyosh, or poidesh?

What is this rule based on? It would be one thing if it were based on the etymology of the word. But in this case, why should one write a soft sign after sh?

Spelling should be based on the etymology of words for the purpose of their further correct pronunciation, while today’s rules are based on who knows what, and constantly change besides.

And then it turns out you check spelling in Word, meaning it is not even you yourself writing so literately, yet you reproach me for lacking knowledge of Russian :) You are a funny person, though :)

And in general, what Russian language are you talking about?
1) In pre-Christian Rus, in Old Slavic written language, there were 147 letters, as in modern Sanskrit.
2) 1000 years ago the benefactors of all Rus, two Greek Jews, Cyril and Methodius, shortened it to 53 letters.
3) Under Peter the First, to 47, then to 43.
4) Under Nicholas II, to 37.
5) During the USSR, to 33.
6) Now they want to reduce it to 28.
7) Ideally, our Yid government wants to reduce our alphabet to 24 letters, as in modern Hebrew.

And turn us into Ellochka the Cannibal, reducing our vocabulary to 30 words.

Of everything I have read, there is no more Nazi philosophy than the one described in Shulchan Aruch.

What you write shows that we are all swimming in a history specially rewritten for us.

Hitler was also a half-Jew; if you are interested, of course, read Mein Kampf: compared with Shulchan Aruch, Mein Kampf is childish mischief. In Mein Kampf, Hitler (Schicklgruber) writes that he knows power in tsarist Russia, as in Germany at that time, was seized by Yids; there he also writes that he wants to help the brotherly Russian, Slavic people rid themselves of Yid domination.

An Aryan is a person striving for perfection. It is not a nation at all.

Both Germans and Slavs are Aryans, Aryans, Aryas by definition, nominally, because both they and we are descendants of Aryans. At that time Germany and Russia were the two mightiest powers both militarily and economically, while America, under the rule of Yids, was not such a power then. So they decided to pit two Aryan empires against each other, making a tidy profit on blood and guts.


Did the fascists win? Did they not win? Are they not sitting in the Kremlin now? The president, prime minister, the entire government are all Yids (pure-blooded and half-breeds; well, that is their division, not mine), while the state-forming nation, the ethnos, is the Slavs, the Russians.
In what other country in the world is it like that?????

If Hitler had won that war, people in Russia would now live much better in every respect! In the territories he managed to capture, he allowed peasants to continue farming freely, gave peasants loans to continue agriculture, and did not destroy Orthodox or Christian churches, unlike our Yid government. He did not touch the people. And at the beginning of the war the people did not want to and did not participate in it (Shudras, workers, are not supposed to participate in war). But the Yid government dragged the people into that meat grinder too. At the cost of the people’s guts and blood, the Yid government defended the power it had “honestly” seized.


Yes, I write illiterately, I have to admit it. I will try. But how does that relate to the topics we are discussing???

After all, there was a time when neither you nor I could wipe or wash our own asses and we soiled ourselves. Shall we look at each other from that position?! :)

_____
Aryans, Arii, Aryas - “people striving for perfection” and Russia. Where is the contradiction?

_____
Every day new and new warriors arrived on the battlefield of Kuru-Kshetra, 99% of whom died on the battlefield that same day. Who was there to feed?
At night the corpses were removed and burned.
All the kings of the world participated in that battle. Please name at least one logical reason why 650 million warriors could not have gathered from all over the world?
What historical (IsToric) source tells us the number of people living at the beginning of Kali Yuga, which began a little over 5000 years ago, at the time when this battle took place?
_____
How, from the laws of physics, a theory with a huge number of contradictions with practice, does it follow from those described laws that it is impossible to throw an elephant into orbit?
Plus, you do not take into account an enormous number of nuances and factors.

For example, the fact that Bhima possessed mystical power, whose influence on the studied and currently known laws of nature has not been studied or researched at all.


Whoever wants to find a flaw will definitely find one ;-)

As confirmation I am posting “Forbidden Archeology”, which has collected an enormous amount of archaeological evidence.

As evidence I refer to Holy Scriptures, which also have a huge amount of archaeological confirmation.

Moreover, if you think otherwise, please, I do not mind.

How does everything you wrote imply that this is impossible?
Are you an expert in this field, in the influence of speeds on elephant bodies?
Where does it follow that warriors of the past could not throw an elephant to the height needed for it to hang there for 5000 years? And that it would be torn apart in the process?



Everyone believes; only some believe in God, in God-revealed scriptures, in the experience of past generations that matches the holy scriptures one to one. And others believe in their own mind, in the idea that one must under no circumstances use an already invented bicycle, wheel, or the eternally existing laws of God, but must invent one’s own bicycle, wheel, and laws.


