Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I can also run the game in the usual format, but it's much less interesting than the proposed one. Am I the only one who notices that, at least recently, the entire game, no matter how interesting the setting, boils down to one template:
1) Someone writes a simple analysis of the newspaper after it's been read.
2a) Everyone else either repeats what has already been said, or remains silent because it's already clear, or writes something like "let's just chat to reach a thousand posts!"
2b) They simply vote to ban someone.
And if the game does pick up towards the end, it might lead to some intrigue.
As soon as Arandor introduced some ambiguity into the descriptions of the murders, there was suddenly more interest in the game; it became necessary to calculate all the possibilities and guess to arrive at the correct conclusion. But it seems I was the only one who noticed this, because everyone else was either calculating it in their private chats or simply following my lead in voting. The execution of Ment is a particularly telling example.