Well then why do you make any assertions, call something nonsense, rubbish, which later become completely unnecessary to you?

I call it nonsense and rubbish because you don't back up your words. And as long as it's unsubstantiated, it is nonsense and rubbish.

As proof, I cite the holy scriptures — which have a huge amount of archaeological evidence, which have been tested by time, by millions of people, or are these people in your eyes also lost idiots?

I'm not saying all believers are idiots. There are many smart people, including scientists, who believe in God or something like that. But the delusional ones who deny the basic laws of physics, who will say, yes physics is a pseudoscience, there is no gravity, there is a holy scripture in Vedic literature that denies it — those are indeed idiots.

And the Earth is the center of the universe, and the sun revolves around it, right ariputra?

Modern physics is one big continuous hoax!
In which theory is forcibly stretched to fit reality by means of all sorts of coefficients!

Plus, those laws of physics described in modern theory are themselves forcibly stretched to fit reality by means of coefficients.

Some sneaky, deceitful coefficients, no other explanation, the damned Jews invented them :D

What you wrote about the elephants doesn't fit in my understanding. You were asked to substantiate it mathematically, but besides

It's very easy to call it nonsense — everything that doesn't fit into my understanding of things, of reality! A natural defensive reaction.

Based only on the fact that something doesn't fit into our understanding of reality.

you couldn't write anything. And we need facts, not stories told around a campfire.

To all the questions that ariputra is unable to explain, the answer goes roughly like this:

something doesn't fit into our understanding of reality.

Who are you to consider your opinion correct? Isn't that funny? :D

You are doing mathematical and physical calculations, computations, but are you sure you have taken into account all the components, all the factors?

So maybe then you'll carefully calculate, take all factors into account, and prove that it did happen?

Newton invented mechanics

So it didn't exist before him?

Wrongly expressed. Didn't invent, but DISCOVERED Naturally these laws worked before him, and will work after.

Plus you have to consider that Bhima and the other warriors described in the Mahabharata are — not ordinary individuals! Don't compare them to you, to me, to us! These individuals — they are Maha-rathis, great warriors capable of deciding the outcome of a battle single-handedly.

I know who that was, that was a leveled-up commander from WoG :D

Everyone thinks of others as they are themselves ;-)

Lame. I heard that from a teacher in first grade. You still think in such categories, sad. Takes one to know one, yeah

Added after 4 minutes