Auto-translated
By the way, are there any willing participants to continue the Cobra's tradition and organize a prediction tournament?
Posts from Round table
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
I'm thinking about it, but since I'm doing some renovations right now, I'm not sure if I can free up 3k or not. It's not a huge amount of money, but when you put it here and there, it can add up. So, if there are people who want to contribute some money to the prize pool or just have some fun, I could organize it. Again, it's possible that I can find those 3k, but it will be a bit later, at the end of July. For now, I can put it this way: a predictor tournament with a possible prize pool of 3000 rubles. If you find this uninteresting/unnecessary, then either organize it yourself or we can just watch the World Cup.
Auto-translated
The anarchy template consists of many sub-templates, most of which I am not interested in at all, unlike the very idea of anarchy. Has no one else had the desire to divide them into at least 2 pools? Or, for example, to separate the templates with 2 native villages on the starting map into a separate pool – that would be ideal.
Auto-translated
Has anyone else had the desire to split them into at least 2 pools? Or, for example, create a separate pool for templates with 2 native villages on the respawn point – that would be ideal.
Auto-translated
So, what's the problem? I'm afraid that even fewer people will want to play on your personal network with pre-defined templates than in a regular anarchy mode.
But does anyone actually play a random game with 12 templates, from Panic to Jebus? They choose a specific one, or at least make some adjustments. But here, it's just a random mess that's completely unplayable for me. I don't want to play Panic – I need tons of joining Archons and Liches with Power of Knowledge.
Auto-translated
you need tons of Archmages and Liches with Power of Knowledge skill
positive
Auto-translated
Why not play 6LM without any rules, or even better, Jebus with Dungeon?
Auto-translated
Well, then let's play 6LM without rules, or even better, Jebus with Dungeon! :)
Jebus with Dungeon definitely sounds good, thanks for the idea!
Ihromant
Auto-translated
I have a question that isn't related to the HD mod, but I don't know where else to ask it.
When Necromancers are playing and casting spells like "Shakti" – the damage range is displayed as 1x-3x (e.g., 250-750). I've had a feeling for a long time (and I think others agree) that the minimum value (and values below the minimum) rarely occur. This makes calculating the effectiveness of many Necromancer builds quite simple – we calculate the average and assume that it will likely occur. I believe this is a bug and should be fixed. The distribution should be uniform. The value of 250 should occur with the same probability as 750 (and all other damage values).
The positive side is that Necromancers, "Shakti," and the Conflux would become less overpowered for almost no cost (since they would be affected the most).
My question is, how difficult would it be to fix this?
Auto-translated
To start, the question should be phrased like this: does this even exist, or is it a personal glitch?
nik312
Auto-translated
All creatures in the stack deal damage independently. Normal distribution – google it. :/
This is the only way it can be in a decent game.
This is the only way it can be in a decent game.
Ihromant
Auto-translated
The initial question should be framed like this: does it even exist, or is it a personal glitch?
All creatures in the stack deal damage independently. Normal distribution – google it. :/
This is the only way it can be in a decent game.
Ihromant
Auto-translated
I'm reposting the question here, as suggested by Dirty_Player.
I have a question that isn't related to the HD mod, but I don't know where else to ask it.
When Necromancers are playing and casting spells like "Shakti" – the damage range is displayed as 1x-3x (e.g., 250-750). I've had a feeling for a long time (and I think others agree) that the minimum value (and values below the minimum) are very rare. This makes calculating the damage output of many Necromancers quite simple – we calculate the average and assume that it will likely occur. I believe this is a bug and should be fixed. The distribution should be uniform. The value of 250 should occur with the same probability as 750 (and all other damage values).
The positive aspect – Necromancers, "Shakti," and the "Conflux" will become less overpowered for almost no cost (since they will be affected the most).
What do you think about this change?
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
I have a question that is not related to the HD mod, but I don't know where to ask it.
When a large number of units attack and don't get blocked – for example, 1000 Shaktis – the damage range is displayed as 1x-3x (e.g., 250-750).
Added 10 minutes later
For example, 10 skeletons attack with almost random damage, while 1000 units deal damage very close to the arithmetic mean.
Ihromant
Auto-translated
Even with 10 units dealing 1-3 damage, the chance of maximum damage will be negligible. But it's still greater than with 1000 units. Undoubtedly.
But it seems like there's just a lack of careful planning instead of thoughtful consideration of the battle plan. Plus, I also noticed that (probably due to rounding) the average is slightly higher than the arithmetic mean. I understand that no one will probably want to change such a fundamental thing, but a checkbox in HW_rules would be great.
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb