Sacred Haven of Debauchery

Auto-translated

I provided arguments, compared it to "all strategy games," then, going through the gameplay, I criticized the content. All of this is written in post #40066, without fanaticism or excessive harshness, except for the last paragraph, which follows the explanation and serves as a summary.

The argumentation is not obvious, and I explained why.

you immediately start accusing me of a hundred different things

And I confirm my words with facts. More precisely, the discrepancy between your words and the real things in the game.

Then the question arises, how good are you with arithmetic now.

Quote my post and highlight the mentions of in-game levels with a bold tag.

And post #40080 actually belongs to me. Very interesting.

See the previous point. To distinguish, highlight with an underline.

If you're interested, some people don't read any magazines or websites at all, and if they criticize something, it's based on a certain personal experience, but you, hoping to hit the mark by chance, are accusing me of things you have no data on.

I made an assumption based on the fact that you were shouting that WBC is garbage without providing any real in-game data, except that there are minotaurs, dwarves, and elves in the game. After that, I made a "summary."

I am criticizing

This is not criticism, but the shouting of a market hag.

I have been responding to you in the same way all this time, as you attack me.

You ignore half of each of my posts, and I respond to everything.

Reading content in

Interface language