Sacred Haven of Debauchery

You learned the phrase, good job, 5.

But you didn't understand its meaning initially, and I want to convey it; it's not difficult for me to repeat it.

Did you provide arguments? Well, well.
And your conclusion after that.

I provided arguments, compared it to "all strategies," and then, going through the gameplay, criticized the content. All of this is written in post #40066, without fanaticism or excessive harshness, except for the last paragraph, which follows the explanation as a summary. You have the right not to agree with my opinion, and it

seems to cause a strong reaction, as I see.

, so strong that you immediately start accusing me of a hundred different things, of "not playing," of "believing game journalists and Wikipedia," and engaging in blatant trolling. If we ignore the last two useless posts by Vissy, what was written in #40078 is perhaps the most relevant to the conversation, without a "counterattack on the critic," without any unnecessary drama, and without any attempts to attack personally. But I have nothing to respond with, as my main points mentioned above were directed at other aspects of the game.

I reread it, one. I can quote you.

Then the question arises, how good are you with arithmetic now.

And where is the unargued response in my post? Am I saying, "people are different, and you're an American"? I argue why people are different, why this is the case. But you resort to personal attacks and extremes.

Are you a Warlords fanboy or just another person spreading negativity?
I responded to you in the same way about your game journalists. If you're interested, some people don't read any magazines or websites at all, and if they criticize something, they have a certain personal experience, but you, hoping to hit the mark, accuse me of something you have no data on. And it doesn't matter that I played the first game at the time of its release and still own the disc, and I played the third game five years ago, three years ago, and two years ago, trying to finally get a feel for it; you just want to accuse me of something because I'm criticizing a beloved game.
you only say "crap" and "rage"
And post #40080 actually belongs to me. Very interesting.

In general, I've been responding to you in the same way all this time, as you attack me. I'm not going to write new essays, of course, because everything is described in my first post and slightly supplemented in a couple of subsequent ones; the rest is your demagoguery, which I can only respond to in the same way, lol.