Auto-translated
ahaha, you can laugh yourself sick, so funny.
Tell me please, why are you laughing here? while my PM box is all:Why not the other way around?
Well, anyway:
And really, what is there to fear? For 3 buckets of compact crap in PMs, you will not even get points.
O Brave Warrior of Heroes World.
______________
__________________
Truth can sometimes look very unexpected! ;-)
How did you manage to draw such conclusions from what I wrote?
I hasten to make you happy
Items 1 through 3 do not have to be done; all you need is:
1) not become a drug addict, 2) not drink yourself to death, 3) not plunge headlong into debauchery, 4) not perish from another wave of mass vaccinations, 5) not lose your culture, 6) protect your children from all of this.
Everyone thinks of others according to what he himself is like ;-)
I have no hatred for them; they are merely executors of our karma who voluntarily took this burden upon themselves. But that does not mean we should obediently put our heads into the guillotine (drug addiction, alcoholism, debauchery, and vaccination) that they have prepared for all of us.
All are souls of God, and naturally they are too (everyone is simply conditioned differently), but I cannot love them for ruining such a country, flooding Russia with drugs, making the people drink, and corrupting the youth. Through the TV series “Univer”, for example, they convince young people that being, excuse the expression, a faggot is perfectly normal. Are we supposed to love them for that?
Yes, you are right, I really do write illiterately, and I apologize for that.
But please explain to me how we say, pronounce it: poidyosh, or poidesh?
What is this rule based on? It would be one thing if it were based on the etymology of the word. But in this case, why should one write a soft sign after sh?
Spelling should be based on the etymology of words for the purpose of their further correct pronunciation, while today’s rules are based on who knows what, and constantly change besides.
And then it turns out you check spelling in Word, meaning it is not even you yourself writing so literately, yet you reproach me for lacking knowledge of Russian :) You are a funny person, though :)
And in general, what Russian language are you talking about?
1) In pre-Christian Rus, in Old Slavic written language, there were 147 letters, as in modern Sanskrit.
2) 1000 years ago the benefactors of all Rus, two Greek Jews, Cyril and Methodius, shortened it to 53 letters.
3) Under Peter the First, to 47, then to 43.
4) Under Nicholas II, to 37.
5) During the USSR, to 33.
6) Now they want to reduce it to 28.
7) Ideally, our Yid government wants to reduce our alphabet to 24 letters, as in modern Hebrew.
And turn us into Ellochka the Cannibal, reducing our vocabulary to 30 words.
Of everything I have read, there is no more Nazi philosophy than the one described in Shulchan Aruch.
What you write shows that we are all swimming in a history specially rewritten for us.
Hitler was also a half-Jew; if you are interested, of course, read Mein Kampf: compared with Shulchan Aruch, Mein Kampf is childish mischief. In Mein Kampf, Hitler (Schicklgruber) writes that he knows power in tsarist Russia, as in Germany at that time, was seized by Yids; there he also writes that he wants to help the brotherly Russian, Slavic people rid themselves of Yid domination.
An Aryan is a person striving for perfection. It is not a nation at all.
Both Germans and Slavs are Aryans, Aryans, Aryas by definition, nominally, because both they and we are descendants of Aryans. At that time Germany and Russia were the two mightiest powers both militarily and economically, while America, under the rule of Yids, was not such a power then. So they decided to pit two Aryan empires against each other, making a tidy profit on blood and guts.
Did the fascists win? Did they not win? Are they not sitting in the Kremlin now? The president, prime minister, the entire government are all Yids (pure-blooded and half-breeds; well, that is their division, not mine), while the state-forming nation, the ethnos, is the Slavs, the Russians.
In what other country in the world is it like that?????
If Hitler had won that war, people in Russia would now live much better in every respect! In the territories he managed to capture, he allowed peasants to continue farming freely, gave peasants loans to continue agriculture, and did not destroy Orthodox or Christian churches, unlike our Yid government. He did not touch the people. And at the beginning of the war the people did not want to and did not participate in it (Shudras, workers, are not supposed to participate in war). But the Yid government dragged the people into that meat grinder too. At the cost of the people’s guts and blood, the Yid government defended the power it had “honestly” seized.
