Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк.. Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов. Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.
Actually, I'm nobody's clone; I registered just to ask a question about the game at this link. There's no need to suspect me of being a clone. My nickname is "Quietly Walking in the Darkness," not some generic clone name. :)
In the 97th episode of the show, the mythbusters tested the myth on a model airplane and on an ultralight aircraft – in both cases, the airplane took off.
Oh, too bad I didn't see that episode. Now I'll read how they explain it. So, is the air really that viscous? Let's take a look. Nebо has a cool picture, but I have an even better one in mind (well, maybe just a little bit better :)). It's on a poster on the highway near Mytishchi; I should take a picture of it. --- Ah, I read it; it's much simpler than I thought ))) The airplane doesn't gain speed by rotating the wheels; it gains speed by rotating the turbines. Sooner or later, the wheels will start rotating faster than the runway, and the airplane will take off. They shouldn't have overlooked such a small but important detail.
Sooner or later, the wheels will start spinning faster than the canvas, and the plane will take off.
The direction and strength of the wind play an important role, but in general, there is a redundancy that, if overcome, will lead to failure. For example, if the conveyor belt moves too quickly, or if there is too much tailwind.
Added 3 minutes later Could you tell me what this means?
Sooner or later, the wheels will start spinning faster than the canvas, and the plane will take off.
But according to the conditions, the canvas is adjustable and adapts to the speed of the wheels, right? Therefore, the wheels will never spin faster, and the plane will not take off. The kids conducted an experiment that didn't follow the conditions.
Well, if that's the case, then yes... But the canvas still has a speed limit, while the wheels can be accelerated as fast as you want, practically without limit, because we're not accelerating the wheels themselves, but the plane. The rotation of the wheels is already a consequence of accelerating the plane, not the cause. You could say that no matter how hard we try to adjust the canvas, we're just increasing the speed of the wheels, and the difference between the speeds of the canvas and the wheels will be approximately constant and depend solely on the power of the plane's turbines.
Can you tell me what this means?
Upload it to the forum, it won't let me. It says that your picture for the third Heroes game has an 18+ rating. It's definitely got naked dendroids in it.
Well, if that's the case, then yes... But the conveyor belt still has a speed limit, while the wheels can be accelerated as fast as you want, practically without limit, because we're not accelerating the wheels, but the plane itself. The rotation of the wheels is already a consequence of the plane's acceleration, not the cause. You could say that no matter how hard we try to adjust the conveyor belt, we're only increasing the speed of the wheels' rotation, and the difference between the speeds of the conveyor belt and the wheels will be approximately constant and depend solely on the power of the plane's turbines.
If the conveyor belt has a speed limit, then the wheels do too, let's say, due to the wear and tear on the wheel surface, or the loosening of the mounting at the base (since the conveyor belt has a limit, it means we're talking about high loads). But no matter how fast the wheels spin, the plane will remain stationary relative to the ground. And the plane needs to develop a certain speed relative to the ground in order to take off.
Regarding the air, if you want to get technical. But the point isn't even about the speed limit; that was just the first thought that came to my mind. The second, as I mentioned, is that trying to accelerate the movement of the canvas won't achieve anything; the wheels will just spin faster. No matter how hard we try, their speeds (the wheels and the canvas) will never be the same because the wheels have a negligible impulse compared to the plane, and the plane accelerates due to the turbines. They will accelerate the plane, and they won't care what happens to the wheels. And the wheels will be forced to spin at the speed dictated by the plane, and if the canvas hinders them, they will simply spin faster.
Nope, relative to the ground. Air cannot be taken as a reference frame. Imagine the wind is blowing. Relative to the airflow, the plane is moving, but not relative to the ground.
The plane accelerates due to the turbines, but it moves relative to the ground, and its speed increases, so its momentum also increases. But on the runway, the plane's speed will be 0, which means its momentum will also be zero.
And in general, your statement, "No matter how hard we try, their speeds (wheels and runway) will never be the same," contradicts the condition. Because we are told that the speeds are equal.
Тихо ходящий в темноте