First, what does not add up? If something does not add up in our mind, that does not yet mean anything. Or is our mind the final authority in the search for truth?


Hundreds of thousands of these photographs were taken even before Photoshop.
Were the testimonies of people, tens of thousands of eyewitnesses around the world, also made in Photoshop?


This makes it possible to understand that modern man is far from the crown of nature and creation.

This makes it possible to understand that in the past there were people who surpassed me in size, intellect, memory, and qualities of character.

Of course, if all of this is true, then against their background I become so small and insignificant, and that causes me suffering, so I cannot accept it even theoretically. I defend myself.

______
And the thoughtless, baseless denial of everything that does not fit my understanding is, naturally, correct!


Faith is complete conviction in something based on knowledge.

How wonderfully you turned everything upside down.

Listening to you, all Holy Scriptures, the Bible, the Quran, the Vedas, Buddhist sutras, and so on, are all nonsense and the ravings of a gray mare, and hundreds of millions of people who believe in God according to their understanding are lost idiots.

And official science, which over some 100 years changes its testimony on practically every question it studies, is the most authoritative source of knowledge. And television, of course. There can certainly be no doubt about it.

And atheists are generally the crown of creation, the crown of human reason and logic, the embodiment, the culmination of common sense.

__________________
I think everyone will agree that our gross physical body, the organism, is an extremely complex biological system; therefore it must have a creator, a chief designer, and therefore he must also have instructions for operating it and interacting with surrounding reality.

Holy Scriptures, whose essence has not been perverted or distorted, are the instructions from the chief designer (God) for operating our gross physical body and the subtle-material mental body. And the purpose of these instructions is to reduce our suffering, to help the living being itself, the soul that never dies, realize its spiritual nature, rid itself of fear and envy, and be happy.

No one will argue that everyone wants to be happy; we simply all have different understandings of happiness.
______________________
So the myths of ancient Greece are nonsense and ravings too, therefore Troy, sung of in the Iliad, is nonsense as well!

And Heinrich Schliemann, a self-taught archaeologist, the bastard, went and found it! And destroyed the entire previous logical chain.

Therefore other events described in the Iliad also had a real basis!

And the Iliad was written by Homer based on the Srimad Bhagavatam, which is part of Vedic literature, whose texts have found hundreds of thousands of archaeological confirmations.
_______________________

But if you say that, then take some statement from the Quran, from the Bible, from Vedic literature, and prove that it is nonsense, only please do it scientifically. Otherwise you are just a chatterbox and windbag!



Every family has its black sheep!
There are priests who use their position for their own gain.
And there are Fathers who are capable of dying for their faith, for God, for people!

______
Beer has made so many bellies lately, oh oh oh!



Truth for us can sometimes look very unexpected!
Because all of us have already formed our own ideas about truth!

___________________________
The thing is that neither you, nor I, nor anyone here is an expert in physics! But we reason here like experts!
How can we give any expert conclusions or judgments in this case?

___________________________
Modern physics is one continuous fraud, in which theory is dragged by the ears to practice by means of coefficients.

coefficient is a coefficient of unknownness, uncertainty, introduced on unclear grounds in order to bring, to drag theory into correspondence with practice.

Today “Physics” cannot explain very simple phenomena that we observe every day:

1) Boiling water - according to physics, a bubble cannot arise because the surface tension of the bubble is more than 1000 atmospheres, and the amount of energy needed to turn water into vapor (a water molecule into the vapor phase) is 13 times greater than the average kinetic energy of liquid molecules. That is, modern physics theory contradicts phenomena we can all observe.

2) Physics cannot explain why an airplane flies - because the lift force of today’s airplanes is 10 times greater than the theoretically possible lift force[/B]

3) Hydro-phonics - today physics cannot explain why, in hydro-phonics, products (nuclei, elements) arise in the soil that were not present in the original substances in the fertilizers, in the air, or in the soil.

4) Mollusks - today physics cannot explain why some mollusks develop a chitin shell under conditions where there is no calcium, when chitin contains calcium.

5) Lightning - modern physics theory cannot explain it

And so on.

So how can we rely on such a theory of “Physics”, which contradicts practice and reality???
______________________________________________________________

Where does it follow that warriors of the past did not possess such power?
For us now this is naturally unimaginable, impossible!!!

Plus, one must take into account that Bhima and the other warriors described in the Mahabharata are not ordinary persons! Do not compare them with you, with me, with us! These personalities are Maharathas, great warriors capable of deciding the outcome of a battle alone.

You are doing mathematical and physical calculations and derivations, but are you sure you have accounted for all components, all factors?

