Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I understand that he doesn't care at all about any attempts to deal damage, including May, wards, Bahamut, Themis, Khavi, the Necropolis, and so on, and so forth.
Now I know what some of you who just saw that description are thinking: "well, just use Odin," or "just use DoD," or "just use Bahamut," or "just use Themis," and many more. Here's the catch: this thing doesn't give a damn about those things. Why? Simply because of its second ability description, which states, "Can't be affected by any other card's abilities...." Now, where does banish come from? Odin's fanfare. So, it's a card ability! Holy shit, he can't be banished by Odin! Alright, what about a destruction effect? Bahamut? Bahamut is obviously a card, and he has a "destroy effect." The same with Themis, which is basically Bahamut without a body that also doesn't destroy amulets. Alright, there should be another way, right? Oh yeah, what about petrification without a sigil? That will turn him into a golem—oh wait, that's also a card effect. Damn, we can't transform it either!
Simply put, Aegis is a follower that just cannot be taken out from the field, no matter what you try to do.
What? "What about bane?" you said? Well, we had our hope that bane would be able to take care of it, especially with Zeus having a storm and bane. Except...it's been confirmed that bane does not work. You see, we had hopes for bane because the magazine that leaked Heavenly Aegis stated that "bane might work" or "a follower with bane might be viable now," or something along those lines. But, recently, the magazine actually just made a statement asking for an apology after providing misinformation on that part.
I think "can't be damaged" refers to an ability like Albert's under the Enhance spell, but instead of lasting for one turn, it's permanent. If he dies from Mayhem or by hitting wards, then it's simpler, of course.
Well, I think either some garbage card will pop up that "permanently reduces attack to 0," or hello to aggro decks that will crush this guy by the ninth round.
Albert, with an enhanced unit, is defeated by Bane.
I just played against a player using a Roach strategy without early-game units and with a White Wolf under Hamsterlings. For 100 turns, he tried to kill me with Roaches that had six bounce effects. Three times he burned my cards, returning creatures to my hand with nine cards, and twice he returned my Bahamut, which I played for 6 mana after it was returned twice as a Wyvern... I never drew a Storm unit that could have won the game 10 turns earlier, so I had to finish him off with a 13-damage attack. Without Meeples, Water Elementals, and Goblins, it's still easier; it's harder to stack damage on a Roach.
Lesoklov, who after death triggers a "homecoming," is what I mean. This "homecoming" removes all wards from the opponent and leaves them completely defenseless against the cockroach combo.
The only problem is that decent cockroaches end the game around rounds 7-8, and Mischief can be much more useful than Homecoming because it allows you to remove the enemy's ward while simultaneously spinning the combo.
Ment
