Ambassador

My impressions of the game: perhaps the author will find it interesting.
Overall, I liked the map; it's well done! Excellent concept, and generally, everything is top-notch.
I started playing with a hero.
The spells for the main hero mainly protect the archers (druids, monks), I don't know if it's intentional or not, who move faster than me, and consequently, eliminate a significant portion of the army. Losing an army with such meager reinforcements was not part of my plans, so I naturally avoided many outposts. I reached the garrison where I'm not allowed to proceed further into the Dungeon. I came here to read. I read. After that, my interest in the map disappeared:
1) To complete the map, you need to develop the hero in a specific way (like with the Dungeon faction), but there are no hints within the map itself, except for insider information. (some information on signs, clues, etc.) If that's the case, there should still be the possibility of completing the map with variable hero builds. I've played difficult maps with the Dungeon faction - well, yes, everything is clear there, and it's winnable. But that's already been done.
2) The second remark is for the map in general. (it's noticeable even in the first month and a half, and if you read about the players' experiences, it should only get worse). To successfully complete the map, you have to replay many, even minor, battles. That is, you have to attack superior forces, and to win successfully, you have to rely on a lucky outcome, rather than your own intelligence. I don't like this style of replaying 5 times, and it also indicates that the balance is not right.
3) A general lack of information. All information MUST be WITHIN the map without any references to external sources. For example: yes, most things can be completed without problems with Lorenzo, but WHERE is it written that there should be 200 archers? How am I supposed to find that out within the map?