The Mahabharata describes that Bhima possessed the strength of ten thousand elephants. That is, it is not the strength of muscles alone, though elephants also have muscles.

It is a certain mystical power. There are a huge number of examples when a fragile, delicate woman, very weak and puny in terms of muscles, seeing her child trapped under a car, easily overturned 1-2 ton cars or even threw these cars several meters. Where does a woman with hardly any muscles get such strength?

Does modern physics say what units mystical power is measured in?

Modern physics is one big continuous fraud!
In which theory is dragged by the ears to reality by means of all sorts of coefficients!

There are so many inconsistencies in physics theory that you can just turn out the lights.

Plus, why do you not take into account that heating of an object when entering the dense layers of the atmosphere and when leaving them are two different processes, occurring with different heating and different temperatures.

When leaving the dense layers of the atmosphere, objects do not heat up as critically as when entering.

Plus, the laws of physics described in modern theory are in that same theory dragged by the ears to reality by means of coefficients.

Plus, these laws are not fully applicable to that situation; mystical powers remain completely unaccounted for.

___________
And how does everything you wrote imply that warriors of the past, in particular Bhima, could not possess such power (mystical power)?

How does what you wrote imply that the elephant would be torn apart? Are there experiments proving this?

Is any of us an expert in the influence of speed and acceleration on the body of a human or elephant (and besides, those were war elephants, not like now)? Where does it follow that it would be torn apart?
______________________________________________________

Well, if you consider this complete nonsense (impossible in principle), then fly there, check it, refute it.
not only is it a stream of nonsense, but to scroll through and read it I also “lost” 20 minutes of my time
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

User Avatar
Auto-translated
ariputra
Alright, go ahead. Provide the mathematical and physical calculations, taking into account all factors, that demonstrate why this is fundamentally impossible.

Dude, it's not my job to provide them; it's yours.
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
Auto-translated
Heinrich Schliemann.
User Avatar
Auto-translated
It's a rather absurd position. Ariputra makes a statement and then says, "Prove to me that it's not true."

Usually, the person who makes a claim provides evidence to support their words. Otherwise, they are considered a bluffer.

Ariputra, however, believes the opposite, that others should prove him wrong and calls those who disagree with his opinion bluffers. With complete confidence that it is up to them to prove him wrong.

:smile40: :smile40: :smile40:

The "logic" is astounding.

:D :D :D
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
In reply to aka.Ward3n
User Avatar
Auto-translated
aka.Ward3n
It's not just a stream of nonsense; it also took me 20 minutes to scroll through and read it, which I feel like I've "lost."

It's very easy to dismiss something as nonsense – anything that doesn't fit into my understanding of things, of reality! It's a natural defense mechanism. I can understand you, but I don't agree.

Please explain your point of view.
Nonsense #1 – why? and your point of view.
Nonsense #2 – why? and your point of view.
and so on.

Lider1

Attention! Ariputra will respond soon. This is how he responds to all posts and anything related to life in general. Wisdom and elephants, battles of 1 billion, alternative history, and a certain mystical power all come from there. Everything is within the general field of meaning. Watch to the end! in 480

He wasn't too lazy, did you see? He uploaded a video to YouTube and even named it after my name :) In a 5-minute video, the guy is high and starts having hallucinations:
Are you subtly hinting that everything I write is the hallucinations of a drug addict? :)

Everyone thinks about others as they are themselves ;-)

Lider1

It's a pretty absurd position. Ariputra makes a statement. Then he says, prove to me that it's not true.

And again, you twisted everything.

First of all, that's not what I say.
I disagree, you think differently, that's fine, I'm not against it.

But if you call something nonsense, please provide some arguments.
Lider1

Usually, a person who makes a statement justifies their words. Otherwise, they are considered a braggart.

Ariputra, on the other hand, believes that the opposite is true: that others should prove him wrong and calls those who disagree with his opinion braggarts. With complete confidence that they should prove it to him.
:smile40: :smile40: :smile40:
"Logic" is amazing.

:D :D :D

But I do provide various evidence, in the form of the book "The Unknown History of Humanity" with a huge amount of archaeological facts, in the form of Heinrich Schliemann, who found Troy, which was considered a myth, a fairy tale, in the form of the discrepancy between the theory of physics and practice, in the form of Sacred Scriptures (the Bible, the Quran, etc.) - which also have a huge amount of archaeological evidence. At the same time, I do not insult anyone or anyone's position.

And I'm not asking you to disprove the statements I made here; I'm just asking you to provide at least some arguments in favor of the fact that it's nonsense.

I only call you a braggart – well, excuse me, you gave me ample reason for that – you call the Bible, the Quran, etc. nonsense without any basis or arguments, and then you start throwing insults at me – well, you have no right to complain about my insults after everything you wrote to me.

Another question is that you don't agree with this, please, I'm not against it.

I'm not telling you: here's a fact – prove to me that it's not true, disprove it.
I'm asking you to disprove or prove not my words, but yours! If you call something nonsense, rubbish, or unreal, then please provide at least some arguments.

____________________________________

Please provide at least one logical proof that at that time, in a war in which all the kings of the world participated, there could not have been 650 million soldiers? If there are none, then don't call it nonsense, that's all I ask.


These certain mystical powers or mystical perfections are quite specific:

8 main mystical perfections:
In Sanskrit, mystical perfections, sensory abilities are called siddhis. There are 8 main mystical abilities and several dozen secondary ones.

1) Anima-siddhi – this is the ability to become smaller than the smallest, the ability to become small. This quality is called scaling, that is, a person can change their scale using a certain process. A person can become small, smaller than the smallest, even reduced to the size of an atom. Every person once possessed these abilities. This is why we have such a feeling, you probably noticed in childhood: "Oh, if I could become small, I would crawl through." If a person did not have these abilities in the past, or they were not inherent in him, then he would not even be able to think: "I would become small and pass." That impulse, which allows us to think that we can become small, is nothing more than our subconscious experience... in the form of the subconscious, this memory bursts out, but the body is already different.

2) Laghima-siddhi – means becoming lighter than a feather or lighter than air, the ability to levitate, antigravity, that is, to rise, fly, walk on water. Christ walked on water – this is a manifestation of laghima-siddhi, that is, the ability to change the gravitational fields of the body.

3) Prapti-siddhi – this is the ability of a person to get anything and from anywhere. Imagine: once – and a person has some object in his hand. He gets it through certain ethereal channels. In another place, the object disappears and appears in his hand. But if you don't know what it is, you will think that he created this object. He doesn't create it, but gets it – this is prapti-siddhi.

4) Mahima-siddhi – the ability to become heavier than the heaviest. The last mention of such an ability: there was such a Gaichitahei, one of the masters of martial arts. As far as I remember, he died in 1985. He publicly demonstrated his abilities on television. His weight was 52 kilograms, but he could, standing directly on the scales, increase his weight to three hundred kilograms and reduce his weight to 15. When he became 300 kilograms, people could not move him. He was barely lifted, but his body did not change. This is a manifestation of mahima-siddhi.

5) Ishitva-siddhi – to create or destroy something at will. This is when you can create objects and translate them into a destroyed state – that is, you don't have to touch anything, just think about it. This happens with the help of certain internal sound vibrations. You repeat certain mantras to yourself and translate your body into a special vibrational field. Certain vibrations are associated with sound. Sound is both subtle and rough. Perhaps you know that if you tap on a faceted glass and find the corresponding note, and then reproduce it, saying: "Ga!", the glass breaks into small pieces. Even now, people who do not have special abilities know that you can affect any object by sound vibration, and it can be destroyed.

6) Vashita-siddhi – the ability to control all material elements and subordinate other people to one's will. Now, such sensory abilities are demonstrated to some extent by psychics, hypnotists. The range of these abilities is related to the karma of a living being. Therefore, we see: someone flies half a meter, at best, someone runs on water... materializes objects. All this is considered extinct abilities, now almost no one has them. That is why Christ says in the Bible: "What shall I say to you, when even to grow by an elbow you cannot?"

7) Prakamya-siddhi – the ability to fulfill any material desires of other living beings. As, for example, in fairy tales, a genie or a goldfish appears and says: "Give me three wishes, I will fulfill them." The person makes a wish – and they are fulfilled.

8) Kama-vasayita-siddhi – the ability to take any form at will, that is, a person can turn into not only living beings, but also into material objects.
Дурман мирской любви сильнее яда кобры, он глупым может сделать мудреца и увести от цели благородной и дух и волю война храбреца.
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации
In reply to ariputra
Auto-translated
ariputra
It is very easy to call everything that doesn't fit into my understanding of things and reality "nonsense"! It's a natural defensive reaction. I can understand you, but I cannot agree.

Please lay out your vision of the matter.
Nonsense №1 - why? and your vision of the matter.
Nonsense №2 - why? and your vision of the matter.
and so on.



You weren't too lazy, were you? You threw some video on YouTube, and even named it after me :) In a 5-minute video, a guy got high and started having hallucinations:
is this your subtle way of hinting to me that everything I write is a drug addict's hallucinations? :)

Everyone thinks of others as they are themselves ;-)
____________________________________

Please provide at least one logical proof that at that time, in the war in which all the kings of the world participated, there could not have been 650 million warriors?

