Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Exactly, because it turns into a situation like this: I'm building a house, and you've never been to a construction site, but you're saying the house is bad and poorly made. But how can you assess the quality or a particular situation when you only hear about it from people who haven't been there, haven't seen it, and haven't heard about it, and yet they all feel obligated to express their opinion and completely condemn it. "Don't wade into the water if you don't know the ford." (Russian proverb).
But can't fixed matches and violations of fair play be assessed differently? You yourselves, by trying to justify the players, are only making things worse for yourselves and them. It's turning into a vicious cycle. The attitude towards rules and sportsmanship is evident. And then you wonder why many don't consider your championship a serious event.