Yes, I write illiterately, I have to admit it. I will try. But how does that relate to the topics we are discussing???
After all, there was a time when neither you nor I could wipe or wash our own asses and we soiled ourselves. Shall we look at each other from that position?! :)
_____
Aryans, Arii, Aryas - “people striving for perfection” and Russia. Where is the contradiction?
_____
Every day new and new warriors arrived on the battlefield of Kuru-Kshetra, 99% of whom died on the battlefield that same day. Who was there to feed?
At night the corpses were removed and burned.
All the kings of the world participated in that battle. Please name at least one logical reason why 650 million warriors could not have gathered from all over the world?
What historical (IsToric) source tells us the number of people living at the beginning of Kali Yuga, which began a little over 5000 years ago, at the time when this battle took place?
_____
How, from the laws of physics, a theory with a huge number of contradictions with practice, does it follow from those described laws that it is impossible to throw an elephant into orbit?
Plus, you do not take into account an enormous number of nuances and factors.
For example, the fact that Bhima possessed mystical power, whose influence on the studied and currently known laws of nature has not been studied or researched at all.
Whoever wants to find a flaw will definitely find one ;-)
As confirmation I am posting “Forbidden Archeology”, which has collected an enormous amount of archaeological evidence.
As evidence I refer to Holy Scriptures, which also have a huge amount of archaeological confirmation.
Moreover, if you think otherwise, please, I do not mind.
How does everything you wrote imply that this is impossible?
Are you an expert in this field, in the influence of speeds on elephant bodies?
Where does it follow that warriors of the past could not throw an elephant to the height needed for it to hang there for 5000 years? And that it would be torn apart in the process?
Everyone believes; only some believe in God, in God-revealed scriptures, in the experience of past generations that matches the holy scriptures one to one. And others believe in their own mind, in the idea that one must under no circumstances use an already invented bicycle, wheel, or the eternally existing laws of God, but must invent one’s own bicycle, wheel, and laws.
First, what does not add up? If something does not add up in our mind, that does not yet mean anything. Or is our mind the final authority in the search for truth?
Hundreds of thousands of these photographs were taken even before Photoshop.
Were the testimonies of people, tens of thousands of eyewitnesses around the world, also made in Photoshop?
This makes it possible to understand that modern man is far from the crown of nature and creation.
This makes it possible to understand that in the past there were people who surpassed me in size, intellect, memory, and qualities of character.
Of course, if all of this is true, then against their background I become so small and insignificant, and that causes me suffering, so I cannot accept it even theoretically. I defend myself.
______
And the thoughtless, baseless denial of everything that does not fit my understanding is, naturally, correct!
Faith is complete conviction in something based on knowledge.
How wonderfully you turned everything upside down.
Listening to you, all Holy Scriptures, the Bible, the Quran, the Vedas, Buddhist sutras, and so on, are all nonsense and the ravings of a gray mare, and hundreds of millions of people who believe in God according to their understanding are lost idiots.
And official science, which over some 100 years changes its testimony on practically every question it studies, is the most authoritative source of knowledge. And television, of course. There can certainly be no doubt about it.
And atheists are generally the crown of creation, the crown of human reason and logic, the embodiment, the culmination of common sense.
__________________
I think everyone will agree that our gross physical body, the organism, is an extremely complex biological system; therefore it must have a creator, a chief designer, and therefore he must also have instructions for operating it and interacting with surrounding reality.
Holy Scriptures, whose essence has not been perverted or distorted, are the instructions from the chief designer (God) for operating our gross physical body and the subtle-material mental body. And the purpose of these instructions is to reduce our suffering, to help the living being itself, the soul that never dies, realize its spiritual nature, rid itself of fear and envy, and be happy.
No one will argue that everyone wants to be happy; we simply all have different understandings of happiness.
______________________
So the myths of ancient Greece are nonsense and ravings too, therefore Troy, sung of in the Iliad, is nonsense as well!
And Heinrich Schliemann, a self-taught archaeologist, the bastard, went and found it! And destroyed the entire previous logical chain.