These certain mystical forces or mystical perfections are quite concrete:

8 main mystical perfections:
In Sanskrit, mystical perfections or sensory abilities are called siddhis. There are 8 main mystical abilities and several dozen secondary ones.

1) Anima-siddhi – this is the ability to become smaller than the smallest, the possibility to become tiny. Such a quality is called scaling, meaning a person can change their scale using a certain process. A person can become small, smaller than the smallest, shrinking even to the size of an atom. Every person once possessed these abilities. This is why we have this feeling, which you surely noticed in childhood: "Oh, if only I could become small right now, just zip through." If a person had not had these abilities in the past, or if they were not embedded in them, they wouldn't even be able to think: "I would become small and pass through." That impulse that allows us to think we can become small is nothing other than our subconscious experience... in the form of the subconscious, this memory breaks out, but the body is already different.

2) Laghima-siddhi – means to become lighter than a feather or lighter than air, the possibility of levitation, anti-gravity, that is, to rise, fly, walk on water. Christ walked on water – this is a manifestation of laghima-siddhi, that is, the ability to change the gravitational fields of the body.

3) Prapti-siddhi – this is the ability of a person to get anything from anywhere. Imagine: snap – and an object appears in the person's hand. He retrieves it through certain etheric channels. The object disappears from one place and appears in his hand. But if you don't know what this is, you will think that he created this object. He doesn't create it, he retrieves it – this is prapti-siddhi.

4) Mahima-siddhi – the ability to become heavier than the heaviest. The last mention of such an ability: there was a Gaichitahei, one of the martial arts masters. As far as I remember, he died in 1985. He publicly demonstrated his abilities on television. His weight was 52 kilograms, but while standing right on the scales, he could make himself as heavy as three hundred kilograms or reduce his weight to 15. When he became 300 kilograms, people could not move him. They could barely lift him, but his body did not change. This is a manifestation of mahima-siddhi.

5) Isitva-siddhi – to create or destroy something according to one's will. This is when you can create objects and transition them into a destroyed state – that is, you don't need to touch anything, it is enough to simply think about it. This happens with the help of certain internal sound vibrations. You repeat certain mantras to yourself and transition your body into a special vibrational field. Certain vibrations are linked to sound. Sound is both subtle and gross. Perhaps you know that if you tap a faceted glass and find the corresponding note, and then reproduce it by saying: "Ga!", the glass shatters into small pieces. Even now, people who do not possess special abilities know that you can influence any object via sound vibration, and it can be destroyed.

6) Vashita-siddhi – the ability to control all material elements and subject other people to one's will. Currently, such sensory abilities are demonstrated to some extent by psychics and hypnotists. The range of these abilities is linked to the karma of the living being. Therefore we see: someone flies half a meter, at best, someone runs on water... materializes objects. All of this is considered faded abilities; almost no one has them now. That is why Christ says in the Bible: "What is there to talk to you about, when you cannot even grow by an elbow?"

7) Prakaamya-siddhi – the ability to fulfill any material desires of other living beings. For example, as in fairy tales, a genie or a goldfish appears and says: "Make three wishes, and I will fulfill them." The person makes a wish – and they come true.

8) Kama-vasayita-siddhi – the ability to take any form by one's will, meaning a person can transform not only into living beings, but can even transform into material objects.

I don't want to write kilometer-long posts, so I'll just say, your knowledge of aerodynamics and physics is simply deplorable, and having read something on the internet, you try to show that there is "God's will" behind it under the pretext that it is supposedly unexplainable. One could dig up a million such imho proofs, and oh by the way, physics is a science that is not yet fully studied.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

User Avatar
Auto-translated
ariputra

Well then why do you make any assertions, call something nonsense, rubbish, which later become completely unnecessary to you?
I call it nonsense and rubbish because you don't back up your words. And as long as it's unsubstantiated, it is nonsense and rubbish.
ariputra

As proof, I cite the holy scriptures — which have a huge amount of archaeological evidence, which have been tested by time, by millions of people, or are these people in your eyes also lost idiots?

I'm not saying all believers are idiots. There are many smart people, including scientists, who believe in God or something like that. But the delusional ones who deny the basic laws of physics, who will say, yes physics is a pseudoscience, there is no gravity, there is a holy scripture in Vedic literature that denies it — those are indeed idiots.

And the Earth is the center of the universe, and the sun revolves around it, right ariputra?
ariputra

Modern physics is one big continuous hoax!
In which theory is forcibly stretched to fit reality by means of all sorts of coefficients!
ariputra

Plus, those laws of physics described in modern theory are themselves forcibly stretched to fit reality by means of coefficients.

Some sneaky, deceitful coefficients, no other explanation, the damned Jews invented them :D

What you wrote about the elephants doesn't fit in my understanding. You were asked to substantiate it mathematically, but besides
ariputra

It's very easy to call it nonsense — everything that doesn't fit into my understanding of things, of reality! A natural defensive reaction.
ariputra

Based only on the fact that something doesn't fit into our understanding of reality.

you couldn't write anything. And we need facts, not stories told around a campfire.

To all the questions that ariputra is unable to explain, the answer goes roughly like this:
ariputra

something doesn't fit into our understanding of reality.

Who are you to consider your opinion correct? Isn't that funny? :D
ariputra

You are doing mathematical and physical calculations, computations, but are you sure you have taken into account all the components, all the factors?

So maybe then you'll carefully calculate, take all factors into account, and prove that it did happen?
Lider1

Newton invented mechanics
ariputra

So it didn't exist before him?

Wrongly expressed. Didn't invent, but DISCOVERED Naturally these laws worked before him, and will work after.

ariputra

Plus you have to consider that Bhima and the other warriors described in the Mahabharata are — not ordinary individuals! Don't compare them to you, to me, to us! These individuals — they are Maha-rathis, great warriors capable of deciding the outcome of a battle single-handedly.

I know who that was, that was a leveled-up commander from WoG :D

Lider1

Everyone thinks of others as they are themselves ;-)

Lame. I heard that from a teacher in first grade. You still think in such categories, sad. Takes one to know one, yeah

Added after 4 minutes
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Warden

your knowledge of aerodynamics and physics is simply deplorable

Please share your non-deplorable knowledge on this matter.
Warden
and you, having read something on the internet, are trying, under the pretext that it is supposedly inexplicable, to show that there is a "divine will" behind it.

Yes, you are right, there is a lot of information on the internet, both accurate and inaccurate.
But everything I wrote, I did not take from the internet. And where do you get the information that you accept as truth, with or without verification?

Modern materialistic science makes new discoveries every 10 years.

Yes! Even a tiny speck of dust will not move without God's will!
But this does not mean that it is inexplicable. Everything is explainable.

To Lider1:
You are starting to take my phrases out of context. Well, that's okay.

I am talking about what I consider interesting, and I provide various evidence. If you disagree with them, that's fine, I don't mind.

But you just start calling it nonsense, so please provide some arguments with which I can either agree or disagree, but you don't provide any at all.
Lider1

But the PGM-infected (Pro-Orthodoxy of the Brain), who deny elementary laws of physics, who will say that physics is a false science, that there is no gravity, that there is a sacred scripture in Vedic literature that denies it, - these are idiots.
These elementary laws of physics - as described in the theory - contradict practice.

Vedic literature denies nothing! It only speaks of different depths of understanding of a particular issue, without insulting anyone.

Physics only describes the laws of God for the material world; it does not create them!
No one denies any laws; only descriptions that are not suitable for them are denied.

In modern physics theory, there are a huge number of inconsistencies, discrepancies between theory and practice:

Today, "Physics" cannot explain very simple phenomena that we observe every day:
Doctors of science in the field of physics themselves admit that there are many inconsistencies and discrepancies with practice in modern physics theory.
But when they are asked why nothing changes, they answer directly: If we admit this, then we will have to rewrite school and university textbooks, can you imagine what that would be like? Candidate and doctoral degrees, positions will be lost.

1) Boiling water - according to the current theory of physics, a bubble cannot arise because the surface tension of the bubble is more than 1000 atmospheres, and the amount of energy needed to turn water into steam (a water molecule into a vapor phase) is 13 times greater than the average kinetic energy of liquid molecules. That is, modern physics theory contradicts phenomena that we can all observe.

2) Physics cannot explain why an airplane flies - the lift of today's aircraft is 10 times greater than the lift theoretically possible (according to the current theory of physics).

3) Hydro-phonics - today physics cannot explain why, in hydro-phonics, products (nuclei, elements) appear in the soil that were not in the original substances in the fertilizers, in the air, in the soil.

4) Mollusks - today physics cannot explain why some mollusks have a chitinous shell in conditions where there is no calcium, when chitin contains calcium.

5) Lightning - modern physics theory cannot explain it.

And so on.

The question of "uncertainty coefficients" remains open - what are they for? and on what basis are "uncertainty coefficients" introduced into the formulas?

_________________________________________________________________
You allow yourself to insult people only because they have a different point of view than you do on theological issues, and this speaks to your level of culture, which you have repeatedly proven to me. I am not against someone being an atheist; it is their right, but this does not give me the right to insult them. You have decided that you have the right to insult people whose point of view on theology does not match yours.


