Skip to content

Sacred Haven of Debauchery

User Avatar
#62621
Auto-translated
Although it still falls short of egalitarianism, which is incapable of granting equal rights to AI (because this is now unique to materialists).
That's exactly what I was thinking when I wrote that. But it can be explained: if materialism is not the overarching ethics, then the government is tolerant of religions and other beliefs. Thus, the government is essentially saying, "yes, we don't deny that religions can be right." And since religious people believe that the damned synthetics have no soul, it follows that they cannot be granted equal rights. I may have explained it a bit clumsily, but I hope the idea is clear.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?