Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Go english, everybody here knows english, and that's the thing that I can't say about other suggestions. I really don't understand the problem. NS is English, so it's only logical that Actaea is totally English-speaking. And I don't like French. Japanese would be nice though, lol.
А, вот почему.
??+⛓️♿=?
Ment
Auto-translated
Go english, everybody here knows english, and that's the thing that I can't say about other suggestions. I really don't understand the problem. NS is English, so it's only logical that Actaea is totally English-speaking. And I don't like French. Japanese would be nice though, lol.
This message from Koshi is truly imbued with the spirit of NS. It was somewhat similar to accepting some issue before, but now it's even more so.
Ah, I see... But there are still some problems here: 1) Once again, the Steelmen are legally correct. 2) If the Security Council functions normally, they can indeed be "asked" rather than "forced." Only then will the "request" have legal force. There are two consequences: first, a sense of legality and the need to follow the law. If they don't comply, there is almost a 100% guarantee that coercive measures can now be used, because no country, seeing such a violation of the law, will stand up for the aggressor. And it won't remain silent.
1) So, is it legally acceptable to poison people with chemical weapons? You guys in Mushroom Kingdom have had too much freedom :D 2) And I'm not arguing, any issue is best resolved peacefully. Join the council, comply with resolutions, and so on. Understand, I'm considering extreme cases (that's why I'm paying close attention to your points in the regulations regarding military aggression), because anything can happen in a state
В тихой однообразной жизни всегда так бывает: каждый отдельный день бесконечно долог, но месяцы и годы мчатся с непостижимой быстротой.
I wanted to offer you some flowers, but a crown would suit a princess like you much better
Смысл жизни в том, что жизнь на тебе не заканчивается
Небо
everybody here knows english
Я не знаю.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт Небо – угроз не слышит Небо – ведёт особый счёт Небо – тебя найдёт
Undoubtedly, there are inconsistencies in the description. But why argue when many countries in history have elements of exaggeration and even fantasy.
I know I'm replying with a significant delay, but I really wanted to write this post all week, but I was too busy at work. Yes, indeed, everyone has inconsistencies in their description, you can find mistakes everywhere, this can be said about me, as well as about everyone else, except for Arandor, of course. But one thing is some inconsistencies and assumptions, and quite another is complete disregard, I'm not even talking about logic, but even just common sense. Even a six-year-old would consider the description of the state of Menta to be a fairy tale, and not a description of a real, semi-real, or even fictional state. Here I am thinking about the inconsistencies in my story, which I have yet to post. I don't focus on them and don't pretend that it was intended that way; I try to make them look like conventions, but ones that could still have happened. And what does our Menta do? He shoves all his inconsistencies in your face. If we go into analogies and comparisons, it's like when you're doing your business in the toilet, you can spill a couple of drops on your shoes, or you can piss your pants. In both cases, there is carelessness, but if the first one can still seem acceptable, then the second is a real fiasco. And Menta's "inconsistencies" are exactly that level. And when you point them out to him, the only reaction is: "hehehe))) Believe it or not)))) Blue face belched, chubby face farted)) Hehe". Seriously, I'm surprised why Menta doesn't use toilet humor, because it seems that the level of his texts is still identical to jokes of that kind. But Menta's "role-playing" is a whole other story. I'm not kidding when I say that I like Arza's role-playing. Yes, perhaps Arza himself doesn't realize how great he is at role-playing, yes, as a result, constant parallels are drawn with Russia, with which he disagrees, but in the end, a vivid image is created of both the country itself and its ruler. Moreover, this image is extremely plausible, and it is easy to draw parallels with real life. And what do we see with Menta? I already said about the giggling of faces of various shades, but that's only half the battle. You see, Menta doesn't understand why his state, created for jokes and giggling, is not taken seriously. Really! Who would have thought that would happen! You, my dear reader, could have predicted such a turn?! Well, Menta couldn't! Really, why doesn't he want to be invited to councils? Well, okay, he came himself))))))))00000000000000. Oh no, he didn't come, Revan forbade it, uuuuu, grumpy((((. Never mind, I'll create my own council, with mushrooms and champignons! Oh, Siever writes that stupid, drug-addicted savages are easily enslaved((( Can this be tolerated? I'll write that I have savages with machine guns who don't understand that it's impossible to fight naked in any weather and geographical conditions, but at the same time they vigilantly guard their borders, because everything is serious here! It is not permissible for my inhabitants to be treated with contempt! I only partially read the dialogue on the topic of coalitions, security alliances, and military blocs, but I saw that Menta writes more posts than everyone else combined; apparently, he really doesn't understand why there is such aggression against his bloc. Maybe it's because a state created for gimmicks creates an organization filled with sparkling humor and at the same time wants it all to be taken seriously? Did that thought ever occur to him? No? Kosha also had a state based on a joke - "well, like, a cute flag and a cruel dictatorship, breaking the mold))))00". But Kosha, unlike some, felt some trends in the game, namely the fact that most countries are, at a minimum, based on a quasi-plausible description of both the country itself and its politics, as a result of which, in addition to the flag and mentions of pink, there are not many contradictions in her country, especially if you take the version with Amelia being replaced by a younger girl as the main one. Kosha could also continue to promote the originally chosen line, for example, sending blondes in pink to contests))))) And puppies))))) Well, you get the idea))))) But for some reason, the person realized that this would be a joke unacceptable for most. Okay, okay, let's stop talking for everyone - that would be unacceptable, at least for Arandor, me, and Revan. But Menta doesn't understand this, and wants to be both a jester and conduct serious business politics at the same time. Why? I don't know, but I know that it disgusts me and I don't understand it. SORRY, I GOT FED UP, I DECIDED TO SPEAK OUT. And someone calls me a troll. Look at Menta - for the second time, it just makes me sick.
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?
Ment
Auto-translated
1) So, is it legally acceptable to use chemical weapons against people? Did you guys in Mushroom Kingdom get too much freedom?
As funny as it sounds, in this case – yes. In our world, such things are prohibited because there is the UN, whose jurisdiction extends to all countries. And also international treaties. In the case of the Steelmen, none of this will exist.
2) And I'm not arguing, any issue is best resolved peacefully. Join the council, comply with resolutions, and so on. You see, I'm considering extreme cases (that's why I'm paying close attention to your points in the regulations regarding military aggression).
That's also true, but I'm considering all cases, not just extreme ones. The general case is somehow more interesting and closer to reality, and it also provides clearer examples for my purposes.