_____________________________________
Okay, this is all turning into a farce.

Time will tell who was right and who was wrong.
Дурман мирской любви сильнее яда кобры, он глупым может сделать мудреца и увести от цели благородной и дух и волю война храбреца.
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации
In reply to ariputra
User Avatar
Auto-translated
ariputra

But you're just calling it nonsense, so give me some arguments that I can either agree with or disagree with, but you don't provide any at all.

Nonsense about elephants.
ariputra

I provide various pieces of evidence.

Let's see the evidence! How did elephants fly at cosmic speeds without burning up, having their trunks ripped off, or being torn apart?

Added 1 minute later
Or is it going to be another
ariputra

The main problem, in my opinion, is the rigidity of our thinking (especially mine); for us, our ideas, even if they are wrong, are more valuable than anything else in the world.

kind of answer?
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Well, I disagree, please. I don't mind, but I've already answered some of the questions you asked above. But how does your disagreement give you the right to insult people who have a different point of view than yours? You keep doing it! I'm telling you that there are many inconsistencies in physics, and I'm giving specific examples, and you're calling me an idiot for that! :) ______ Time will tell who was right and who was wrong.
Дурман мирской любви сильнее яда кобры, он глупым может сделать мудреца и увести от цели благородной и дух и волю война храбреца.
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации
User Avatar
Auto-translated
"Pravoslavie" wasn't written by me :D :D. If you wanted to provide an explanation of PGM, you should have given a link instead. Moving on. I'm not talking about unexplored areas, and I'm not denying their existence. I'm talking about things that are quite explainable. It's just a mechanic. It's like an elephant flying into Earth's orbit.
ariputra
I've already answered all the questions you asked above.
I didn't see the answers.
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
In reply to ariputra
User Avatar
Auto-translated
ariputra

