Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

Ancient evil

No. They've already addressed this in the games, so why shouldn't a specific race have its own culture?

You dismissed the game by saying it has five missions, and I told you that you were wrong. Moreover, I provided arguments based on facts, not empty words, as you did.

Where's the butthurt? Did I say that everything is garbage, and Battlecry is forever? I provided arguments as to why I think Battlecry is better than parts 2-4 of Warlords.

I reread my post, "game journalist review" is used exactly once.

If I have butthurt, everyone will notice. If I throw garbage, you'll be cleaning up for a week.

And if I have an unargued response, then you don't say anything except the words "garbage" and "butthurt."

Here, our views on this issue differ. Yes, I believe that the maximum is part of Nighon's monster army, and not what is presented in Battlecraze.

And in Warcraft, they are just humanoid cows.

Drug addict. Correct me, add that there are not a hundred or two hundred classes there.

And in Warcraft, they are just humanoid cows.

And I argued in my post quite fully why I don't like this nonsense, called Battlecraze. Didn't you read it? Then why are you attributing something imaginary to me?

There, you build a base, build units, kill everyone. This is the basis of all strategies.
the ability to level up a hero.
a million races, two-dimensional, so I can't distinguish them with my nearsightedness, with different stats.
Many elves, humans, a race of minotaurs, which cause me bat-hurt.

Completely soulless, vile creation, parasitizing on the original "Warlords", which had enough mythical creatures, but there was no such mass-produced crap.

Read it again; not just once.

Without proof, you're just a piece of shit.

Wow! Are you threatening me! And will you suggest fighting one on one with knives?

And post #40080 turns out to belong to me. Very interesting.

I'm simply stating a fact; threatening isn't my style. If necessary, I'll strike directly, so why threaten? You're talking about a fight? Won't you be scared? Can you even throw a punch, or will you just be afraid?

Loki spoke of this sarcastically, hinting at a rather popular, but not the most intellectually sophisticated technique in online discussions.

You learned the phrase, good job, 5.

Did you provide arguments? Well, well.
And your conclusion after that.

seems to cause a strong reaction, as I see.

I reread it, one. I can quote you.

And where is the unargued response in my post? Am I saying, "people are different, and you're an American"? I argue why people are different, why this is the case. But you resort to personal attacks and extremes.

I provided arguments, compared it to "all strategy games," then, going through the gameplay, I criticized the content. All of this is written in post #40066, without fanaticism or excessive harshness, except for the last paragraph, which follows the explanation and serves as a summary.

you immediately start accusing me of a hundred different things

Then the question arises, how good are you with arithmetic now.

And post #40080 actually belongs to me. Very interesting.

If you're interested, some people don't read any magazines or websites at all, and if they criticize something, it's based on a certain personal experience, but you, hoping to hit the mark by chance, are accusing me of things you have no data on.

I am criticizing

I have been responding to you in the same way all this time, as you attack me.

We even argued with friends about which game has more randomness: Warlords 4 or Vesnot.

Of course, in Warlords.

The reasoning is not obvious, and I explained why.

And I confirm my words with facts. More precisely, the discrepancy between your words and the actual things in the game.

Quote my post and highlight the mentions of game journalists in bold.

See the previous point. For distinction, highlight with an underline.

He was shouting that WBC is garbage without using any real gameplay data.

This is not criticism, but the screams of a market hag.

You ignore half of each of my posts; I answer everything.

You took the words out of context; such argumentation is pathetic.

No, not accurate.

Stop twisting the facts.

>> Firstly, the speaker is unfamiliar with the subject, except for reviews from offended game journalists who weren't paid
> you are talking shit about a game you aren't even properly familiar with; most likely you saw screenshots and perhaps read a couple of reviews
Two. And to the third, I added Wikipedia > Another source that allows one not to form their own opinion, but to use a ready-made one and not strain themselves, as here too you accuse me of not playing, but reading and listening to something.

What?

you don't say anything at all besides the words shit and butthurt

I provided arguments, gave a comparison with "all strategies," then, going through the gameplay part, criticized the content. All this is written in post #40066, without fanaticism or excessive harshness.

excuses for the game are not solid arguments, but the screams of a fanboy jerking off to fantasy and races

You take some phrases out of context and ignore others

Obviously, I am omitting the thickest-greenest demagogic points

Quote the entire post and highlight the "bullshit" and "rage." The post has many words, but "rage" is used once, and "bullshit" is used twice. Or just explain what you liked so much about my post.

I was talking about reviews, not about game journalists, but about all sorts of "reviewers" that have proliferated on the internet.

Firstly, regarding the lack of solid arguments, provide a specific example. Is the list of Minotaur units not an argument in the question of their army composition? What, in your opinion, is a solid argument?

Thirdly, what does "fap to races" mean? I don't understand something in this life, probably, but I don't know the meaning of this phrase. I can understand "fap to an elf/dwarf girl," etc., but how can you "fap to races"? Think about the words "elf-dwarf-orc-human-races" and twitch? Ugh.

Ha-ha. In my opinion, you are deliberately focusing on the most sensitive points. Ignoring what I write about various strategies, campaigns, etc., you get upset about the phrase with the word "rage" and the assumption that you haven't played the game, or haven't played it much.