Photos (of UFOs) — Ufology and anomalies.

Lux in tenebris

18 years ago

Auto-translated

Let's post all UFO photos in this thread.

I found one on my disks.

Added after 13 hours 25 minutes
Photos taken by me.

1)
Here's a photo taken with a simple camera. 1996.

Energy pillars are clearly visible. Their structure is visible.

These photos were taken with a (Kodak-7.1 mp)
I cropped out the people and the photo.
2)

Unclear glows are visible near the person. Energetic.
They were not visible to the naked eye.

3)
And this one speaks for itself))
Not visible to the naked eye.

The photo was taken at the same time, 10 minutes after the previous one.

Lux in tenebris

18 years ago

Auto-translated

Took this photo about 30 minutes ago. Beautiful sunset, but... see the black spot. There were no birds or insects.

Zoomed in.

Yes, it wasn't visible to the naked eye.

In reply to Lux in tenebris

Нэйко

17 years ago

Auto-translated

I was very interested in this topic, so I decided to post a photo of a UFO that I took myself:D:

P.S.: This is not from the internet, I took this photo myself:D.

Lux in tenebris

17 years ago

Auto-translated

I never insert anything, although you can do anything in Photoshop. This snapshot was taken yesterday. (Night sky = nothing was visible during the shooting).

For those who think it's Photoshop or that something has been altered in it = go to another section... Humor.

Майор Вихрь

17 years ago

Auto-translated

It’s interesting to consider how one might explain this phenomenon…

In reply to Lux in tenebris

Amko

16 years ago

Auto-translated

Майор Вихрь

Interesting, how could one explain this phenomenon?

It's a spot on the camera lens, obviously.

Небо

16 years ago

Auto-translated

It doesn't look like a stain to me.

Arandor

16 years ago

Auto-translated

This is a black hole! We are all doomed!!111

Amko

16 years ago

Auto-translated

1)

2)

Actually, you are right, there is definitely a resemblance.

In reply to Amko

Dyrman

14 years ago

Auto-translated

I think that's exactly how it was.

And this is probably a rocket breaking the sound barrier, but mistaken for a UFO. Beautiful.

Although, for some reason, it also reminds me of this:

Any UFO, once identified, is no longer a UFO. I think everything can always be explained. But everyone has their own versions ;)

Ment

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Lux, what isn't visible to the naked eye can be absolutely any light phenomenon related to the operation of the camera; this is obvious. Even now, the sensitivity of a user's camera cannot be compared to the sensitivity of a normal eye, which means the camera cannot see "hidden objects." But it can see dirt on the lens, all sorts of diffractions/interferences in all their manifestations (especially if the camera is film-based, which was common in 1996), and reflections from flashes. If it were seen with the eye, then one could think about what it is – whether it's a UFO, atmospheric phenomena, or some kind of ball lightning. But as it is...

In reply to Ment

Dyrman

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Ment

Lux, what cannot be seen with the naked eye can be absolutely any light phenomenon related to the operation of a camera; this is obvious. Even now, the sensitivity of a user's camera cannot be compared to the sensitivity of a normal eye, which means the camera cannot see "hidden objects." But it can see dirt on the lens, all sorts of diffractions/interferences in all their manifestations (especially if the camera is film-based, which should be particularly noticeable, and in 1996 there weren't many other types). It can also see reflections from flashes. But if you saw it with your own eyes, then you could start thinking about what it is: either a UFO, or atmospheric phenomena, or some kind of ball lightning. But as it is...

Where is the photo of the UFO? :mad: ;)

UFO?