Posts from Forum

Using the word "please" in any request is a sign of politeness.

More like formality. I recently learned that in English, "pray" is sometimes used in this role (1) to pray, 2) to plead, ask, beg, urge).

What's up with the rating? Something seems to be broken. (
NaN - NaN appears in the latest calculations when I check the rating for a specific player.

I need some advice. This concerns people who are knowledgeable. I was involved in a traffic accident at a pedestrian crossing (unregulated), and I broke my leg (3 fractures). According to the medical examination, it was classified as serious bodily harm. Article 264.2. The driver wants to settle out of court and is offering money (a small amount, 100k). He also has car insurance, and I have the documents to file a claim for compensation. The question is, what is the best course of action: wait for the court decision, or file a lawsuit for the damages caused to me? I have property losses of 100k, just from the accident. Thank you in advance.

Help me with some advice. This concerns people who are knowledgeable. I was in a traffic accident at a pedestrian crossing (unregulated), I broke my leg (3 fractures), and they assigned a serious injury according to the medical examination. Article 264.2. The driver wants to make peace and offers money (a small amount, 100k). He also has car insurance, and I have the documents to file a claim there. The question is, what is better to do: wait for the court, or file a claim for damages? I have 100k in property losses just from when he hit me. Thank you in advance.

In a settlement – ask him for as much money as you find acceptable (I would ask for at least 300k, or even half a million). In court – ask for the maximum: medical expenses plus rehabilitation expenses plus compensation for loss of ability to work plus compensation for moral damages. As I understand it, the driver was drunk (or left the scene of the accident)? It's a serious article – up to seven years in prison, and if he doesn't come to an agreement with you, he may very well end up in jail.

The driver wants a truce and offers money (a paltry 100k). He also has car insurance, and I have the documents to file a claim. The question is, what is better to do: wait for the court, or file a claim for the damage caused to me? I have 100k in property damage from when he hit me. Thank you in advance.

You can file a claim now. Then the judge will consider the claim together with the case. You can find more details, for example, here: http://www.prokuror-rostov.ru/law_explanation/152250/101954/
If you need the money urgently, you can refer to Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation – this is a case of public prosecution, so reconciliation with the victim is not grounds for termination. If the driver committed the crime for the first time, then, of course, they may terminate the case under Article 76 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, but only the investigator/judge decides. In any case, you should now communicate more closely with your investigator: your interests in the case coincide.

In terms of an out-of-court settlement, ask him for as much money as you deem appropriate (I would ask for at least 300k, or even half a million). If it goes to court, demand the maximum: medical expenses plus rehabilitation costs plus compensation for loss of earning capacity plus compensation for emotional distress. As I understand it, the driver was drunk (or left the scene of the accident)? It's a serious offense – up to seven years in prison, and if he doesn't reach an agreement with you, he could very well end up in jail.

His DPS officers let him go after the collision because he had a ticket for a business trip and was in a hurry. I was shocked when I found out. As the investigator says, he could face up to 3 years in prison if there's no settlement; if there is a settlement, he might get off lightly, perhaps with just a ban from driving in the region and Moscow. He's pretending to be broke and even claimed that he sold the car he used to hit you. Therefore, he should pay.

His DPS officers let him go after the incident because he had a travel ticket and was in a hurry. I was shocked when I found out. As the investigator says, he could face up to 3 years in prison if there's no plea bargain; otherwise, it might be a lighter sentence, up to being allowed to leave the region and Moscow. He's pretending to be homeless and even claimed he sold the car he used in the hit-and-run. So, he should have money.

Source: Consultant-Plus (current legal database).
Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
"Violation of traffic rules or vehicle operation rules by a person driving a car, tram, or other motorized vehicle, resulting in negligent infliction of grievous bodily harm."
"2. The act stipulated in Part 1 of this Article, resulting in negligent infliction of grievous bodily harm, if it:
a) was committed by a person in a state of intoxication;
b) was accompanied by leaving the scene of the incident, -
shall be punishable by compulsory labor for a term of up to five years with deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years, or imprisonment for a term of three to seven years with deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years."
So, based on your description, the DPS officers let a drunk driver go from the scene of the accident? Or is it the first point of the article, not the second, as previously stated???
If the documents state Article 264.2 (point two), then either the driver was drunk, or the driver left the scene of the accident. And in that case, the DPS officers who let the perpetrator go should also be held accountable, through the Internal Security Service.

His accomplices let him go after the hit-and-run because he had a travel ticket and was in a hurry. I was shocked when I found out. The investigator said he could face up to 3 years in prison if there's no plea bargain, but if there is, it could be reduced to a lighter sentence, possibly just a ban from the region and Moscow. He's pretending to be homeless and even claimed he sold the car he used in the hit-and-run. So, he should have money.

Write to me on ICQ, and I'll give you the contact information of a lawyer who can advise you on what to do.

Thank you to everyone who responded! The issue has been resolved.

Dota record holder: she is 39 years old and has played over 20,000 matches. She calls the game her home and compares a ban to death.

https://youtu.be/MW9YJm-lntA I'm watching Shaposhnikov and it came to mind, alas the fools first voted for Poroshenko, now Zelensky; better not to vote if you cannot provide arguments, decline followed after Yushchenko.

