Piterius
Auto-translated
I also don't understand how you can put a casual game on the same level as a tournament. You play a casual game just to have fun, that's why you have auto-saves and can restart the game 100 times. But in a tournament – I'm sorry, you need to use your restarts thoughtfully. If you didn't find the chocolate, confirm the loss.
Someone says that "claiming a win on turn 111 isn't heroic." But in my opinion, begging for a Priest or an auto-win is not heroic either. If the opponent offers it himself, then take it, but if he doesn't, then confirm the loss. Although, personally, I wouldn't feel comfortable knowing that I formally lost, and then playing for a win and, in case of victory, submitting a report. And since I can't allow myself to do that, the opponent shouldn't either. In my opinion, ethics are different for everyone.
The reasoning is correct in relation to chocolate/no chocolate, but the conclusions are in relation to block/no block. That's how it is.
Ethics cannot be different for everyone; each situation has details and nuances that shape the final decision. According to the rules, it's one thing, according to ethics, it's another. If they ask for an auto-win in a situation where the probability of it happening is the same as yours, and you don't give it, then what kind of ethics are we talking about? Hooray! Thank God it wasn't me who got unlucky!
And if you give it, then why worry that they won't give it to you or that they'll post a victory?
Хаос - это порядок, которым сложнее управлять.
icq: 407907277
skype: piterius_i
icq: 407907277
skype: piterius_i