positive
Auto-translated
Apparently, this needs to be brought to public attention, because the "order keepers" and "those who consider themselves very important" just won't calm down.
My opponent tvarina OFB (diamond) and I were playing; we restarted, got a game going. My draw was, of course, not very good: no objects, no imbalanced artifacts. He immediately reveals an external dwelling of Minotaurs. I built birds and ran to find a path to him, because there was nothing else to go for. I didn't reach the opponent's castle; I saw his army of 20-49 ducks on turn 123.
I wrote to him that he is a luck-sack. (And that's the truth, because the previous 2 games on 6lm he won by the same lucky scenario, or is Galtran and a Dimension Door scroll on 6lm not luck?).
He got offended by this and saved the game, saying he doesn't intend to continue.
The judges awarded him a loss anyway, because that's no reason to refuse a game. Of course, I didn't ask him for the password; fortunately, the stream on Twitch was saved.
So in the end, what offended him? The bitter truth?
- 111 easy Minotaur external dwelling
- 111 necromancer Isra, to mass a free army for Dragon Fly Hives/conscripts
- 4 easy Dragon Fly Hives behind degenerative guard-stompers (like Hovels and Nomads).
- Spirit of Sorrow, to take guards and hives in the easiest possible way
- Book of Earth 2 days from the castle behind unupgraded Pits (on Dungeon ground, to really humiliate them with the first speed of Minotaurs and ducks)
So, is this like an average deal? And what got to him was precisely that he got a godly draw and he knew it, BUT some no-name positive guy dared to tell him he was a luck-sack (though in this game it really was the case, because I have no idea how I could have won this map, since I had 5 birds and that's it; there was a Book of Fire behind 20-49 Manticores, but that wasn't the solution).
Unlike him, I didn't curse him out with profanity (hello YAR, who can't distinguish choice swear words from the word "luck-sack"), as he likes to do on his streams; I just stated a fact: Pure luck-sackery.
"I'll leave the link to tvarina's stream below, where you can listen to how you should curse out your opponent, because you can't say anything back, since you're the one streaming and you're the only one talking."
I'm really tired of these double standards. The "intellectual" got offended by the word "luck-sack" and then went on such a tirade that it makes your ears bleed.
And having listened to what he was saying about me on stream and how he was name-calling, oh guys, and this is a top streamer? Well yes, nowadays it's trendy to sling mud at everyone and be an a**hole, advertise sports betting sites (blatant scamming), and the people eat it up.
It was precisely inflated ego that made my opponent rage. Too famous and respected in your circles. Lots of subscribers, fame. No one dares say a word.
At this level, everyone knows how to play such setups; yes, someone might play them out 1-3 days faster, but the result will be the same — a win.
This is luck-sackery, not a setup. I said it like it is.
I understand that everyone here lives by the principle: "That's how it's done, and we'll defend the TOP." Daddies stick up for daddies, but I don't care. I'm ready to defend my point of view alone, because this is some kind of disgrace on the opponent's part; a teacher has appeared.
Therefore, I cannot just let this go; let your community know everything, and everyone can draw their own conclusions.
And I am attaching the screenshot of the correspondence itself:
p.s.: link to the stream, where I learned a lot of new things about myself:)
p.p.s. Did someone want to beat my f'ing face in there? Are you serious? No, come on, call me, we'll meet up if there's time, and you can tell me in person why you had that desire (you can tell me here, I'm curious). And try to do it; it's quite possible, I'm an ordinary person. But if need be, I can stand up for myself.
My opponent tvarina OFB (diamond) and I were playing; we restarted, got a game going. My draw was, of course, not very good: no objects, no imbalanced artifacts. He immediately reveals an external dwelling of Minotaurs. I built birds and ran to find a path to him, because there was nothing else to go for. I didn't reach the opponent's castle; I saw his army of 20-49 ducks on turn 123.
I wrote to him that he is a luck-sack. (And that's the truth, because the previous 2 games on 6lm he won by the same lucky scenario, or is Galtran and a Dimension Door scroll on 6lm not luck?).
He got offended by this and saved the game, saying he doesn't intend to continue.
The judges awarded him a loss anyway, because that's no reason to refuse a game. Of course, I didn't ask him for the password; fortunately, the stream on Twitch was saved.
So in the end, what offended him? The bitter truth?
- 111 easy Minotaur external dwelling
- 111 necromancer Isra, to mass a free army for Dragon Fly Hives/conscripts
- 4 easy Dragon Fly Hives behind degenerative guard-stompers (like Hovels and Nomads).
- Spirit of Sorrow, to take guards and hives in the easiest possible way
- Book of Earth 2 days from the castle behind unupgraded Pits (on Dungeon ground, to really humiliate them with the first speed of Minotaurs and ducks)
So, is this like an average deal? And what got to him was precisely that he got a godly draw and he knew it, BUT some no-name positive guy dared to tell him he was a luck-sack (though in this game it really was the case, because I have no idea how I could have won this map, since I had 5 birds and that's it; there was a Book of Fire behind 20-49 Manticores, but that wasn't the solution).
Unlike him, I didn't curse him out with profanity (hello YAR, who can't distinguish choice swear words from the word "luck-sack"), as he likes to do on his streams; I just stated a fact: Pure luck-sackery.
"I'll leave the link to tvarina's stream below, where you can listen to how you should curse out your opponent, because you can't say anything back, since you're the one streaming and you're the only one talking."
I'm really tired of these double standards. The "intellectual" got offended by the word "luck-sack" and then went on such a tirade that it makes your ears bleed.
And having listened to what he was saying about me on stream and how he was name-calling, oh guys, and this is a top streamer? Well yes, nowadays it's trendy to sling mud at everyone and be an a**hole, advertise sports betting sites (blatant scamming), and the people eat it up.
It was precisely inflated ego that made my opponent rage. Too famous and respected in your circles. Lots of subscribers, fame. No one dares say a word.
At this level, everyone knows how to play such setups; yes, someone might play them out 1-3 days faster, but the result will be the same — a win.
This is luck-sackery, not a setup. I said it like it is.
I understand that everyone here lives by the principle: "That's how it's done, and we'll defend the TOP." Daddies stick up for daddies, but I don't care. I'm ready to defend my point of view alone, because this is some kind of disgrace on the opponent's part; a teacher has appeared.
Therefore, I cannot just let this go; let your community know everything, and everyone can draw their own conclusions.
And I am attaching the screenshot of the correspondence itself:
p.s.: link to the stream, where I learned a lot of new things about myself:)
p.p.s. Did someone want to beat my f'ing face in there? Are you serious? No, come on, call me, we'll meet up if there's time, and you can tell me in person why you had that desire (you can tell me here, I'm curious). And try to do it; it's quite possible, I'm an ordinary person. But if need be, I can stand up for myself.
ICQ 31-34-85-264