Posts from [POLL] Who is to blame, and what should be done?

Seeing you here gives the impression that the CIS championship is some kind of Masonic lodge.

Come and join, admission is free!

Exactly, and if you don't show up and join, you don't have a right to vote. It's funny.

Exactly, because it turns into a situation like this:
I'm building a house, and you've never been to a construction site, but you're saying the house is terrible and poorly made. But how can you assess the quality or a particular situation when you only hear about it from people who haven't been there, haven't seen it, and haven't heard about it, yet they all feel obligated to express their opinion and completely criticize it.
"Don't wade into the water if you don't know the ford." (Russian proverb).

Exactly, because it turns into a situation like this:
I'm building a house, and you've never been to a construction site, but you're saying the house is bad and poorly made. But how can you assess the quality or a particular situation when you only hear about it from people who haven't been there, haven't seen it, and haven't heard about it, and yet they all feel obligated to express their opinion and completely condemn it.
"Don't wade into the water if you don't know the ford." (Russian proverb).

What kind of argument is that, comparing a house to water with a ford? You yourself wrote that you lost, shook hands (respectfully acknowledged the defeat), and then offered money for the win (respectful and honest, according to you?).

Just understand one simple thing: you can't divide everything into black and white; the situation is quite ambiguous because there are many factors for and against.
The result of the situation is that all participants in the event agreed that it would be this way and not another, because read what the participants of the tournament write – no one is posting things like: deprive one of the championship, put the second in a circle of condemnation, etc.
Everyone who participated was satisfied, and regarding the condemnation and trolling about the 21st Arch in the mine, they got enough of it.

Well, and yes, in my opinion, the main mistake was made in the last round - after Aive's victory, he should have been explained the political necessity of selling the game to Hell. Expecting him to figure it out on his own is hardly reasonable, but the judges and organizers could have certainly figured it out, they've been doing this for years.

All that remains is to explain to Hell the political necessity of buying the game from Ive. Honestly, I didn't expect to see such nonsense from you.

Well, and yes, in my opinion, the main mistake was made in the last round - after Aive's victory, it was necessary to explain to him the political necessity of selling the game to Hell. Expecting him to figure it out on his own is hardly reasonable, but the judges and organizers could certainly have thought about it; they've been doing this for years.