Heroes VII — General

Ple-Sen

12 years ago

Auto-translated

As they say, even among warriors, there are also clerics – chaplains!

Added 1 minute ago
The names of some units and machines, by the way, are not very imaginative. Combat machines? Great pyramid and small pyramid! The strongest creature? Magic bird and its more powerful form, the MAGICAL bird.

Ment

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Don't they fight with weapons in hand? I doubt it. Besides, I don't remember any unit called "chaplain" in the "Heroes" series. P.S. The fact that the combat units of different factions differ not only in appearance but also in concept (priestesses in Haven have very little in common with the first aid tent in Academy) gives hope that they will have their own unique features and advantages.

A magical bird and its more powerful form, the ENCHANTED bird.

I hope they rename it...

Ple-Sen

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Yeah, most likely they'll be ranged units. And there weren't warriors like that before. But they added them. I don't think they'll be much different from monks/fanatics/inquisitors from previous installments.

In reply to Ment

psatkha

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Ment

The poll was amusing. Why can't they add both factions? Are they stingy or something? )
Anyway, it's clear that the elves will win. Let the dirty debates with insults and name-calling begin!

Well, yes, with such percentages, there's no doubt, but maybe there will be a DLC?!

P.S. I voted for the dwarves with their berserkers and saw that the dwarves are losing to the high elves 33 to 67 :(

Ple-Sen

12 years ago

Auto-translated

No, the poll was conducted because there isn't enough funding to include all the factions.

Added after 58 seconds
However, the expansion pack might include a new faction. If the game is commercially successful. Purely theoretically.

In reply to Ple-Sen

Sanctuary

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Ple-Sen

If the game proves to be commercially successful. Purely theoretically.

The 7th installment should be very good, if not perfect.

Ple-Sen

12 years ago

Auto-translated

It's definitely not perfect. The style is a bit better than in the sixth installment, but it's still awful. The world is dull, depressing, and doesn't stand out from the crowd. Moreover, they plan to make the game in 3D, which is also a highly questionable decision.

Heroist

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Indeed, it could have been made entirely in 2D, saving money and allowing for two more factions to be included.

In reply to Ple-Sen

Sanctuary

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Ple-Sen

Besides, they are planning to make the game in 3D, which is also a highly debatable decision.

A 2D game in 2014. That's funny:smile54: How many fans of Heroes 3 are there? A couple of hundred thousand? And Heroes 5? Seven hundred thousand? The first was in 2D, the second in 3D. So it's not a debatable decision at all.

Added 1 minute ago
It seems that the Russian community wants to deliberately bury the game.

Ple-Sen

12 years ago

Auto-translated

As far as I know, it would be more expensive. Good 2D is more expensive than 3D. Especially considering that models from the sixth game were used in Might & Magic X.

Added 3 minutes later

A 2D game in 2014. That's funny.

2D games are still being made, and even isometric ones. It's not hard to find 2D games on Steam.

How many fans of Heroes of Might and Magic III are there? A couple of hundred thousand? And Heroes of Might and Magic V? Seven hundred thousand?

1) You pulled those numbers out of thin air. 2) Even fans may not like a particular element of the game. I know many people who like the fifth game but would like it to be 2D.

In reply to Ple-Sen

Sanctuary

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Ple-Sen

1) You just pulled those numbers out of thin air.
2) Even fans might not like a particular element of the game. I know a lot of people who like the fifth game, but would prefer it to be 2D.

1. Yes, I just made them up. I admit it...
2. I haven't met anyone like that:confused:

Added 1 minute ago

Ple-Sen

It would be more expensive, as far as I know. Good 2D is more expensive than 3D. Especially considering that Might & Magic X used models from the sixth game.

and remembering that Might & Magic X was in 3D.

Ple-Sen

12 years ago

Auto-translated

and remember that MM10 was in 3D

I was talking about the fact that 3D is cheaper. That's why I used MMH as an example, using models from old games. Your post doesn't make sense.

Heroist

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Good 2D is better than 3D.

Hmm, that's interesting, I didn't know that. What is the world coming to...

How many fans of Heroes 3 are there? A couple of hundred thousand? And Heroes 5? Seven hundred thousand? The first one is in 2D, the second one is in 3D. So it's definitely not debatable.

I disagree. There might be more fans of the third game. And it's better to remove the word "thousand."

Ment

12 years ago

Auto-translated

Besides, they plan to make the game in 3D, which is also a highly debatable decision.

Well, making an indie 2D game based on Heroes is also not exactly a brilliant idea... Unless they find great artists, like in the third installment. And even then, it's hard to believe that people will accept it, after the fifth Heroes game, they expect something different from the series.

It would be more expensive, as far as I know. Good 2D is more expensive than 3D.

Even more so.

Ple-Sen

12 years ago

Auto-translated

I doubt people will like it, especially after the fifth installment in the series; they're expecting something different.

As far as I can tell, most players who are looking forward to the new game are hoping for a return to the roots of the series. I wouldn't say that the fanbase has grown significantly, but I could be wrong.

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from Heroes VII

Statistics

Library

Users Online 3 users 1353 guests

Today's Visitors 13