Sacred Haven of Debauchery

The reasoning is not obvious, and I explained why.

You took the words out of context; such an argument is pathetic.

And I confirm my words with facts. More precisely, the discrepancy between your words and the actual things in the game.

No, it's not accurate. Stop manipulating the facts.

Quote my post and highlight the mentions of game journalists in bold.

> First, the speaker is not familiar with the subject, except for reviews from disgruntled game journalists who weren't paid enough
> You are badmouthing a game that you are not really familiar with; you probably saw screenshots and maybe read a couple of reviews
Two. And I added Wikipedia to the third > Another source that allows you not to form your own opinion, but to use a ready-made one and not strain yourself, because here too you accuse me of not playing, but of reading and listening to something.

See the previous point. For distinction, highlight with an underline.

What?

He was shouting that WBC is garbage without using any real gameplay data.

I argued, provided a comparison with "all strategies," and then, going through the gameplay, criticized the content. All of this is written in post #40066, without fanaticism and excessive harshness.

This is not criticism, but the screams of a market hag.

Your justifications for the game are not solid arguments, but the screams of a fanboy, drooling over fantasy and races.

You ignore half of each of my posts; I answer everything.

You take phrases out of context, ignore others, try to accuse me of something, resort to personal attacks, and engage in blatant trolling. It is obvious that I am omitting the most thick-headed, green, and demagogic moments, and you could simply behave more decently.