Therefore other events described in the Iliad also had a real basis!
And the Iliad was written by Homer based on the Srimad Bhagavatam, which is part of Vedic literature, whose texts have found hundreds of thousands of archaeological confirmations.
_______________________
But if you say that, then take some statement from the Quran, from the Bible, from Vedic literature, and prove that it is nonsense, only please do it scientifically. Otherwise you are just a chatterbox and windbag!
Every family has its black sheep!
There are priests who use their position for their own gain.
And there are Fathers who are capable of dying for their faith, for God, for people!
______
Beer has made so many bellies lately, oh oh oh!
Truth for us can sometimes look very unexpected!
Because all of us have already formed our own ideas about truth!
___________________________
The thing is that neither you, nor I, nor anyone here is an expert in physics! But we reason here like experts!
How can we give any expert conclusions or judgments in this case?
___________________________
Modern physics is one continuous fraud, in which theory is dragged by the ears to practice by means of coefficients.
coefficient is a coefficient of unknownness, uncertainty, introduced on unclear grounds in order to bring, to drag theory into correspondence with practice.
Today “Physics” cannot explain very simple phenomena that we observe every day:
1) Boiling water - according to physics, a bubble cannot arise because the surface tension of the bubble is more than 1000 atmospheres, and the amount of energy needed to turn water into vapor (a water molecule into the vapor phase) is 13 times greater than the average kinetic energy of liquid molecules. That is, modern physics theory contradicts phenomena we can all observe.
2) Physics cannot explain why an airplane flies - because the lift force of today’s airplanes is 10 times greater than the theoretically possible lift force[/B]
3) Hydro-phonics - today physics cannot explain why, in hydro-phonics, products (nuclei, elements) arise in the soil that were not present in the original substances in the fertilizers, in the air, or in the soil.
4) Mollusks - today physics cannot explain why some mollusks develop a chitin shell under conditions where there is no calcium, when chitin contains calcium.
5) Lightning - modern physics theory cannot explain it
And so on.
So how can we rely on such a theory of “Physics”, which contradicts practice and reality???
______________________________________________________________
Where does it follow that warriors of the past did not possess such power?
For us now this is naturally unimaginable, impossible!!!
Plus, one must take into account that Bhima and the other warriors described in the Mahabharata are not ordinary persons! Do not compare them with you, with me, with us! These personalities are Maharathas, great warriors capable of deciding the outcome of a battle alone.
You are doing mathematical and physical calculations and derivations, but are you sure you have accounted for all components, all factors?
The Mahabharata describes that Bhima possessed the strength of ten thousand elephants. That is, it is not the strength of muscles alone, though elephants also have muscles.
It is a certain mystical power. There are a huge number of examples when a fragile, delicate woman, very weak and puny in terms of muscles, seeing her child trapped under a car, easily overturned 1-2 ton cars or even threw these cars several meters. Where does a woman with hardly any muscles get such strength?
Does modern physics say what units mystical power is measured in?
Modern physics is one big continuous fraud!
In which theory is dragged by the ears to reality by means of all sorts of coefficients!
There are so many inconsistencies in physics theory that you can just turn out the lights.
Plus, why do you not take into account that heating of an object when entering the dense layers of the atmosphere and when leaving them are two different processes, occurring with different heating and different temperatures.
When leaving the dense layers of the atmosphere, objects do not heat up as critically as when entering.
Plus, the laws of physics described in modern theory are in that same theory dragged by the ears to reality by means of coefficients.
Plus, these laws are not fully applicable to that situation; mystical powers remain completely unaccounted for.
___________
And how does everything you wrote imply that warriors of the past, in particular Bhima, could not possess such power (mystical power)?
How does what you wrote imply that the elephant would be torn apart? Are there experiments proving this?
Is any of us an expert in the influence of speed and acceleration on the body of a human or elephant (and besides, those were war elephants, not like now)? Where does it follow that it would be torn apart?
______________________________________________________
Well, if you consider this complete nonsense (impossible in principle), then fly there, check it, refute it.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D
Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser
Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир
Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser
Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

Why not the other way around?