About Poroshenko https://youtu.be/E3rI3AiIKt0 (being discussed in flood in discord)

Apparently, this needs to be brought to public attention, because the "order keepers" and "those who consider themselves very important" just won't calm down.

My opponent tvarina OFB (diamond) and I were playing; we restarted, got a game going. My draw was, of course, not very good: no objects, no imbalanced artifacts. He immediately reveals an external dwelling of Minotaurs. I built birds and ran to find a path to him, because there was nothing else to go for. I didn't reach the opponent's castle; I saw his army of 20-49 ducks on turn 123.
I wrote to him that he is a luck-sack. (And that's the truth, because the previous 2 games on 6lm he won by the same lucky scenario, or is Galtran and a Dimension Door scroll on 6lm not luck?).
He got offended by this and saved the game, saying he doesn't intend to continue.

The judges awarded him a loss anyway, because that's no reason to refuse a game. Of course, I didn't ask him for the password; fortunately, the stream on Twitch was saved.

So in the end, what offended him? The bitter truth?
- 111 easy Minotaur external dwelling
- 111 necromancer Isra, to mass a free army for Dragon Fly Hives/conscripts
- 4 easy Dragon Fly Hives behind degenerative guard-stompers (like Hovels and Nomads).
- Spirit of Sorrow, to take guards and hives in the easiest possible way
- Book of Earth 2 days from the castle behind unupgraded Pits (on Dungeon ground, to really humiliate them with the first speed of Minotaurs and ducks)

So, is this like an average deal? And what got to him was precisely that he got a godly draw and he knew it, BUT some no-name positive guy dared to tell him he was a luck-sack (though in this game it really was the case, because I have no idea how I could have won this map, since I had 5 birds and that's it; there was a Book of Fire behind 20-49 Manticores, but that wasn't the solution).

Unlike him, I didn't curse him out with profanity (hello YAR, who can't distinguish choice swear words from the word "luck-sack"), as he likes to do on his streams; I just stated a fact: Pure luck-sackery.
"I'll leave the link to tvarina's stream below, where you can listen to how you should curse out your opponent, because you can't say anything back, since you're the one streaming and you're the only one talking."

I'm really tired of these double standards. The "intellectual" got offended by the word "luck-sack" and then went on such a tirade that it makes your ears bleed.

And having listened to what he was saying about me on stream and how he was name-calling, oh guys, and this is a top streamer? Well yes, nowadays it's trendy to sling mud at everyone and be an a**hole, advertise sports betting sites (blatant scamming), and the people eat it up.

It was precisely inflated ego that made my opponent rage. Too famous and respected in your circles. Lots of subscribers, fame. No one dares say a word.

At this level, everyone knows how to play such setups; yes, someone might play them out 1-3 days faster, but the result will be the same — a win.
This is luck-sackery, not a setup. I said it like it is.

I understand that everyone here lives by the principle: "That's how it's done, and we'll defend the TOP." Daddies stick up for daddies, but I don't care. I'm ready to defend my point of view alone, because this is some kind of disgrace on the opponent's part; a teacher has appeared.

Therefore, I cannot just let this go; let your community know everything, and everyone can draw their own conclusions.

And I am attaching the screenshot of the correspondence itself:


p.s.: link to the stream, where I learned a lot of new things about myself:)

p.p.s. Did someone want to beat my f'ing face in there? Are you serious? No, come on, call me, we'll meet up if there's time, and you can tell me in person why you had that desire (you can tell me here, I'm curious). And try to do it; it's quite possible, I'm an ordinary person. But if need be, I can stand up for myself.

Well, congratulations, a new way to win has been found. If you can't win fairly, start being rude and provoking your opponent. They'll either leave the game or get drawn into a reciprocal exchange of insults, and you'll win. Great. Apparently, you don't just have to not be ashamed of this, but even be proud of it.

So, is this like an average outcome? And what bothered him was that he got lucky, and he understood that, BUT some random positive person dared to write to him that he was just lucky (although in this game, that's exactly the case, because I don't know how I could have won this map, as I only had 5 birds and that's it, plus a fire book from the manticores 20-49, but it wasn't decisive).

Are you sure you're playing Heroes? :smile07:

Mьse Positive, to be honest, you have repeatedly expressed your thoughts rather undelicately, to put it mildly; I often notice this on the forum. Perhaps, for you, communicating with both familiar and unfamiliar people in such a tone is normal. Well, that's your right. But from the point of view of society, this is not entirely normal. I'm not here to advise you on how to behave, but since you decided to make the situation public, in which you are definitely not entirely right (from the point of view of the public), then please listen to the corresponding opinion. I believe that everyone who is familiar with the situation will say roughly the same thing to you. -- I will add my opinion regarding the decision. According to the letter of the game rules, the decision is correct; it was twaryna who refused to play. But this is rather a reason to consider expanding the rules to cover this case. Now it's just one phrase, but sometimes people, when intoxicated, can allow themselves to swear heartily. Or even during a turn, or as spam during the opponent's turn. What should be done in such a case? Should the game continue?