Skip to content

Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

4.3 (23 ratings)
Closed
What shall we name the establishment?
28 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
“Flooding.” Simple and effective
17.9% 5 votes
Leave it as is – “Fludnyak”
7.1% 2 votes
“A den of debauchery.” How original!
39.3% 11 votes
Brewery
17.9% 5 votes
Another option (specify in the subject line)
17.9% 5 votes
In reply to Heroist
User Avatar
#62608
Auto-translated
Heroist
I used to play it, it was okay. It's a shame it got boring quickly; there wasn't enough content or events. Maybe they've added more now, of course.
same
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#62609
Auto-translated
Overall, the cartoon is more entertaining. But there isn't much non-military content, and in this regard, the game falls far short of King's Bounty 2.
User Avatar
#62610
Auto-translated
Of the Ascension branches, the strongest one is the best.
Choose the Ascension branch based on what is "strong" against a weak AI, not based on role-playing or personal preferences.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#62611
Auto-translated
>Taking words out of context
User Avatar
#62612
Auto-translated
and I also see a lot of micromanagement, which isn't exactly a good thing.
When there are more than 5 planets, they'll force you to introduce sectors, and the sectors will be self-governing. True, their self-governance isn't perfect; sometimes you have to temporarily remove individual planets from the sector and do something in them (improve the administration building, for example), but overall, the AI handles it.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#62613
Auto-translated
I hope this game doesn’t have rebellions.
User Avatar
#62614
Auto-translated
When there are >5 planets, they will force you to introduce sectors, and the sectors will be self-governing.
It used to be five, but now it's more like 7-9. It depends on whether you play as a pacifist. It could even be 11 if you take the corresponding perk.
True, their self-governance isn't perfect; sometimes you have to temporarily remove individual planets from the sector and do something in them (improve the administration building, for example), but overall, the AI handles it.
The sector AI has improved after the patch, but it still sometimes does strange things. For example, it builds a regular power plant on a beta-rock.
I hope this game doesn't have rebellions.
It has rebellions. Sometimes, a planet can quietly break away from your control and join another empire if they have similar political views.
User Avatar
#62615
Auto-translated
True, their self-governance isn't perfect.
As far as I remember, before the patches, the "Brukvoed" considered growing "brukva" (a type of turnip) as the most important goal, even though food wasn't yet distributed throughout the entire empire.
I hope this game doesn't have rebellions.
They are much better here than in StarCraft 2. Rebellions here depend on the population's worldview, not on pure randomness. So, if you know that someone doesn't share your ethics, just genocide them.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#62616
Auto-translated
So, if you know that someone doesn't share your ethical views, just commit genocide against them.
In version 1.5, you can't do that. Now, you can't commit genocide against individual pops; you can only commit genocide against an entire species. Moreover, genocide is now only available to xenophobes and the Hivemind, although you can still purge populations even as an authoritarian empire. However, even without genocide, there aren't many problems with discontent, as it's easy to maintain at least a medium level of faction morale.
User Avatar
#62617
Auto-translated
So, this is what I ended up doing. I wanted to draw today, but no, I launched Stellaris again. What a habit.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#62618
Auto-translated
genocide individual attempts
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
User Avatar
#62619
Auto-translated
It won't work like that in 1.5. Now you can't commit genocide against individual species; you can only commit genocide against an entire species.
I gave myself away by admitting that I didn't actually commit genocide against anyone, I just act tough online. But overall, in my opinion, this is a step backward.
Moreover, genocide is now only available to xenophobes and the Hive Mind, although you can still displace species even as an authoritarian empire.
A debatable restriction (like all the others regarding ethics), but not without merit (like all the others).
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
I felt like creating a thread: "Whose ass would you genocide?"
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#62620
Auto-translated
But overall, in my opinion, this is a step backward.
I don't disagree.
A controversial limitation (like all the others regarding ethics).
That's true. Although it still doesn't quite reach the level of egalitarians who are unable to grant equal rights to AI (because it is now unique to materialists).
User Avatar
#62621
Auto-translated
Although it still falls short of egalitarianism, which is incapable of granting equal rights to AI (because this is now unique to materialists).
That's exactly what I was thinking when I wrote that. But it can be explained: if materialism is not the overarching ethics, then the government is tolerant of religions and other beliefs. Thus, the government is essentially saying, "yes, we don't deny that religions can be right." And since religious people believe that the damned synthetics have no soul, it follows that they cannot be granted equal rights. I may have explained it a bit clumsily, but I hope the idea is clear.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#62622
Auto-translated
Since religious people believe that cursed synthetics don't have a soul.
This is also a questionable limitation.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram