Mafia 109. Dreams of the Void Warriors

Evidence pointing to Arandor emerged, and now the topic has become "complicated," and "there is a great risk of wrongly condemning an innocent person." Convenient. Wasn't the risk just as great with the previous evidence? Do you think that the previous evidence was more solid than the new evidence? Some of the new evidence appeals to me much more than the initial evidence.

It's much simpler. I warned before the start that I would have difficulties with the game due to work. While I had time, I tried to guess the clues and understand what was happening. Today, I can only read superficially. Tox's behavior caught my attention yesterday, and I expressed my opinion about him, which should have been heeded. I don't trust Tox at all, so Arandor is just suspicious to me, even if the clue seems to fit. I haven't checked it.