Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Турнир "ФБ-6" -> Tournament "The Final Battle - 6"
I disagree here; obviously, if you are playing with someone you know at least within the game world, generally speaking, someone whose word you wouldn't doubt—but with a guy you've never seen, from another resource, with a "foggy" reputation... and even in the case of "one of your own," how many misclicks or deviations will it take before you're done. I believe tournament play is tournament play; there were times when I entered Dragon Utopia with 1 bone because I wasn't used to the HD mod version where the hero swap after exchanging armies changed... then I left—thanks for the game.
If you don't trust them, there is absolutely no point in playing offline (meaning if not in a club at the next computer under the supervision of onlookers).
It's a bit clumsily worded, but I understood your point. I thought you were talking about it in general... but in a LAN setting, it would be silly not to allow it.
It's written a bit awkwardly, but I understood the point.
Thanks for being so understanding. But if you're such an incredibly correct writer, maybe you can explain to me, the simpleton, what this means: HellLighT
I also don't understand how you can put a casual game on the same level as a tournament. You play a casual game just to have fun, that's why you have auto-saves and can restart the game 100 times. But in a tournament – I'm sorry, you need to use your restarts thoughtfully. If you didn't find the chocolate, confirm the loss.
Someone says that "claiming a win on turn 111 isn't heroic." But in my opinion, begging for a Priest or an auto-win is not heroic either. If the opponent offers it himself, then take it, but if he doesn't, then confirm the loss. Although, personally, I wouldn't feel comfortable knowing that I formally lost, and then playing for a win and, in case of victory, submitting a report. And since I can't allow myself to do that, the opponent shouldn't either. In my opinion, ethics are different for everyone.
The reasoning is correct in relation to chocolate/no chocolate, but the conclusions are in relation to block/no block. That's how it is. Ethics cannot be different for everyone; each situation has details and nuances that shape the final decision. According to the rules, it's one thing, according to ethics, it's another. If they ask for an auto-win in a situation where the probability of it happening is the same as yours, and you don't give it, then what kind of ethics are we talking about? Hooray! Thank God it wasn't me who got unlucky! And if you give it, then why worry that they won't give it to you or that they'll post a victory?
Something about Zenit was said here:D
In reality, the line between ethics, humanity, fairness, and other synonymous concepts in such situations is very blurred and intertwined. There can't be any 100% truth about this, as each person has their own understanding, views, and principles, and ultimately, their mood at the time of such situations.
That's why distinctions are created for such cases, so as not to lump everything together. A friendly match is a friendly match (where a match with 7 substitutions, where both auto-play and everything else is normal).
Let's take Tournaments. What is a tournament? It's a competition, and in any competition, the result is the most important thing. In any competition, it is necessary to determine a winner **WITHIN THE RULES OF THE TOURNAMENT.** Any victory within these rules should be considered fair. No one is to blame for mistakes, misclicks, and other cases, except for the player themselves. Why blame the opponent for your own mistakes, for the randomness, for morality, for giving up the generator? Everyone who registers for a tournament understands that many matches can end one-sided, but the opponent is not to blame for this. And a game reset should be given if it is provided for in the tournament rules.
You need to not only be able to play, but also to lose if the winner has not violated the rules of the game.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...
Hmm, esteemed sir, a player in a LAN game is usually much closer than 2 meters away from you. Please stop being obtuse.
Whether it's 2 meters or 10, the point isn't that. Someone wrote "on LAN" - I explained what the person meant, and you're starting to act smart. Should we ban you again for a year?
2 meters or 10 – it doesn't really matter. Someone wrote "on LAN" – I explained what the person meant, and you start acting smart. Maybe you need to be banned again for a year?
I can't respond to provocations as I'd like, and I can't just say what I think. The points system won't allow it. But I think if I repeat that being rude is a perfectly acceptable substitute for a LAN party online, I won't get points deducted for it. I hope so.
and they just spammed :eek: I don't even feel like reading all this... here, Pit will come and restore order:smile10: If it were up to me, I would have already deleted everything:smile18:
I remember a game of Vic vs. Dubrovin on Jebus Cross: Vic had a decent setup, but overestimating his capabilities, he threw the game down to zero around turn 112 or 113 (I watched the stream) — gritting his teeth, Yura keeps playing; when asked what the point is, he gives a roundabout answer about where we could go. On turn 114, Dubrovin writes that he surrenders: he also threw the game, but his nerves turned out to be weaker.
No... it's not about nerves... it's about assessing the prospects... Yura had a Hydra for the next turn, which he would use to take the Hive... while I, having thrown the game, saw no prospects without an Army.
30.11.2012 Maretti (red, tower, aine, drakon) def Medium (blue, stronghold, hack) 146 on mini nostalgica
Got 110 gremlins from a box so early week 2 I had 290 and exp earth, so I could take out a full con. Got boots and stabels and went for the block with 9angels and full army. 131 I could take his town and prevent him from getting his production. Now the game got really long, we both emptied alot of t-areas. In the end I was very tired and just wanted to end the game, so I showed him what I had (angelic alliance, golden bow, red orb and the health combo, 10 aas, 71 monarcs, 7 behemoths (wanted to upgrade them but built cyclops instead by mistake) and full tower army) and he gave up. Thanks for playing.
Wlk777