So who is this lawgiver then? Newton? or maybe after all it's God - the general designer of nature, of this universe.
Or maybe such a complex structure as the universe formed on its own?
And you, like, think that God is the general designer of this universe? No, I'm not against faith, faith in itself is a useful thing, if of course it isn't perverted by all sorts of sectarian movements and doesn't go beyond the bounds of normal human ethics. To believe or not to believe is everyone's right. For me, faith is most likely a state of the soul, faith in the triumph of justice, faith in honor, dignity, kindness, compassion. Faith in the good sense of the word helps in moments of despair, gives strength in moments of weakness, but all this is personal, it's inside, it's only mine. When you talk about God, you are no longer talking about faith, but about religion — a special form of understanding the world, conditioned by belief in the supernatural, which includes a set of moral norms and types of behavior, rituals, cultic actions, and the unification of people into organizations (church, religious community) — and this is what is personally alien to me. Religion was invented by people and invented primarily in order to usurp faith, to subjugate the masses. I don't think I'll be original or open your eyes when I say that for religion, because of religion, and in the name of religion, throughout the entire history of mankind, far more people have died and been destroyed than in all wars combined, and they continue to be destroyed to this day. Crusaders in the name of God destroyed hundreds of thousands of Muslims, Muslims in the name of Allah destroyed hundreds of thousands of Christians and Jews, Catholics mutually destroyed Huguenots, Sunnis continue to mutually destroy Shias, the list could go on and on. People invented God, and people killed in the name of God, which is why — for me personally, faith and religion are different things. Returning to the quote from your post, God cannot be the general designer of nature, much less of this universe, for one simple reason: he was invented by people. As people evolved, the dealers of religion moved God further and further away, opposing science and progress in every way because they understood that sooner or later they would have to explain where he had gone; in the end, God was relocated to heaven, but the 20th century arrived, the era of space exploration, and alas, to the misfortune of religious figures, no traces of God's habitation were found in space. I am in no way trying to prove anything to anyone; I am for faith in the good sense of the word, as they say, blessed is he who believes, but one can and should believe without religious fanaticism and obscurantism.
As for spelling, I've always been tolerant of people who make three mistakes in a three-letter word on a fence, but I didn't much care for people who make one mistake in a complex word and then take a stance demanding proof of why it should be written that way and who even invented this spelling. If you follow the logic of these people, you could run a red light, run over and kill a person, get out of the car, and demand to carpet the person who invented the damn traffic rules.
"Шанс есть всегда, но не везде." ;)
In reply to ariputra
User Avatar
Auto-translated
ariputra
Today, physics cannot explain very simple phenomena that we observe every day:
Doctors of science in physics themselves admit that there are many inconsistencies and discrepancies with practice in modern theories of physics.
But when they are asked why nothing changes, they answer directly: If we acknowledge this, then we will have to rewrite school and university textbooks; can you imagine what that would be like? Doctoral and professorship degrees and positions would be at risk.
1) Boiling water – according to the current theory of physics, a bubble cannot form because the surface tension of the bubble is more than 1000 atmospheres, and the amount of energy needed to turn water into steam (a water molecule into a vapor phase) is 13 times greater than the average kinetic energy of liquid molecules. That is, modern physics theory contradicts phenomena that we can all observe.
2) Physics cannot explain why an airplane flies – the lift of today's aircraft is 10 times greater than the lift theoretically possible (according to the current theory of physics).
3) Hydroponics – today, physics cannot explain why, in hydroponics, products (nuclei, elements) appear in the soil that were not present in the original substances in the fertilizers, in the air, or in the soil.
4) Mollusks – today, physics cannot explain why some mollusks have a chitinous shell in conditions where there is no calcium, when chitin contains calcium.
5) Lightning – modern physics theory cannot explain it.
Today it cannot, tomorrow it will explain. And much of what it has explained today seemed beyond comprehension just yesterday. Scientific thought does not stand still; everything has its time, although people like you have long since found explanations for everything: "It is all God's will."
"Шанс есть всегда, но не везде." ;)
In reply to ariputra
User Avatar
Auto-translated
ariputra
8 basic mystical perfections:
In Sanskrit, mystical perfections, sensory abilities are called siddhis. There are 8 main mystical abilities, and several dozen secondary ones.
1) Anima-siddhi is the ability to become smaller than the smallest, the ability to become small. This quality is called scaling, that is, a person can change their scale using a certain process. A person can become small, smaller than the smallest, even shrink to the size of an atom. Every person once possessed these abilities. This is why we have such a feeling, you probably noticed it in childhood: "Oh, if I could become small, I would crawl through." If a person did not have these abilities in the past, or they were not inherent in him, then he would not even be able to think: "I would become small and pass." The impulse that allows us to think that we can become small is nothing more than our subconscious experience... in the form of the subconscious, this memory bursts out, but the body is already different.
2) Laghima-siddhi means becoming lighter than a feather or lighter than air, the ability to levitate, antigravity, that is, to rise, fly, walk on water. Christ walked on water - this is a manifestation of laghima-siddhi, that is, the ability to change the gravitational fields of the body.
3) Prapti-siddhi is the ability of a person to get anything from anywhere. Imagine: once - and a person has some object in his hand. He gets it through certain ethereal channels. In another place, the object disappears and appears in his hand. But if you don't know what it is, you will think that he created this object. He does not create it, but gets it - this is prapti-siddhi.
4) Mahima-siddhi is the ability to become heavier than the heaviest. The last mention of such an ability: there was such a Gaichitahei, one of the masters of martial arts. As far as I remember, he died in 1985. He publicly demonstrated his abilities on television. His weight was 52 kilograms, but he could, standing directly on the scales, increase his weight to three hundred kilograms and reduce his weight to 15. When he became 300 kilograms, people could not move him. He was barely lifted, but his body did not change. This is a manifestation of mahima-siddhi.
5) Ishitva-siddhi is the ability to create or destroy something at will. This is when you can create objects and translate them into a destroyed state - that is, you do not need to touch anything, just think about it. This happens with the help of certain internal sound vibrations. You repeat certain mantras to yourself and translate your body into a special vibrational field. Certain vibrations are associated with sound. Sound is both subtle and coarse. Perhaps you know that if you tap on a faceted glass and find the corresponding note, and then reproduce it, saying: "Ga!" - the glass breaks into small pieces. Even now, people who do not possess special abilities know that they can affect any object through sound vibration, and it can be destroyed.
6) Vashita-siddhi is the ability to control all material elements and subordinate other people to their will. Now, such sensory abilities are to some extent demonstrated by extrasensories, hypnotists. The range of these abilities is related to the karma of a living being. Therefore, we see: someone flies half a meter, at best, someone runs on water... materializes objects. All this is considered extinct abilities, now almost no one has them. Therefore, Christ says in the Bible: "What should I talk to you about, when you can't even grow an inch?"
7) Prakamya-siddhi is the ability to fulfill any material desires of other living beings. As, for example, in fairy tales, a genie or a goldfish appears and says: "Let's have three wishes, I will fulfill them." A person makes a wish - and they are fulfilled.
8) Kama-vasayita-siddhi is the ability to take any form at will, that is, a person can transform and not only into living beings, he can even transform into material objects.
And what is this in general, what is it for, and how is it connected with reality?
"Шанс есть всегда, но не везде." ;)
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Everyone thinks others are like themselves ;-)
This is one of your rare statements, Ariputra, that is impossible to disagree with. Apparently, that's why you have such a negative opinion of Jews and the Russian Orthodox Church. Regarding physics: it can't possibly be wrong! Everything is explained perfectly! If you can't explain it, that doesn't mean anything.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil